Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives

The arrival of the mobile phone and its rapid and widespread growth may well be seen as one of the most significant developments in the fields of communication and information technology over the past two decades. The aim of this study is to propose a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach to evaluate the mobile phone options in respect to the users' preferences order. Firstly, the most desirable features influencing the choice of a mobile phone are identified. This is realized through a survey conducted among the target group, the experiences of the telecommunication sector experts and the studies in the literature. Two MCDM methods are then used in the evaluation procedure. More precisely, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and the extension of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied to rank the mobile phone alternatives. A case study illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

[1]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Adoption of the Internet and WAP-enabled phones in Singapore , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Terhi-Anna Wilska,et al.  Mobile Phone Use as Part of Young People's Consumption Styles , 2003 .

[3]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  User-oriented design for the optimal combination on product design , 2006 .

[4]  J. Funk.  The future of the mobile phone Internet: an analysis of technological trajectories and lead users in the Japanese market , 2005 .

[5]  Myung Hwan Yun,et al.  Incorporating user satisfaction into the look-and-feel of mobile phone design , 2003, Ergonomics.

[6]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Kumiko Aoki,et al.  An analysis of young people's use of and attitudes toward cell phones , 2003, Telematics Informatics.

[8]  Tonya L. Smith-Jackson,et al.  Systematic evaluation methodology for cell phone user interfaces , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[9]  R. Rice,et al.  Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts , 2003 .

[10]  Jose L. Salmeron,et al.  An AHP-based methodology to rank critical success factors of executive information systems , 2005, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[11]  C. Feng,et al.  Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios , 2000 .

[12]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Schooling the Mobile Generation: The future for schools in the mobile-networked society , 2003 .

[13]  V. M. Rao Tummala,et al.  An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system , 2001 .

[14]  Chi-Wei Lee,et al.  Understanding m-commerce payment systems through the analytic hierarchy process , 2004 .

[15]  Kristen L. Macuga,et al.  Predicting the effects of cellular-phone dialing on driver performance , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[16]  Shang H. Hsu,et al.  Perceptual factors underlying user preferences toward product form of mobile phones , 2001 .

[17]  H. Joseph Wen,et al.  Consumer-based m-commerce: exploring consumer perception of mobile applications , 2005, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[18]  Tony Charlton,et al.  Mobile phone ownership and usage among pre-adolescents , 2004, Telematics Informatics.

[19]  S. Han,et al.  A systematic approach for coupling user satisfaction with product design , 2003, Ergonomics.

[20]  한성호,et al.  Identifying mobile phone design features critical to user satisfaction , 2001 .

[21]  E. Richter,et al.  Cellular telephones and effects on the brain: the head as an antenna and brain tissue as a radio receiver. , 2002, Medical hypotheses.

[22]  Simona Ronchi Della Rocca,et al.  λ Δ -Models , 2004 .

[23]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Evaluation of multicultural factors from elicited customer requirements for new product development , 2003 .

[24]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  A test of the technology acceptance model: the case of cellular telephone adoption , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[26]  Tracy Callaway Russo,et al.  The cocial construction of mobile telephony: an application of the social influence model to perceptions and uses of mobile phones within personal communication networks , 2003 .

[27]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[28]  Yusuf Ziya Özcan,et al.  Research Note: A Need or a Status Symbol? , 2003 .

[29]  Sheng-Hshiung Tsaur,et al.  The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. , 2002 .

[30]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Going wireless: behavior & practice of new mobile phone users , 2000, CSCW '00.

[31]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[32]  Shih-Chi Chang,et al.  Using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate alternative licensing mechanisms , 2005, Inf. Manag..