Feature and classifier fusion for 12-lead ECG classification

Two methodologies, feature and classifier fusion, for the problem of computerized 12-lead electrocardiogram classification, are investigated. Firstly, the entire classification problem is subdivided into a number of smaller bi-dimensional ones. By employing bi-group Neural Network classifiers, independent feature vectors for each diagnostic class are examined individually and the output from each classifier are fused together to produce one single result. Secondly, two classifiers, namely the aforementioned and a decision tree, are fused together through a novel approach of a Specificity Matrix. This methodology addresses the problem of unresolved conflict during fusion of classifiers and aims to exploit the merits of each classifier and suppress their weaknesses. 290 validated 12-lead electrocardiogram recordings, comprising six diagnostic classes, were used to train, validate and test both methodologies. The framework of bi-group classifiers enhanced the overall performance by 12.0% in comparison with conventional approaches. In the second instance, the fusion of the two classifiers produced a performance level of 81.3%; superior to either classifier in isolation. This approach offers a viable solution to the unresolved problem of conflict between classifiers during fusion and can be extended readily to accommodate any number of diagnostic classes and classifiers.

[1]  Adam Krzyżak,et al.  Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  Y. Lu Evidential reasoning in a multiple classifier system , 1993 .

[3]  R. Degani,et al.  Comparison of diagnostic results of ECG computer programs and cardiologists , 1991, [1991] Proceedings Computers in Cardiology.

[4]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Decision Combination in Multiple Classifier Systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  C Brohet,et al.  Effect of combining electrocardiographic interpretation results on diagnostic accuracy. , 1988, European heart journal.

[6]  C Zywietz,et al.  Common Standards for Quantitative Electrocardiography: Goals and Main Results , 1990, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[7]  A Weizman,et al.  Backpropagation and adaptive resonance theory in predicting suicidal risk. , 1998, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[8]  C Brohet,et al.  Possibilities of using neural networks for ECG classification. , 1996, Journal of electrocardiology.

[9]  J A Kors,et al.  Classification Methods for Computerized Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram , 1990, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[10]  David G. Bounds,et al.  A comparison of neural network and other pattern recognition approaches to the diagnosis of low back disorders , 1990, Neural Networks.

[11]  H V PIPBERGER,et al.  Automatic Recognition of Electrocardiographic Waves by Digital Computer , 1961, Circulation research.

[12]  J Cornfield,et al.  Multigroup diagnosis of electrocardiograms. , 1973, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[13]  J. L. Willems,et al.  Diagnostic ECG classification based on neural networks. , 1993, Journal of electrocardiology.

[14]  P W Macfarlane Recent developments in computer analysis of ECGs. , 1992, Clinical physiology.

[15]  J. Cornfield,et al.  Clinical application of a second generation electrocardiographic computer program. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  C Zywietz,et al.  Signal Analysis for ECG Interpretation , 1990, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[18]  Georg Dorffner,et al.  On using feedforward neural networks for clinical diagnostic tasks , 1994, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[19]  N Maglaveras,et al.  Decision support for insulin regime prescription based on a neural-network approach. , 2011, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[20]  J L Willems,et al.  Quantitative electrocardiography. Standardization and performance evaluation. , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.