Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients

Objective To assess the advantages of binaural hearing for cochlear implant (CI) users using a hearing aid (HA) for the contralateral ear. Material and Methods The subjects comprised 3 males and 3 females (age range 48–84 years). All of them had been using a CI and HA for >6 months. Their speech perception was examined in quiet using monosyllables and Japanese Hearing in Noise Test (J-HINT) sentences. Speech perception in noise was examined using J-HINT sentences. Late cortical waves were measured while subjects listened to 1 kHz frequent and 2 kHz target tone stimuli. The latency of the event-related potential (P300) wave was compared for monaural and binaural hearing conditions. Results Three subjects showed significantly better results for binaural than monaural (CI alone) hearing for monosyllables and HINT sentences (p<0.05; paired t-test). Subjects with better speech perception had been using an HA for longer than those with poor performance (18.3 vs 4.0 years). The overall average score was better for binaural than monaural hearing in the speech perception test under quiet and noisy conditions. Comparison of the latency of the P300 wave under monaural and binaural hearing conditions showed a significantly shorter latency for the latter (p=0.02; paired t-test). Conclusion Although the use of an HA alone showed marginal benefit for CI users, binaural hearing (CI + HA) resulted in a significant improvement in speech perception under various circumstances.

[1]  P. Kileny,et al.  Auditory Event-Related Potentials Elicited From Cochlear Implant Recipients and Hearing Subjects. , 1991, American journal of audiology.

[2]  M Matsukawa,et al.  Significance of auditory evoked responses (EABR and P300) in cochlear implant subjects. , 2001, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[3]  R. Plomp A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  T D Carrell,et al.  Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[5]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Three-Month Results with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[7]  G M Clark,et al.  Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[8]  D Byrne,et al.  Clinical Issues and Options in Binaural Hearing Aid Fitting , 1981, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Y. Nageishi,et al.  Effects of discrimination difficulty on cognitive event-related brain potentials in patients with cochlear implants , 1999, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[10]  J. Müller,et al.  Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[11]  K. Kaga,et al.  P300 response to tones and speech sounds after cochlear implant: A case report , 1991, The Laryngoscope.