Bayesian Persuasion with Heterogeneous Priors

In a world in which rational individuals may hold different prior beliefs, a sender can influence the behavior of a receiver by controlling the informativeness of an experiment (public signal). We characterize the set of distributions of posterior beliefs that can be induced by an experiment, and provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a sender to benefit from persuasion. We then provide sufficient conditions for the sender to benefit from persuasion for almost every pair of prior beliefs, even when there is no value of persuasion under a common prior. Our main condition is that the receiver's action depends on his beliefs only through his expectation of some random variable.

[1]  Navin Kartik,et al.  Opinions as Incentives , 2009, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Anthony M. Bertelli The Political Economy of Public Sector Governance , 2012 .

[3]  Matthew Gentzkow,et al.  Costly Persuasion , 2013 .

[4]  Ricardo Alonso,et al.  Persuading Voters , 2015 .

[5]  Anton Kolotilin,et al.  Optimal Information Disclosure: Quantity vs. Quality , 2014 .

[6]  Maxim Ivanov,et al.  Informational control and organizational design , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[7]  W. Whitt A Note on the Influence of the Sample on the Posterior Distribution , 1979 .

[8]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  WAITING TO PERSUADE , 2004 .

[9]  E. Steen,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4553-05 August 2005 On the Origin of Shared Beliefs ( and Corporate Culture ) , 2005 .

[10]  Matthew Gentzkow,et al.  Disclosure of endogenous information , 2017 .

[11]  D. Blackwell,et al.  Merging of Opinions with Increasing Information , 1962 .

[12]  Anton Kolotilin Experimental design to persuade , 2015, Games Econ. Behav..

[13]  Polly S Nichols,et al.  Agreeing to disagree. , 2005, General dentistry.

[14]  Larry L. Orr,et al.  Social Experiments: Evaluating Public Programs With Experimental Methods , 1998 .

[15]  Ricardo Alonso,et al.  Political Disagreement and Information in Elections , 2016, Games Econ. Behav..

[16]  Isabelle Brocas,et al.  Influence through ignorance , 2007 .

[17]  Yahel Giat,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty, Heterogeneous Beliefs and Agency Conflicts , 2008 .

[18]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Bayesian Persuasion , 2009, World Scientific Series in Economic Theory.

[19]  E. Steen Rational Overoptimism (and Other Biases) , 2004 .

[20]  David Gill,et al.  Sequential Decisions with Tests , 2008, Games Econ. Behav..

[21]  John Duggan,et al.  A Spatial Theory of Media Slant and Voter Choice , 2011 .

[22]  Ehud Kalai,et al.  Weak and Strong Merging of Opinions , 1994 .

[23]  E. Steen,et al.  Interpersonal Authority in a Theory of the Firm (This paper is currently being revised) , 2007 .

[24]  E. Steen,et al.  Authority versus Persuasion , 2009 .

[25]  S. Morris The Common Prior Assumption in Economic Theory , 1995, Economics and Philosophy.

[26]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications , 1981 .

[27]  Simone Galperti,et al.  Hide or Surprise? Persuasion without Common-Support Priors , 2015 .

[28]  Alexander V. Hirsch Experimentation and Persuasion in Political Organizations , 2016, American Political Science Review.

[29]  Stephen Morris,et al.  TRADE WITH HETEROGENEOUS PRIOR BELIEFS AND ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION , 1994 .

[30]  Eric Van den Steen,et al.  Overconfidence by Bayesian-Rational Agents , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Search, Obfuscation, and Price Elasticities on the Internet , 2004 .

[32]  George Loewenstein,et al.  The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  David Gill,et al.  The Optimal Choice of Pre-Launch Reviewer , 2011, J. Econ. Theory.

[34]  Jesse M. Shapiro,et al.  Media Bias and Reputation , 2005, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  Muhamet Yildiz,et al.  Public Disagreement , 2009 .

[36]  Andrew J. Patton,et al.  Why do forecasters disagree? Lessons from the term structure of cross-sectional dispersion , 2010 .