Path Analysis for the Halo Effect of Touch Sensations of Robots on Their Personality Impressions

Physical human–robot interaction plays an important role in social robotics, and touch is one of the key factors that influences human’s impression of robots. However, very few studies have explored different conditions, and therefore, few systematic results have been obtained. As the first step toward addressing this issue, we studied the types of impressions of robot personality that humans may experience when they touch a soft part of a robot. In the study, the left forearm of a child-like android robot “Affetto” was exposed; this forearm was made of silicone rubber and can be replaced with one of other three forearms providing different sensations of hardness upon touching. Participants were asked to touch the robot’s forearm and to fill evaluation questionnaires on 19 touch sensations and 46 personality impressions under each of four conditions with different forearms. Four impression factors for touch sensations and three for personality impressions were extracted from the evaluation scores by the factor analysis method. The causal relationships between these factors were analyzed by the path analysis method. Several significant causal relationships were found, for example, between preferable touch sensations and likable personality impressions. The results will help design robots’ personality impression by designing touch sensations more systematically.

[1]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Semi-Autonomous Robot Avatar as a Medium for Family Communication and Education , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[2]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  The Role of Affective Touch in Human-Robot Interaction: Human Intent and Expectations in Touching the Haptic Creature , 2012, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Gaze behaviour, believability, likability and the iCat , 2009, AI & SOCIETY.

[4]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Effects of form and motion on judgments of social robots' animacy, likability, trustworthiness and unpleasantness , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Importance of Touch for Conveying Affection in a Multimodal Interaction with a Small Humanoid Robot , 2015, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[6]  T. Shibata,et al.  Robot Therapy: A New Approach for Mental Healthcare of the Elderly – A Mini-Review , 2010, Gerontology.

[7]  森 善一,et al.  Evaluation of Impression for Hug Dolls , 2012 .

[8]  C. Osgood.  The nature and measurement of meaning. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Masaaki Inoue,et al.  THE RESEARCH DOMAIN AND SCALE CONSTRUCTION OF ADJECTIVE-PAIRS IN A SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL METHOD IN JAPAN , 1985 .

[10]  Takashi Minato,et al.  Evoking Affection for a Communication Partner by a Robotic Communication Medium , 2013 .

[11]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  Keepon : A Playful Robot for Research, Therapy, and Entertainment (Original Paper) , 2009 .

[12]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms , 2003, Speech Commun..

[13]  Minoru Asada,et al.  Design of 22-DOF pneumatically actuated upper body for child android ‘Affetto’ , 2015, Adv. Robotics.

[14]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. , 1977 .

[15]  Aude Billard,et al.  A survey of Tactile Human-Robot Interactions , 2010, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[16]  加納 政芳,et al.  なにもできないロボット Babyloid の開発 , 2011 .

[17]  T. Kanda,et al.  Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human-robot Interaction , 2006 .

[18]  K. MacDorman,et al.  Subjective Ratings of Robot Video Clips for Human Likeness, Familiarity, and Eeriness: An Exploration of the Uncanny Valley , 2006 .

[19]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Is The Uncanny Valley An Uncanny Cliff? , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[20]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  ‘Give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy on people's responses to embodied social agents , 2009 .

[21]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  The effects of robot touch and proactive behaviour on perceptions of human-robot interactions , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[22]  Takashi Maeno,et al.  Development of Artificial Skin Having Human Skin-like Texture (Realization and Evaluation of Human Skin-like Texture by Emulating Surface Shape Pattern and Elastic Structure) , 2007 .

[23]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[24]  Minoru Asada,et al.  CB2: A child robot with biomimetic body for cognitive developmental robotics , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.