Discharge in air in contact with water: influence of electrical conductivity on the characteristics and the propagation dynamics of the discharge

Due to the high reactivity and the non-thermal properties of streamer discharges, they are applied in various fields, such as water treatment and medicine. Streamer discharges are usually produced in the gas phase before interacting with a liquid or solid surface. Although the dynamics of a streamer discharge in gases is well described, its propagation at liquid surfaces remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigate the influence of water electrical conductivity (σ), between 2 and 1000 µS cm−1, on the characteristics and propagation dynamics of pulsed positive DC nanosecond discharges with the solution serving as a cathode. σ strongly influences τ r (the dielectric relaxation time), and two discharge modes may be obtained, depending on whether τ r is shorter or longer than the delay to achieve breakdown (τ pulse). This latter can be indirectly modified by adjusting the voltage amplitude (V a). In the case of V a = 14 kV, the breakdown voltage (V bd) at low σ is lower than that measured at high σ, probably because τ pulse < τ r and > τ r, respectively. In the case of V a = 20 kV, V bd decreases slightly with σ, probably because of the decrease of the resistivity of the global electrical circuit as τ pulse ∼ τ r for high σ. In addition to the electrical characterization, the dynamics of the discharge at the solution’s surface is investigated using 1 ns-time-resolved imaging. Its morphology was found to evolve from a disc to a ring before it splits into highly organized plasma dots (streamers’ head). The number (N dots) and propagation velocity of plasma dots are determined as a function of σ. At V a = 14 kV, N dots does not vary significantly with σ despite the increase of V bd; this latter likely compensates the neutralization of charge accumulated at the surface by ions in solution. In the case of V a = 20 kV, N dots decreases with σ, and it can be related to a decrease of accumulated charge at the water surface. Finally, based on the electrical measurements, we found that the charge per plasma dot (Q dot) increases with σ, which does not correlate with the imaging results that show a short length of propagation at high σ. Then, considering the plasma dot mobility at low σ and the instantaneous propagation velocities at high σ, a more realistic Q dot is measured.

[1]  P. Bruggeman,et al.  Self-organized patterns at the plasma–liquid anode interface in a helium glow discharge: temporal development and mechanisms , 2022, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[2]  J. Margot,et al.  Influence of voltage and gap distance on the dynamics of the ionization front, plasma dots, produced by nanosecond pulsed discharges at water surface , 2022, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[3]  T. von Woedtke,et al.  Conductivity augments ROS and RNS delivery and tumor toxicity of an argon plasma jet. , 2022, Free radical biology & medicine.

[4]  J. Diamond,et al.  Dynamics of a pulsed negative nanosecond discharge on water surface and comparison with the positive discharge , 2021 .

[5]  J. Foster,et al.  The variation in self-organized anode plasma pattern structure with solution electrolyte type in 1 atm DC glow discharge , 2021, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[6]  L. Stafford,et al.  Time-resolved imaging of pulsed positive nanosecond discharge on water surface: plasma dots guided by water surface , 2020, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[7]  J. Foster,et al.  Propagation of positive discharges in an air bubble having an embedded water droplet , 2020 .

[8]  N. Babaeva,et al.  Ion energies delivered by negative and positive ionization waves to flat dielectric surfaces , 2020, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[9]  D. J. Economou,et al.  Numerical simulation of streamer evolution in surface dielectric barrier discharge with electrode-array , 2020, Journal of Applied Physics.

[10]  J. Margot,et al.  Time and space-resolved imaging of an AC air discharge in contact with water , 2020, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics.

[11]  U. Ebert,et al.  The physics of streamer discharge phenomena , 2020, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[12]  Y. Akishev,et al.  Surface ionization wave propagation in the nanosecond pulsed surface dielectric barrier discharge: the influence of dielectric material and pulse repetition rate , 2020, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[13]  D. Go,et al.  Turing patterns on a plasma-liquid interface , 2019, Plasma Sources Science and Technology.

[14]  Y. Akishev,et al.  Numerical simulation of streamer spreading over the water surface , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[15]  J. Foster,et al.  Optical Emission Spectroscopy Investigation of a 1-atm DC Glow Discharge With Liquid Anode and Associated Self-Organization Patterns , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[16]  C. Canal,et al.  Important parameters in plasma jets for the production of RONS in liquids for plasma medicine: A brief review , 2019, Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering.

[17]  B. Locke,et al.  The influence of liquid conductivity on electrical breakdown and hydrogen peroxide production in a nanosecond pulsed plasma discharge generated in a water-film plasma reactor , 2018, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics.

[18]  T. Dufour,et al.  Self-organized patterns by a DC pin liquid anode discharge in ambient air: Effect of liquid types on formation , 2018, Physics of Plasmas.

[19]  M. Kushner,et al.  Interaction of positive streamers in air with bubbles floating on liquid surfaces: conductive and dielectric bubbles , 2018 .

[20]  C. Bailly,et al.  Plasma-activation of tap water using DBD for agronomy applications: Identification and quantification of long lifetime chemical species and production/consumption mechanisms. , 2017, Water research.

[21]  D. Go,et al.  Electrostatic Debye layer formed at a plasma-liquid interface. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[22]  Cheng Zhang,et al.  Propagation of Surface Ionization Wave in NS-Pulse Dielectric Barrier Discharge in Atmospheric Pressure Air* , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS).

[23]  Y. Akishev,et al.  Propagation of positive streamers on the surface of shallow as well as deep tap water in wide and narrow dielectric channels , 2016 .

[24]  M. Kushner,et al.  Branching and path-deviation of positive streamers resulting from statistical photon transport , 2014 .

[25]  Ryo Ono,et al.  Two-dimensional simulation of fast gas heating in an atmospheric pressure streamer discharge and humidity effects , 2014 .

[26]  L. Jingjing,et al.  Contrasting Behaviours of AC and DC Excited Plasmas in Contact with Liquid , 2013 .

[27]  M. Keidar,et al.  Cold atmospheric plasma in cancer therapy , 2013 .

[28]  S. Uchida,et al.  Self-Organized Anode Pattern on Surface of Liquid or Metal Anode in Atmospheric DC Glow Discharges , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[29]  J. Foster,et al.  Observations of electric discharge streamer propagation and capillary oscillations on the surface of air bubbles in water , 2011 .

[30]  Qiaogen Zhang,et al.  The effect of conductivity on streamer initiation and propagation between dielectric-coated sphere-plate electrodes in water , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[31]  Mark J. Kushner,et al.  Structure of positive streamers inside gaseous bubbles immersed in liquids , 2009 .

[32]  O. Ducasse,et al.  Experimental analysis and modelling of positive streamer in air: towards an estimation of O and N radical production , 2008 .

[33]  You-nian Wang,et al.  Conical DC Discharge in Ambient Air Using Water as an Electrode , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[34]  S. Celestin Study of the dynamics of streamers in air at atmospheric pressure , 2008 .

[35]  U. Ebert,et al.  Diffusion correction to the Raether–Meek criterion for the avalanche-to-streamer transition , 2006 .

[36]  P. Secker Charge injection into a liquid dielectric by means of x rays , 1965 .