Collective response to perturbations in a data-driven fish school model

Fish schools are able to display a rich variety of collective states and behavioural responses when they are confronted by threats. However, a school's response to perturbations may be different depending on the nature of its collective state. Here we use a previously developed data-driven fish school model to investigate how the school responds to perturbations depending on its different collective states, we measure its susceptibility to such perturbations, and exploit its relation with the intrinsic fluctuations in the school. In particular, we study how a single or a small number of perturbing individuals whose attraction and alignment parameters are different from those of the main population affect the long-term behaviour of a school. We find that the responsiveness of the school to the perturbations is maximum near the transition region between milling and schooling states where the school exhibits multistability and regularly shifts between these two states. It is also in this region that the susceptibility, and hence the fluctuations, of the polarization order parameter is maximal. We also find that a significant school's response to a perturbation only happens below a certain threshold of the noise to social interactions ratio.

[1]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  Insect Swarms Go Critical , 2014 .

[2]  A. Cavagna,et al.  Finite-size scaling as a way to probe near-criticality in natural swarms. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[3]  Daniel S. Calovi,et al.  Swarming, schooling, milling: phase diagram of a data-driven fish school model , 2013, 1308.2889.

[4]  Andrea Cavagna,et al.  Collective Behaviour without Collective Order in Wild Swarms of Midges , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  W. Bialek,et al.  Social interactions dominate speed control in poising natural flocks near criticality , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Local disalignment can promote coherent collective motion , 2013 .

[7]  Jeff Moehlis,et al.  How the Spatial Position of Individuals Affects Their Influence on Swarms: A Numerical Comparison of Two Popular Swarm Dynamics Models , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Collective States, Multistability and Transitional Behavior in Schooling Fish , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  I. Couzin,et al.  Predatory Fish Select for Coordinated Collective Motion in Virtual Prey , 2012, Science.

[10]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Deciphering Interactions in Moving Animal Groups , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Portraits of self-organization in fish schools interacting with robots , 2012 .

[12]  Minoru Asada,et al.  Information processing in echo state networks at the edge of chaos , 2011, Theory in Biosciences.

[13]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  I. Giardina Collective Animal Behavior David J.T. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  W. Bialek,et al.  Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality? , 2010, 1012.2242.

[17]  Matteo Aureli,et al.  Coordination of self-propelled particles through external leadership , 2010 .

[18]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Emergence of Oblong School Shape: Models and Empirical Data of Fish , 2010 .

[19]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. M. Cullen,et al.  Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators , 2009 .

[21]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Analyzing fish movement as a persistent turning walker , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[22]  A. Vulpiani,et al.  Fluctuation-dissipation: Response theory in statistical physics , 2008, 0803.0719.

[23]  C. Hemelrijk,et al.  Self-Organized Shape and Frontal Density of Fish Schools , 2008 .

[24]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  The effect of population size and number of influential neighbors on the emergent properties of fish schools , 2005 .

[25]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[26]  E. Standen,et al.  Escape manoeuvres in the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  B. Partridge Internal dynamics and the interrelations of fish in schools , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[28]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  Living in Groups.Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution.ByJens Krauseand, Graeme D Ruxton.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. $95.00 (hardcover); $45.00 (paper). xiv + 210 p; ill.; author and general indexes. ISBN: 0–19–850817–4 (hc); 0–19–850818–2 (pb). 2002. , 2003 .

[29]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[30]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  Self-Organized Fish Schools: An Examination of Emergent Properties , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[32]  G. Huse,et al.  Modelling changes in migration pattern of herring: collective behaviour and numerical domination , 2002 .

[33]  Neha Bhooshan,et al.  The Simulation of the Movement of Fish Schools , 2001 .

[34]  Paolo Domenici,et al.  Escape behaviour of solitary herring (Clupea harengus ) and comparisons with schooling individuals , 1997 .

[35]  W. L. Romey Individual differences make a difference in the trajectories of simulated schools of fish , 1996 .

[36]  Y. Yi,et al.  [Studies on the structure of isoastilbin]. , 1996, Yao xue xue bao = Acta pharmaceutica Sinica.

[37]  A. Magurran,et al.  The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator defense in fish , 1990 .

[38]  B L Partridge,et al.  The structure and function of fish schools. , 1982, Scientific American.

[39]  I. Aoki A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. , 1982 .

[40]  W. Foster,et al.  Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect , 1981, Nature.

[41]  W. Foster,et al.  Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: The trafalgar effect , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  W. Foster,et al.  The effects of group size on predator avoidance in a marine insect , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  D. V. Radakov Schooling in the ecology of fish , 1973 .

[44]  G. Uhlenbeck,et al.  On the Theory of the Brownian Motion , 1930 .