The relationship of perceptions and emotions to behavior in the face of collective inequality

The present experiment investigated the role of emotions and perceptions in determining the overt behavior of disadvantaged group members. Three limitations to the existing psychological research are presented as a possible reason for the present inability to describe a consistent relationship between the emotions and perceptions of those faced with intergroup inequalities and their subsequent actions. The present experiment attempted to address these limitations by employing a laboratory paradigm in which subjects actually engage in overt behavior. As well, a broader array of emotions and perceptions were assessed and subjects were offered a variety of behaviors from which to choose. The findings point to a relatively strong relationship between emotions and perceptions on the one hand, and overt action on the other. Feelings of frustration and anger, the perception of one's personal treatment as satisfactory and just, and hope of future improvement of one's position combined to discriminate between subjects who accepted their disadvantaged position, those who took normative forms of action, those who reacted in an individual nonnormative way, and those who chose collective nonnormative behavior.

[1]  Glenn L. McConagha,et al.  The American soldier , 1949 .

[2]  E. Suchman,et al.  The American soldier: Adjustment during army life. (Studies in social psychology in World War II), Vol. 1 , 1949 .

[3]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[4]  James A. Davis,et al.  A Formal Interpretation of the Theory of Relative Deprivation , 1959 .

[5]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[6]  H. Wilensky.  The moonlighter : a product of relative deprivation , 1963 .

[7]  T. Burns,et al.  Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England , 1966 .

[8]  T. J. Crawford,et al.  Relative deprivation, powerlessness, and militancy: the psychology of social protest. , 1970, Psychiatry.

[9]  T. Gurr,et al.  Why Men Rebel. , 1970 .

[10]  C. Mcphail,et al.  Civil disorder participation: a critical examination of recent research. , 1971, American sociological review.

[11]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Race and Relative Deprivation in the Urban United States , 1972 .

[12]  Isaac Kraminick.  Reflections on Revolution: Definition and Explanation in Recent Scholarship , 1972 .

[13]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[14]  B. Grofman,et al.  The Strange Case of Relative Gratification and Potential for Political Violence: The V-Curve Hypothesis , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[15]  E. Walster,et al.  REACTIONS TO CONFIRMATIONS AND DISCONFIRMATIONS OF EXPECTANCIES OF EQUITY AND INEQUITY , 1974 .

[16]  F. Crosby,et al.  A model of egoistical relative deprivation. , 1976 .

[17]  R. Abeles.  Relative Deprivation, Rising Expectations, and Black Militancy , 1976 .

[18]  Abraham H. Miller,et al.  The J-Curve Theory and the Black Urban Riots: An Empirical Test of Progressive Relative Deprivation Theory , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[19]  T. Cook,et al.  The construct validity of relative deprivation , 1977 .

[20]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  J. Traupmann,et al.  Equity: Theory and Research , 1978 .

[22]  A. deCarufel,et al.  Evaluation of outcome improvement resulting from threats and appeals. , 1979 .

[23]  F. Crosby,et al.  An empirical examination of relative deprivation theory , 1980 .

[24]  C. Rusbult.  Commitment and Satisfaction in Romantic Associations: A Test of the investment Model , 1980 .

[25]  André De Carufel.  The Allocation and Acquisition of Resources in Times of Scarcity , 1981 .

[26]  Forrest W. Young.  Quantitative analysis of qualitative data , 1981 .

[27]  R. C. Tripathi,et al.  Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes , 1981 .

[28]  Ursula Dibble.  Socially Shared Deprivation and the Approval of Violence: Another Look at the Experience of American Blacks durinq the 1960s. , 1981 .

[29]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Justice Motive in Social Behavior , 1981 .

[30]  Faye J. Crosby,et al.  Relative deprivation and working women , 1982 .

[31]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Interpreting and Coping with Threat in the Context of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[32]  Serge Guimond,et al.  Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition–emotion distinction and the personal–group deprivation issue. , 1983 .

[33]  David M. Messick,et al.  Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives , 1983 .

[34]  Robert Folger,et al.  Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. , 1983 .

[35]  Christopher L. Martin,et al.  Relative deprivation and referent cognitions , 1983 .

[36]  P. Brickman,et al.  Moral outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collective action ☆ , 1984 .

[37]  Joanne D. Martin,et al.  Catalysts for Collective Violence , 1984 .

[38]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique , 1984 .

[39]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Perceived qualifications, resource abundance, and resentment about deprivation☆ , 1984 .

[40]  R. Folger,et al.  Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. , 1984 .

[41]  M. Mark.  Expectations, procedural justice, and alternative reactions to being deprived of a desired outcome , 1985 .

[42]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[43]  James M. Olson,et al.  Relative deprivation and social comparison , 1986 .

[44]  Christopher L. Martin,et al.  Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects , 1986 .

[45]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Review of Theories of Intergroup Relations: International Social Psychological Perspectives , 1987 .

[46]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Disadvantaged group responses to perceived inequality: from passive acceptance to collective action , 1987 .

[47]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Homogeneity analysis withk sets of variables: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features , 1988 .

[48]  M. Hill,et al.  Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. , 1990 .

[49]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest , 1990 .