Comparative Assessment of Online Written Health Information on Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction in English and Hindi Language Webpages

To assess and compare the overall quality of online written information on the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in English and Hindi language webpages. Also, correlates of the quality of online health information were explored. First 50 links obtained on Google search in both English and Hindi language were screened, and a total of 86 (45 English, 41 Hindi) webpages providing patient-oriented information on the treatment of ED were analysed. Content quality and reliability were assessed using the DISCERN scale and the JAMA benchmark criteria respectively. Additionally, aesthetics, interactivity, and readability were evaluated. The DISCERN score indicative of content quality was significantly higher for English webpages compared to Hindi webpages. English webpages were more likely to meet disclosure and attribution JAMA criteria for the reliability of medical information. English webpages with HONcode certification were more likely to have better content quality than those without it. However, none of the Hindi web pages analyzed were HONcode certified. English language webpages provided better overall quality of information on treatment of ED as compared to Hindi language. HONcode label might be used as a proxy indicator of better content quality for online resources informing on ED treatment by laypersons. There is a need to develop and popularize the usage of HONcode or other similar online health information quality accreditation systems for webpages in non-English languages like Hindi.

[1]  R. Sagar,et al.  Quality of web-based information on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. , 2022, Asian journal of psychiatry.

[2]  M. Mullick,et al.  The Pattern of Help-Seeking Behavior Among Patients With Sexual Dysfunctions Attending in Psychiatry Outpatient Department in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh , 2021, Sexual medicine.

[3]  I. Thangasamy,et al.  Quality and readability of online patient information on treatment for erectile dysfunction , 2021, BJUI compass.

[4]  Anqi Huang,et al.  Online health information-seeking behaviors and skills of Chinese college students , 2021, BMC Public Health.

[5]  Gopi Battineni,et al.  Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information , 2020, Digital health.

[6]  B. Challacombe,et al.  The global prevalence of erectile dysfunction: a review , 2019, BJU international.

[7]  Ciaran B. Trace,et al.  Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  B. Hanley,et al.  Assessment of the quality and readability of online information on autopsy for the general public: a cross-sectional analysis , 2019, BMJ Open.

[9]  E. Chung,et al.  Erectile dysfunction treatment and traditional medicine—can East and West medicine coexist? , 2017, Translational andrology and urology.

[10]  E. Wallen,et al.  Readability of American online patient education materials in urologic oncology: a need for simple communication. , 2015, Urology.

[11]  John M. Grohol,et al.  The Quality of Mental Health Information Commonly Searched for on the Internet , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  Yasser Khazaal,et al.  HON Label and DISCERN as Content Quality Indicators of Health-Related Websites , 2012, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[13]  E. Laumann,et al.  A population-based survey of sexual activity, sexual problems and associated help-seeking behavior patterns in mature adults in the United States of America , 2009, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[14]  H. Christensen,et al.  Website Quality Indicators for Consumers , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  R. Harkaway,et al.  Under-reporting of erectile dysfunction among men with unrelated urologic conditions , 2003, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[16]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  V P Abbott,et al.  Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings. , 2000, Journal of public health medicine.

[18]  G D Lundberg,et al.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. , 1997, JAMA.