Foundational development of an advanced nuclear reactor integrated safety code.

This report describes the activities and results of a Sandia LDRD project whose objective was to develop and demonstrate foundational aspects of a next-generation nuclear reactor safety code that leverages advanced computational technology. The project scope was directed towards the systems-level modeling and simulation of an advanced, sodium cooled fast reactor, but the approach developed has a more general applicability. The major accomplishments of the LDRD are centered around the following two activities. (1) The development and testing of LIME, a Lightweight Integrating Multi-physics Environment for coupling codes that is designed to enable both 'legacy' and 'new' physics codes to be combined and strongly coupled using advanced nonlinear solution methods. (2) The development and initial demonstration of BRISC, a prototype next-generation nuclear reactor integrated safety code. BRISC leverages LIME to tightly couple the physics models in several different codes (written in a variety of languages) into one integrated package for simulating accident scenarios in a liquid sodium cooled 'burner' nuclear reactor. Other activities and accomplishments of the LDRD include (a) further development, application and demonstration of the 'non-linear elimination' strategy to enable physics codes that do not provide residuals to be incorporated into LIME, (b) significant extensions of the RIOmore » CFD code capabilities, (c) complex 3D solid modeling and meshing of major fast reactor components and regions, and (d) an approach for multi-physics coupling across non-conformal mesh interfaces.« less

[1]  P. Cheng,et al.  Thermal dispersion in a porous medium , 1990 .

[2]  Rodney Cannon Schmidt,et al.  A Multi-Physics Coupling Approach for Integrated Nuclear Reactor Safety Calculations. , 2008 .

[3]  Michael T. Heath,et al.  Common‐refinement‐based data transfer between non‐matching meshes in multiphysics simulations , 2004 .

[4]  R. A. Wigeland.  Effect of a detailed radial core expansion reactivity feedback model on ATWS calculations using SASSYS/SAS4A , 1986 .

[5]  Thomas J. Downar,et al.  Uncertainty in the burnup reactivity swing of liquid-metal fast reactors , 1991 .

[6]  Frank Kreith,et al.  Basic heat transfer , 1980 .

[7]  C. G. Stenberg,et al.  Impact of Nuclear Data Uncertainties on Transmutation of Actinides in Accelerator-Driven Assemblies , 2004 .

[8]  E. E. Morris,et al.  Advanced LMR safety analysis capabilities in the SASSYS-1 and SAS4A computer codes , 1994 .

[9]  Antonio C. M. Sousa,et al.  SIMULATION OF COUPLED FLOWS IN ADJACENT POROUS AND OPEN DOMAINS USING ACONTROL-VOLUME FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD , 2004 .

[10]  James E. Cahalan,et al.  Performance of metal and oxide fuel cores during accidents in large liquid-metal-cooled reactors , 1992 .

[11]  R. C. Schmidt.  Analysis of air ingression into the core region during hypothetical PWR shutdown accidents , 1997 .

[12]  K. E. Washington,et al.  Code manual for CONTAIN 2.0: A computer code for nuclear reactor containment analysis , 1997 .

[13]  Harold C. Edwards,et al.  SIERRA Framework Version 3: Core Services Theory and Design , 2002 .

[14]  K. Hub,et al.  Fast breeder reactors. , 1972, Science.

[15]  Brian E. Thompson,et al.  A Nonequilibrium Finite-Volume Model for Conjugate Fluid/Porous/Solid Domains , 2006 .

[16]  Stefan P. Domino,et al.  SIERRA/Fuego: A Multi-Mechanics Fire Environment Simulation Tool , 2003 .

[17]  T. J. Moran.  Core restraint design for inherent safety , 1988 .

[18]  Ankita Jain.  Efficient Parallel Algorithm for Overlaying Surface Meshes , 2007 .

[19]  Peng Yu,et al.  A numerical method for flows in porous and homogenous fluid domains coupled at the interface by stress jump , 2006 .

[20]  Roger Douglas,et al.  Unfinished business. , 2012, Prescrire international.

[21]  Subir Roychoudhury,et al.  Balance of Plant , 2011 .

[22]  Kambiz Vafai,et al.  Analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer interfacial conditions between a porous medium and a fluid layer , 2001 .

[23]  G. Hofman,et al.  Metallic Fast Reactor Fuels , 2006 .

[24]  William S. Winters.  A New Approach to Modeling Fluid/Gas Flows in Networks , 2001 .

[25]  Martin Tompa,et al.  Figures of merit , 1989, SIGA.

[26]  Homer F. Walker,et al.  Globalization Techniques for Newton-Krylov Methods and Applications to the Fully Coupled Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equations , 2006, SIAM Rev..

[27]  Takeshi Yokoo,et al.  ULOF and UTOP Analyses of a Large Metal Fuel FBR Core Using a Detailed Calculation System , 2001 .

[28]  R. A. Wigeland.  Comparison of the SASSYS/SAS4A radial core expansion reactivity feedback model and the empirical correlation for the FFTF , 1987 .

[29]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  An overview of the Trilinos project , 2005, TOMS.

[30]  P. J. Finck,et al.  Advanced burner test reactor preconceptual design report. , 2008 .

[31]  Frank A. Garner,et al.  Irradiation Performance of Cladding and Structural Steels in Liquid Metal Reactors , 2006 .

[32]  M. K. Moallemi,et al.  Coolant Recirculation in a Pressurized Water Reactor Core Under Loss-of-Coolant Accident Conditions , 1988 .

[33]  R. A. Wigeland,et al.  Radial core expansion reactivity feedback in advanced LMRs: uncertainties and their effects on inherent safety , 1988 .

[34]  Jack J. Dongarra,et al.  An extended set of FORTRAN basic linear algebra subprograms , 1988, TOMS.

[35]  Michael T. Heath,et al.  Overlaying surface meshes, part I: algorithms , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl..

[36]  Thomas J. Downar,et al.  A Liquid-Metal Reactor for Burning Minor Actinides of Spent Light Water Reactor Fuel—II: Nuclear Data Uncertainty Analysis , 1999 .

[37]  John R. Vacca,et al.  Defense in Depth: Firewall Topologies , 2005 .

[38]  Derek Gaston,et al.  MOOSE: A parallel computational framework for coupled systems of nonlinear equations , 2009 .

[39]  Lewis M. Branscomb,et al.  Ease of Use: A System Design Challenge , 1984, IBM Syst. J..

[40]  William Gropp,et al.  Users guide for mpich, a portable implementation of MPI , 1996 .

[41]  Michael T. Heath,et al.  Overlaying surface meshes, part II: topology preservation and feature matching , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl..

[42]  D. Keyes,et al.  Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications , 2004 .