A comparison of the different interpair intervals in the conditioning-testing P50 paradigms.

The conditioning-testing P50 paradigm is used to demonstrate sensory gating of responsiveness to auditory stimuli. Sensory gating is measured in terms of a suppression of the second (test) P50 component in that paradigm. The time course of sensory gating can be determined by examining subjects' gating of responsiveness to stimuli repeated at various interpair intervals. In the present study auditory evoked potentials were recorded using a paired click, conditioning-testing P50 paradigm in 11 normal subjects with no family history of any psychotic disorder. Recordings were made at conditioning-testing intervals of 250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms and 1000 ms. Whereas the grand averages of the P50 conditioning-testing response for the 250- and 500-ms intervals were 3.07% and 37.2%, respectively, indicating almost complete suppression, the grand averages of the ratios for the 750- and 1000-ms intervals were 114.35% and 92.92%, respectively, indicating little or no suppression. There was significant correlation in the C-T ratios with the increasing intervals. Our results suggest that the mechanism(s) responsible for sensory gating is activated mostly during the 500 ms after stimulus presentation. Other gating mechanism(s) functioning at longer intervals appear to be uncertain.

[1]  H. Fruhstorfer,et al.  Short-term habituation of the auditory evoked response in man. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Wiser,et al.  Normalization of auditory physiology by cigarette smoking in schizophrenic patients. , 1993, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  R Freedman,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in neuronal mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia. , 1982, Biological psychiatry.

[4]  A. Papanicolaou,et al.  Evoked potential attenuation in the two-tone paradigm. , 1985, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[5]  J. Simpson,et al.  SPASTICITY: MECHANISM, MEASUREMENT, MANAGEMENT , 1970 .

[6]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[7]  J. Gruzelier,et al.  Laterality, Attention and Rate Effects in the Auditory Temporal Discrimination of Chronic Schizophrenics: The Effect of Treatment with Chlorpromazine , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  A. Papanicolaou,et al.  Age-related differences in recovery cycle of auditory evoked potentials , 1984, Neurobiology of Aging.

[9]  J S Buchwald,et al.  Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential recovery cycle characteristics. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  D L Braff,et al.  Sensory gating deficits in schizophrenia: new results. , 1992, The American journal of psychiatry.

[11]  R. CONRAD Decay Theory of Immediate Memory , 1957, Nature.

[12]  R Freedman,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in inhibitory pathways in schizophrenia: comparison of medicated and drug-free patients. , 1983, Biological psychiatry.

[13]  H. Davis,et al.  The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery process. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  Robert Freedman,et al.  Sensory gating in schizophrenics and normal controls: Effects of changing stimulation interval , 1989, Biological Psychiatry.

[15]  Robert Freedman,et al.  Gating of auditory response in schizophrenics and normal controls Effects of recording site and stimulation interval on the P50 wave , 1991, Schizophrenia Research.

[16]  W. Roth,et al.  The auditory evoked response to repeated stimuli during a vigilance task. , 1969, Psychophysiology.