Beginning in the mid-1970s and continuing through the 1980s and into the early 1990s governments in the industrialized democracies have brought about tremendous changes in their own State structures and in the relationship between the State and society. In the United States we refer to the “Reagan revolution,” but the changes have been no less profound in other countries, including those such as France and Sweden with very large and well-respected bureaucracies. While these changes in the nature of government are well-known and well-documented, their implications for the implementation and management of the public sector have not been explored adequately, especially in comparative context.(1) To the extent that the implications have been discussed it has been primarily in the context of the “new managerialism” but the changes really extend much more deeply into the process of governing and the manner in which the State relates to society. This paper will be a step in the direction of more fully ramifying ...
[1]
Johan P. Olsen.
Rethinking and Reforming the Public Sector
,
1992
.
[2]
Fruit René.
Varii Auctores - Economie policy in our time. Vol. I: General theory, 476p. Vol. II et II: Country studies
,
1966
.
[3]
P. Kemp.
Next Steps for the British Civil Service
,
1990
.
[4]
K. Woodside.
Policy Instruments and the Study of Public Policy
,
1986,
Canadian Journal of Political Science.
[5]
B. Peters.
Morale in the Public Service: A Comparative Inquiry
,
1991
.
[6]
Robert A. Dahl,et al.
Politics, Economics, and Welfare.
,
1953
.
[7]
Keith G. Provan,et al.
Institutional-level norms and organizational involvement in a service-implementation network
,
1991
.
[8]
W. Niskanen.
Bureaucracy and representative government
,
1971
.
[9]
B. Peters,et al.
Can Government Go Bankrupt
,
1979
.