Temporal-based needle segmentation algorithm for transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy procedures.

PURPOSE Automatic identification of the biopsy-core tissue location during a prostate biopsy procedure would provide verification that targets were adequately sampled and would allow for appropriate intraprocedure biopsy target modification. Localization of the biopsy core requires accurate segmentation of the biopsy needle and needle tip from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy images. A temporal-based TRUS needle segmentation algorithm was developed specifically for the prostate biopsy procedure to automatically identify the TRUS image containing the biopsy needle from a collection of 2D TRUS images and to segment the biopsy-core location from the 2D TRUS image. METHODS The temporal-based segmentation algorithm performs a temporal analysis on a series of biopsy TRUS images collected throughout needle insertion and withdrawal. Following the identification of points of needle insertion and retraction, the needle axis is segmented using a Hough transform-based algorithm, which is followed by a temporospectral TRUS analysis to identify the biopsy-needle tip. Validation of the temporal-based algorithm is performed on 108 TRUS biopsy sequences collected from the procedures of ten patients. The success of the temporal search to identify the proper images was manually assessed, while the accuracies of the needle-axis and needle-tip segmentations were quantitatively compared to implementations of two other needle segmentation algorithms within the literature. RESULTS The needle segmentation algorithm demonstrated a >99% accuracy in identifying the TRUS image at the moment of needle insertion from the collection of real-time TRUS images throughout the insertion and withdrawal of the biopsy needle. The segmented biopsy-needle axes were accurate to within 2.3 +/- 2.0 degrees and 0.48 +/- 0.42 mm of the gold standard. Identification of the needle tip to within half of the biopsy-core length (<10 mm) was 95% successful with a mean error of 2.4 +/- 4.0 mm. Needle-tip detection using the temporal-based algorithm was significantly more accurate (p < 0.001) than the other two algorithms tested, while the segmentation of the needle axis was not significantly different between the three algorithms. CONCLUSIONS The temporal-based needle segmentation algorithm accurately segments the location of the biopsy core from 2D TRUS images of clinical prostate biopsy procedures. The results for needle-tip localization demonstrated that the temporal-based algorithm is significantly more accurate than implementations of some existing needle segmentation algorithms within the literature.

[1]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  A real-time biopsy needle segmentation technique using Hough transform. , 2003, Medical physics.

[2]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[3]  Yan Yan,et al.  Is there a better way to biopsy the prostate? Prospects for a novel transrectal systematic biopsy approach. , 2007, Urology.

[4]  A. Kibel,et al.  Evaluation of a novel precision template‐guided biopsy system for detecting prostate cancer , 2008, BJU international.

[5]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Oblique needle segmentation and tracking for 3D TRUS guided prostate brachytherapy. , 2005, Medical physics.

[6]  Peter Guion,et al.  Initial clinical experience with real‐time transrectal ultrasonography‐magnetic resonance imaging fusion‐guided prostate biopsy , 2008, BJU international.

[7]  Georg Hutarew,et al.  Evaluation of transition zone and lateral sextant biopsies for prostate cancer detection after initial sextant biopsy. , 2003, Urology.

[8]  A Fenster,et al.  An algorithm for automatic needle localization in ultrasound-guided breast biopsies. , 2000, Medical physics.

[9]  D. Downey,et al.  Needle and seed segmentation in intra-operative 3D ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[10]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Design and evaluation of a 3D transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[11]  P. Choyke,et al.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[12]  P V HOUGH GENERAL PURPOSE VISUAL INPUT FOR A COMPUTER * , 1962, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry,et al.  Prostate biopsies guided by three-dimensional real-time (4-D) transrectal ultrasonography on a phantom: comparative study versus two-dimensional transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies , 2007, European urology.

[14]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Robert Rohling,et al.  Methods for segmenting curved needles in ultrasound images , 2006, Medical Image Anal..