Technology Assessment as Learning

This article addresses the question of how policymakers could deliberately influence processes of technology development. Using the development of wind turbines in Denmark as an example, the article describes the frames of meaning guiding the actions of those involved in the three subprocesses of policymaking, the generation of new technologies, and the management of the firms that bring new artifacts to the market. The three types of actors share an interest in one notion: the meaning of a technological artifact. This notion, however, plays a different role in the respective frames of meaning of the actors. For policymakers and managers, it is an instrumental notion. For technologists, it provides guidance to their activities. The shared interest affords the possibility of reaching common action with only congruent (not necessarily shared) meanings. Interactive forms of technology assessment can play a central role in bringing about such congruent meanings and thus in influencing the generation of new technologies.

[1]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[2]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions , 1979 .

[3]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[5]  Herman R. van Gunsteren,et al.  The quest for control: A critique of the rational-central-rule approach in public affairs , 1976 .

[6]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[8]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[9]  B. Lloyd.  Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology and social choice , 1991 .

[10]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[11]  Tom Carney.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1991 .

[12]  I. Lakatos.  History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions , 1970, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[13]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Politics, Values, and Public Policy: The Problem of Methodology. , 1981 .

[14]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[15]  M. Schwarz,et al.  Divided We Stand: Re-Defining Politics, Technology, and Social Choice , 1990 .

[16]  Eugene Bardach,et al.  The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes Law. , 1977 .

[17]  R. Hoppe,et al.  Beleid en Politiek. Een Inleiding tot de Beleidswetenschap en de Beleidskunde , 1996 .

[18]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[19]  Eugene Bardach,et al.  The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. , 1977 .

[20]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Managing the Public's Business: The Job of the Government Executive , 1982 .

[21]  Gordon P. Whitaker.  Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery , 1980 .

[22]  W. Bijker.  The social construction of bakelite: toward a theory of invention , 1987 .

[23]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  Managing Public Policy , 1987 .

[24]  P. Kline.  Models of man , 1986, Nature.

[25]  Joske F. G. Bunders.  Participative Strategies for Science-Based Innovations: The Case of Biotechnology for Small-Scale Farmers in Developing Countries , 1995 .

[26]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Utilization-Focused Evaluation , 1979 .

[27]  C. Weiss,et al.  Social science research and decision-making , 1980 .

[28]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[29]  Joh. de Vries.  M.L. Bemelmans-Videc, Economen in overheidsdienst. Bijdragen van Nederlandse economen aan de vorming van het sociaal-economisch beleid, 1945-1975 , 1987 .

[30]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Evaluating Public Policy , 1995 .

[31]  P. Sabatier.  Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change , 1987 .

[32]  Henk van de Graaf,et al.  Implementation research and policy design: problem tractability, policy theory, and feasibility testing , 1987 .

[33]  Donald A. Schön.  The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[34]  Carol H. Weiss,et al.  Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion , 1980 .

[35]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[36]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[37]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[38]  Keith Newton,et al.  Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions — Theory, Cases and Techniques , 1982 .

[39]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[40]  Charles E. Lindblom,et al.  The intelligence of democracy : decision making through mutual adjustment , 1965 .