Language Processing Differences Between Blind and Sighted Individuals and the Abstract Versus Concrete Concept Difference

In the property listing task (PLT), participants are asked to list properties for a concept (e.g., for the concept dog, "barks," and "is a pet" may be produced). In conceptual property norming (CPNs) studies, participants are asked to list properties for large sets of concepts. Here, we use a mathematical model of the property listing process to explore two longstanding issues: characterizing the difference between concrete and abstract concepts, and characterizing semantic knowledge in the blind versus sighted population. When we apply our mathematical model to a large CPN reporting properties listed by sighted and blind participants, the model uncovers significant differences between concrete and abstract concepts. Though we also find that blind individuals show many of the same processing differences between abstract and concrete concepts found in sighted individuals, our model shows that those differences are noticeably less pronounced than in sighted individuals. We discuss our results vis-a-vis theories attempting to characterize abstract concepts.

[1]  Enrique Canessa,et al.  Mathematical regularities of data from the property listing task , 2020, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[2]  Marco Tullio Liuzza,et al.  Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions , 2019, Language and Cognition.

[3]  Giulia V. Elli,et al.  Knowledge of animal appearance among sighted and blind adults , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. , 2019, Physics of life reviews.

[5]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Learning and Processing Abstract Words and Concepts: Insights From Typical and Atypical Development , 2018, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[6]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Enrique Canessa,et al.  The role of variability in the property listing task , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[8]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Abstract semantics in the motor system? – An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning , 2017, Cortex.

[9]  J. Vivas,et al.  Spanish semantic feature production norms for 400 concrete concepts , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[10]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The challenge of abstract concepts. , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Alexis Amadon,et al.  Word meaning in the ventral visual path: a perceptual to conceptual gradient of semantic coding , 2016, NeuroImage.

[12]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Semantic Richness Effects in Syntactic Classification: The Role of Feedback , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[13]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition , 2015 .

[14]  Charu C. Aggarwal,et al.  Data Mining , 2015, Springer International Publishing.

[15]  Jeroen Geertzen,et al.  The Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain (CSLB) concept property norms , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[16]  T. Rogers,et al.  Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[17]  Ettore Ambrosini,et al.  Semantic memory: A feature-based analysis and new norms for Italian , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[18]  Alessandro Lenci,et al.  BLIND: a set of semantic feature norms from the congenitally blind , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[19]  Michael N. Jones,et al.  The semantic richness of abstract concepts , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Typical neural representations of action verbs develop without vision. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  D. Casasanto,et al.  Different Bodies, Different Minds , 2011 .

[22]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Marco Baroni,et al.  A set of semantic norms for German and Italian , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[24]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Modulation of BOLD Response in Motion-sensitive Lateral Temporal Cortex by Real and Fictive Motion Sentences , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Borghi,et al.  Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  D. Rakison,et al.  Infant categorization. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[27]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Category-Specific Organization in the Human Brain Does Not Require Visual Experience , 2009, Neuron.

[28]  W. Maki,et al.  Latent structure in measures of associative, semantic, and thematic knowledge , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Language and simulation in conceptual processing , 2008 .

[30]  William S. Maki,et al.  Judgments of associative memory , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Andrew C. Connolly,et al.  Effect of congenital blindness on the semantic representation of some everyday concepts , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Beyond exemplars and prototypes as memory representations of natural concepts: A clustering approach☆ , 2007 .

[33]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[34]  M. Pérez-Pereira.  Language Development in Blind Children , 2006 .

[35]  Xu Xu,et al.  Content Differences for Abstract and Concrete Concept , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[37]  E. Warrington,et al.  Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Effects of visual deprivation on the organization of the semantic system. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  Ken McRae,et al.  Category - Specific semantic deficits , 2008 .

[41]  J. Kounios,et al.  Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. , 1999 .

[43]  H. Coslett,et al.  Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia , 1994 .

[44]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[45]  J. Keenan,et al.  Imagery in the congenitally blind: how visual are visual images? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  E. Shoben,et al.  Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials , 1983 .

[47]  G. S. Marmor.  Age at onset of blindness and the development of the semantics of color names. , 1978, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[48]  N. Mantel.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[49]  P. Jaccard.  Distribution de la flore alpine dans le bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines , 1901 .