Behavioural hypervolumes of spider communities predict community performance and disbandment

Trait-based ecology argues that an understanding of the traits of interactors can enhance the predictability of ecological outcomes. We examine here whether the multidimensional behavioural-trait diversity of communities influences community performance and stability in situ. We created experimental communities of web-building spiders, each with an identical species composition. Communities contained one individual of each of five different species. Prior to establishing these communities in the field, we examined three behavioural traits for each individual spider. These behavioural measures allowed us to estimate community-wide behavioural diversity, as inferred by the multidimensional behavioural volume occupied by the entire community. Communities that occupied a larger region of behavioural-trait space (i.e. where spiders differed more from each other behaviourally) gained more mass and were less likely to disband. Thus, there is a community-wide benefit to multidimensional behavioural diversity in this system that might translate to other multispecies assemblages.

[1]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Within-group behavioral variation promotes biased task performance and the emergence of a defensive caste in a social spider , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Thomas D Seeley,et al.  Genetic Diversity in Honey Bee Colonies Enhances Productivity and Fitness , 2007, Science.

[3]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Repeatability for Gaussian and non‐Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[4]  S. Riechert,et al.  Genetically-based variation between two spider populations in foraging behavior , 1989, Oecologia.

[5]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Niche, Habitat, and Ecotope , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[6]  A. Sih,et al.  Social Personality Polymorphism and the Spread of Invasive Species: A Model , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[7]  B. Griffen,et al.  Trait-mediated functional responses: predator behavioural type mediates prey consumption. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[8]  M. C. Ferrari,et al.  Behavioural trait variants in a habitat-forming species dictate the nature of its interactions with and among heterospecifics , 2012 .

[9]  A. Sih,et al.  Multilevel selection and effects of keystone hyperaggressive males on mating success and behavior in stream water striders , 2013 .

[10]  Jonathan N. Pruitt,et al.  Animal personality aligns task specialization and task proficiency in a spider society , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Exploring How a Shift in the Physical Environment Shapes Individual and Group Behavior across Two Social Contexts , 2014 .

[12]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Behavioral types as predictors of survival in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2010 .

[13]  M. C. Ferrari,et al.  Intraspecific trait variants determine the nature of interspecific interactions in a habitat-forming species. , 2011, Ecology.

[14]  D. Farine,et al.  Mixed-species associations can arise without heterospecific attraction , 2014 .

[15]  T. Seeley,et al.  Queen promiscuity lowers disease within honeybee colonies , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Behavioural syndromes and their fitness consequences in a socially polymorphic spider, Anelosimus studiosus , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  D. Tilman THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[18]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Personality and collective decision-making in foraging herbivores , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  William Hoppitt,et al.  Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Exploring the effects of individual traits and within-colony variation on task differentiation and collective behavior in a desert social spider , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  Franz J Weissing,et al.  Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Jonathan N Pruitt,et al.  Predator and prey activity levels jointly influence the outcome of long-term foraging bouts. , 2013, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[23]  J. Post,et al.  Rapid depletion of genotypes with fast growth and bold personality traits from harvested fish populations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[25]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Expression of Concern: Spider aggressiveness determines the bidirectional consequences of host–inquiline interactions , 2020, Behavioral Ecology.

[26]  Michael D. Collins,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 Tables S1 and S2 References Plant Genotypic Diversity Predicts Community Structure and Governs an Ecosystem Process , 2022 .

[27]  Jonathan N Pruitt,et al.  Animal personality in a foundation species drives community divergence and collapse in the wild. , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[28]  Orr Spiegel,et al.  When the going gets tough: behavioural type-dependent space use in the sleepy lizard changes as the season dries , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Osman,et al.  Species Diversity and Invasion Resistance in a Marine Ecosystem. , 1999, Science.

[30]  Jonathan Roughgarden,et al.  Niche Width: Biogeographic Patterns Among Anolis Lizard Populations , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[31]  S. Riechert,et al.  A test for correlations among fitness-linked behavioural traits in the spider Agelenopsis aperta (Araneae, Agelenidae) , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  Susanne Foitzik,et al.  Diverse societies are more productive: a lesson from ants , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  T. Perkins,et al.  INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE SOCIAL SPIDER ANELOSIMUS STUDIOSUS (ARANEAE, THERIDIIDAE) AND FOREIGN SPIDERS THAT FREQUENT ITS NESTS , 2007 .

[34]  D. Wilson,et al.  Shy-bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus): An ecological study of a psychological trait. , 1993 .

[35]  S. Ellner,et al.  Rapid prey evolution and the dynamics of two-predator food webs , 2011, Theoretical Ecology.

[36]  Richard Shine,et al.  Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads , 2006, Nature.

[37]  S. Foitzik,et al.  Increased host aggression as an induced defense against slave-making ants , 2011, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[38]  J. Funk,et al.  Revisiting the Holy Grail: using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes , 2017, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[39]  B. Griffen,et al.  The role of individual behavior type in mediating indirect interactions. , 2012, Ecology.

[40]  S. Ellner,et al.  Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system , 2003, Nature.

[41]  Andreas P. Modlmeier,et al.  The keystone individual concept: an ecological and evolutionary overview , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  A. Mcguire,et al.  What is it to be a model? , 2000, HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care.

[43]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[44]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[45]  Sebastian J Schreiber,et al.  How variation between individuals affects species coexistence. , 2016, Ecology letters.

[46]  Iain Barber,et al.  Parasitism and the evolutionary ecology of animal personality , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Susan E. Riechert,et al.  How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Animal personality due to social niche specialisation. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  S. Riechert Prey abundance vs diet breadth in a spider test system , 1991, Evolutionary Ecology.

[50]  A. Bell,et al.  Reciprocal Behavioral Plasticity and Behavioral Types during Predator-Prey Interactions , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[51]  Individual differences in predators but not producers mediate the magnitude of a trophic cascade , 2015, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[52]  A. Carter,et al.  Agamas exhibit behavioral syndromes: bolder males bask and feed more but may suffer higher predation , 2010 .

[53]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Collective decision making and social interaction rules in mixed-species flocks of songbirds , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[55]  J. G. Burns,et al.  Diversity of speed-accuracy strategies benefits social insects , 2008, Current Biology.

[56]  D. Mouillot,et al.  New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[57]  J. Pruitt,et al.  The combined behavioural tendencies of predator and prey mediate the outcome of their interaction , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  H. Akaike Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[59]  Robert E. Kenward,et al.  Wildlife radio tagging : equipment, field techniques and data analysis , 1987 .