Design of an ad-hoc network model for disaster recovery scenario using various routing protocols

Ad-hoc networks are infrastructure less networks and can be established in any environment without pre-existing infrastructure with ease of deployment. The nodes in the network can communicate freely while being in motion. Several routing protocols such as DSR, AODV, and DSDV etc. have been developed for communication in these networks. Ad-hoc networks are especially deployable in situations like disaster management, as we need to act very fast in adverse conditions to save the lives of the victims or minimize losses. In this paper we have analyzed the performance of these protocols for a disaster scenario. We have taken a fixed size terrain 1500x1000m2, organizing it into equal sized symmetrically placed four sub-regions of 500x300m2, each(group of rescue teams) and a few fast moving nodes (communication system on transport vehicles) moving randomly. It is observed form the simulation results that for stable networks performance of proactive protocols is better than reactive protocols in the terms of e-e delay, But with increase in the mobility reactive protocols starts outperforming the proactive protocols. Performance of DSR and AODV is comparable for low mobility and low load scenarios but AODV always performs better than DSR for high load scenarios

[1]  David A. Maltz,et al.  The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4 , 2007, RFC.

[2]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[3]  Gentian Jakllari,et al.  A Comprehensive Comparison of Routing Protocols for Large-Scale Wireless MANETs , 2006, 2006 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[4]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[5]  David B. Johnson,et al.  The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2003 .

[6]  Gil Zussman,et al.  Energy efficient routing in ad hoc disaster recovery networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[7]  Karl F. Rauscher Wireless Emergency Response Team-Final Report for the Sep. 11 2001 NYC WTC Terrorist Attack , 2001 .

[8]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[9]  Bartosz Mielczarek,et al.  Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[10]  Rajendra V. Boppana,et al.  A comparison of TCP performance over three routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[11]  Laura Marie Feeney,et al.  An Energy Consumption Model for Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2001, Mob. Networks Appl..

[12]  Sekharjit Datta,et al.  Performance of CBR and TCP Traffics in Various MANET Environments , 2007 .

[13]  P. Minet,et al.  Energy Efficient Routing , 2009 .

[14]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[15]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.