Gastrointestinal reported outcomes following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass based on a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES To describe gastrointestinal-related side-effects reported following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB). METHODS A multicenter study among OAGB patients across Israel (n=277) and Portugal (n=111) who were recruited to the study based on time elapsed since surgery was performed. An online survey with information on demographics, anthropometrics, medical conditions, and gastrointestinal outcomes was administered in both countries simultaneously. RESULTS Respondents from Israel (pre-surgery age of 41.6±11.0 years, 75.8% females) and Portugal (pre-surgery age of 45.6±12.3 years, 79.3% females) presented mean excess weight loss of 51.0±19.9 and 62.4±26.5%, 89.0±22.0 and 86.2±21.4%, and 89.9±23.6 and 98.2±20.9% (P<0.001 for both countries), at 1-6 months, 6-12 months, and 1-5 years post-surgery, respectively. Median Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale score was similar between time elapsed since surgery groups among respondents from Israel and Portugal (≤1.97 and ≤2.12). A notable proportion of respondents from Israel and Portugal at all time points reported 1-3 bowel movements per day (≤62.8 and ≤87.6%), Bristol stool scale categories which represent diarrhea-like stools (≤51.9 and ≤56.3%), having discomfort due to flatulence (≤79.4 and ≤90.2%), and mild to severe dyspepsia symptoms (≤50.5 and ≤73.0%). CONCLUSIONS A notable proportion of OAGB patients might experience certain gastrointestinal symptoms postoperatively, including flatulence, dyspepsia, and diarrhea-like stools.

[1]  S. Pouwels,et al.  Surgical Management of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass — a Systematic Review , 2022, Obesity Surgery.

[2]  Syed Imran Abbas,et al.  Patient Selection in One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass—an Expert Modified Delphi Consensus , 2022, Obesity Surgery.

[3]  B. Abiri,et al.  Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Weight Loss, Postoperative Complications, and Remission of Comorbidities in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2022, Obesity Surgery.

[4]  J. Himpens,et al.  IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) , 2021, Obesity Surgery.

[5]  L. Tapsell,et al.  Changes in Anthropometric Measures, Nutritional Indices and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Compared with Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) , 2021, Obesity Surgery.

[6]  J. Himpens,et al.  The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes? , 2021, Obesity Surgery.

[7]  T. Sinai,et al.  Nutritional Assessment and Preparation for Adult Bariatric Surgery Candidates: Clinical Practice. , 2020, Advances in nutrition.

[8]  Fusun Ozmen,et al.  The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Exocrine Pancreatic Function , 2020, Obesity Surgery.

[9]  N. Petrucciani,et al.  One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm: Weight Loss, Nutritional Outcomes, Endoscopic Results, and Quality of Life at 8-Year Follow-Up , 2020, Obesity Surgery.

[10]  M. Abdelgawad,et al.  Protein Energy Malnutrition After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb ≤200 cm: A Case Series. , 2020, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[11]  S. Tolone,et al.  Biliopancreatic Limb Length in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Which Is the Best? , 2020, Obesity Surgery.

[12]  A. Szold,et al.  Nutritional status following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass. , 2020, Clinical nutrition.

[13]  J. Aronson,et al.  STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery. , 2019, International journal of surgery.

[14]  O. Khan,et al.  Retrospective cohort study of 925 OAGB procedures. The UK MGB/OAGB Collaborative Group: A commentary. , 2019, International journal of surgery.

[15]  A. Khalaj,et al.  Protein-Calorie Malnutrition Requiring Revisional Surgery after One-Anastomosis-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Case Series from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS) , 2019, Obesity Surgery.

[16]  D. Raptis,et al.  Tailored One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 3-Year Outcomes of 94 Patients , 2018, Obesity Surgery.

[17]  J. Himpens,et al.  Bariatric Surgery Worldwide: Baseline Demographic Description and One-Year Outcomes from the Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018 , 2018, Obesity Surgery.

[18]  A. Ford,et al.  Insights into the evaluation and management of dyspepsia: recent developments and new guidelines , 2018, Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology.

[19]  M. Boaz,et al.  The effect of a multispecies probiotic on microbiota composition in a clinical trial of patients with diarrhea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome , 2018, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[20]  C. Parmar,et al.  One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass Is Now an Established Bariatric Procedure: a Systematic Review of 12,807 Patients , 2018, Obesity Surgery.

[21]  S. Brethauer,et al.  Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. , 2015, Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery.

[22]  G. Silecchia,et al.  Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms , 2013, Obesity Surgery.

[23]  Arya M. Sharma,et al.  Health status, quality of life, and satisfaction of patients awaiting multidisciplinary bariatric care , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[24]  I. Wiklund,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in dyspepsia: A six-country study , 2008, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[25]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. , 2000, Spine.

[26]  M. Camilleri,et al.  Functional gastroduodenal disorders , 1999, Gut.

[27]  A. Lembo,et al.  Characterizing Normal Bowel Frequency and Consistency in a Representative Sample of Adults in the United States (NHANES) , 2018, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[28]  I. Wiklund,et al.  Relevance of norm values as part of the documentation of quality of life instruments for use in upper gastrointestinal disease. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Supplement.