Inaction Inertia: Foregoing Future Benefits as a Result of an Initial Failure to Act

The circumstances under which initial inaction tends to persist were studied. Inaction inertia occurs when bypassing an initial action opportunity decreases the likelihood that subsequent similar action opportunities will be taken. The authors studied the case in which an initial attractive action opportunity, which is not taken, is followed by another positive but somewhat less attractive action opportunity. In 6 experiments, participants were less likely to take the second action when the discrepancy in attractiveness between the initial and final action opportunities was relatively large, compared with small-discrepancy participants or control participants, who were offered only the second opportunity. This finding was obtained using both a scenario methodology and an actual experimental situation. Possible explanations for inaction inertia based on perceptual contrast, dissonance, selfperception, or commitment theories were tested but were not clearly supported. Experiment 6, however, indicated that framing the initial inaction as a loss plays an important mediating role in producing inaction inertia

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: Commitment then cost. , 1978 .

[2]  J. Brehm Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  N. Roese The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking , 1994 .

[4]  J. Freedman,et al.  ATTITUDINAL EFFECTS OF INADEQUATE JUSTIFICATION. , 1963, Journal of personality.

[5]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Judgments of Affect , 1990 .

[6]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[7]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[8]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[9]  J. Cooper,et al.  A New Look at Dissonance Theory , 1984 .

[10]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[11]  Scott T. Allison,et al.  The Feature-Positive Effect, Attitude Strength, and Degree of Perceived Consensus , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[12]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[13]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Commission, Omission, and Dissonance Reduction: Coping with Regret in the "Monty Hall" Problem , 1995 .

[14]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The experience of regret: what, when, and why. , 1995, Psychological review.

[15]  D. Bem Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. , 1967, Psychological review.

[16]  R. A. Wicklund,et al.  Perspectives on cognitive dissonance , 1976 .

[17]  K. Markman,et al.  The Mental Simulation of Better and Worse Possible Worlds , 1993 .

[18]  I. Newton,et al.  Isaac Newton's Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica , 1973 .

[19]  J. Freedman,et al.  Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  G. H. Lunney,et al.  USING ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE WITH A DICHOTOMOUS DEPENDENT VARIABLE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1970 .

[21]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[22]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing? , 1982 .

[23]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[24]  Joseph P. Newman,et al.  The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. , 1980 .

[25]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .