Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing

This paper investigates the unique challenges of an expanding group of stakeholders making demands upon shared geospatial data resources: non governmental organisations participating in local governance. In spite of efforts to improve local data integration in spatial data infrastructures and development of strategies from public participation GIS to expand access to geospatial data and technologies, grassroots data users still experience difficulties with the accessibility, quality, and usefulness of local government data resources. Drawing from extended ethnographic research conducted in Chicago, Illinois, I illustrate these problems and how they are shaped by grassroots groups' resource constraints, knowledge systems, and socio‐political positions; and assess the feasibility and impacts of proposed alternatives for better meeting grassroots spatial data needs. I contend that the needs and challenges of these stakeholders are unique from those of other users, but are nonetheless rooted in central dilemmas of spatial data handling, and so might be addressed through stronger engagement with GIScience research in this arena.

[1]  J. Pinto,et al.  Information Sharing in an Interorganizational GIS Environment , 2000 .

[2]  D. Flewelling,et al.  White Knights of Spatial Data Infrastructure : The Role and Motivation of Key Individuals , 1999 .

[3]  Nadine Schuurman,et al.  Ontology‐Based Metadata , 2006, Trans. GIS.

[4]  Kevin J. Gaston.  Mapping biodiversity , 2002, Nature.

[5]  Raul P. Lejano,et al.  Mapping the industrial archeology of Boston , 2004 .

[6]  Sarah Elwood.  GIS AND COLLABORATIVE URBAN GOVERNANCE: UNDERSTANDING THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY ACTION AND POWER , 2001 .

[7]  Max Craglia,et al.  Access to Geographic Information: A European Perspective , 2003 .

[8]  John D. Evans.  Organizational and Technological Interoperability for Geographic Information Infrastructures , 1999 .

[9]  D. Martin.  Guest Editorial: Reconstructing Social GIS , 2003 .

[10]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Towards a potential research agenda to guide the implementation of Spatial Data Infrastructures—A case study from India , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Rina Ghose,et al.  Use of Information Technology for Community Empowerment: Transforming Geographic Information Systems into Community Information Systems , 2001, Trans. GIS.

[12]  Gregory Elmes,et al.  Local Knowledge Doesn't Grow on Trees: Community-Integrated Geographic Information Systems and Rural Community Self-Definition , 2004, SDH.

[13]  Eric Shragge,et al.  The New Urban Left: Parties Without Actors , 1998 .

[14]  Michael Barndt,et al.  Public Participation GIS—Barriers to Implementation , 1998 .

[15]  Michael Burawoy,et al.  Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis , 1991 .

[16]  Hans-Jörg Schek,et al.  Interoperating Geographic Information Systems , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[17]  A. Rajabifard,et al.  Future directions for SDI development , 2002 .

[18]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  PPGIS in Community Development Planning: Framing the Organizational Context , 2001, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[19]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Some Implications of the Commodification of Information and the Emerging Information Economy for Applied Geographical Analysis in the United Kingdom , 1987 .

[20]  Brian Martin,et al.  Constructing social action , 2001 .

[21]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  World Status of National Spatial Data Clearinghouses , 2003 .

[22]  R. Lake.  Planning and applied geography: positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems , 1993 .

[23]  Nadine Schuurman,et al.  Flexible Standardization: Making Interoperability Accessible to Agencies with Limited Resources , 2002 .

[24]  Nancy J. Obermeyer,et al.  The Evolution of Public Participation GIS , 1998 .

[25]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of GIS Technology , 1998 .

[26]  R. Lake,et al.  Bring back big government , 2002 .

[27]  David Wilson,et al.  Local Government in the United Kingdom , 1994 .

[28]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  Gis and Spatial Knowledge Production for Neighborhood Revitalization: Negotiating State Priorities and Neighborhood Visions , 2003 .

[29]  Rina Ghose,et al.  Politics of Scale and Networks of Association in Public Participation GIS , 2007 .

[30]  Robert B Mc Master,et al.  Modes of GIS Provision and their Appropriateness for Neighborhood Organizations: Examples from Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota , 2000 .

[31]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Local‐government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Claire Beesley,et al.  Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems , 1996 .

[33]  M. Burawoy.  The Extended Case Method* , 1998 .

[34]  Meg Merrick.  Reflections on PPGIS: A View from the Trenches , 2003 .

[35]  Nadine Schuurman,et al.  Social Perspectives on Semantic Interoperability: Constraints on Geographical Knowledge from a Data Perspective , 2005, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[36]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[37]  Brandon Plewe,et al.  Automated Metadata Interpretation to Assist in the Use of Unfamiliar Gis Data Sources , 1999 .

[38]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  Community Participation and Geographical Information Systems , 2002 .

[39]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Using Ontologies for Integrated Geographic Information Systems , 2002, Trans. GIS.

[40]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Semantic interoperability: A central issue for sharing geographic information , 1999 .

[41]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  The role of sub‐national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[42]  Stacy Warren,et al.  The Utopian Potential of GIS , 2004, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[43]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  GIS and Community-based Planning: Exploring the Diversity of Neighborhood Perspectives and Needs , 1998 .

[44]  S. Elwood.  Beyond Cooptation or Resistance: Urban Spatial Politics, Community Organizations, and GIS-Based Spatial Narratives , 2006 .

[45]  A. Rajabifard,et al.  Developing Spatial Data Infrastructures : From Concept to Reality , 2003 .

[46]  David S. Sawicki,et al.  Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States , 2002 .

[47]  I. Masser,et al.  Gis and Organizations , 2020 .

[48]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  Are SDIs serving the needs of local planning? Case study of Victoria, Australia and Illinois, USA , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[49]  David S. Sawicki,et al.  The Democratization of Data: Bridging the Gap for Community Groups , 1996 .

[50]  Prostitution In Nevada,et al.  ANNALS of the Association of American Geographers , 1974 .

[51]  Robert A. Rundstrom.  GIS, Indigenous Peoples, and Epistemological Diversity , 1995 .

[52]  Harlan J. Onsrud,et al.  The Future of the Spatial Information Infrastructure , 2005 .

[53]  Elise Bright,et al.  Reviving America's Forgotten Neighborhoods: An Investigation of Inner City Revitalization Efforts , 2000 .

[54]  E. Sheppard.  GIS and Society: Towards a Research Agenda , 1995 .

[55]  J. Pickles.  Representations in an Electronic Age: Geography, GIS, and Democracy , 1995 .

[56]  R. Sieber.  Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework , 2006 .

[57]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  Negotiating Knowledge Production: The Everyday Inclusions, Exclusions, and Contradictions of Participatory GIS Research* , 2006 .

[58]  Francis Harvey.  Constructing GIS: Actor Networks of Collaboration , 2001 .