Fraud related to EU funds. The case of Romania

"According to the latest PIF report on the protection of the financial interests of the European Union, in 2021 Romania reported to the European Commission fraud related to European projects worth 1.4 billion euros. The reported amount is quite impressive as it represents over 80% of the total amounts reported as being fraudulently obtained in 2021 by all member states, making Romania a true performer in this regard at the European level. Starting from these values, using descriptive statistics, the study analyzes the data reported by Romania in the last ten years, compared to the other EU member states, data extracted from the PIF Reports (2012-2021), trying to verify if Romania's status as a champion in terms of fraud with European funds is fully deserved or circumstantial. Although the numbers show that Romania is indeed a performer in this regard, both in terms of value and the number of reported cases, these values must be viewed in context, as they are influenced by a wide series of factors, including reporting errors, the capacity and willingness of member states to detect irregularities, as well as the particularities of the awarding procedures and contracting periods. Also, in the end, the paper presents some recommendations for strengthening efforts to combat the phenomenon of fraud related to EU funds in Romania."

[1]  M. Achim,et al.  Economic and Financial Crime , 2020 .

[2]  Cristian Incaltarau,et al.  Evaluating the Determinants of EU Funds Absorption across Old and New Member States – the Role of Administrative Capacity and Political Governance , 2020 .

[3]  L. King,et al.  Perils of development funding? The tale of EU Funds and grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe , 2019 .

[4]  Robert W. McGee The Ethics of Tax Evasion , 2019, The Political Morality of the Late Scholastics.

[5]  B. Tóth,et al.  Innovations in Objectively Measuring Corruption in Public Procurement , 2018, Oxford Scholarship Online.

[6]  L. King,et al.  An Objective Corruption Risk Index Using Public Procurement Data , 2016 .

[7]  J. Tosun Absorption of Regional Funds: A Comparative Analysis , 2014 .

[8]  Jörg Rocholl,et al.  Politically Connected Boards of Directors and the Allocation of Procurement Contracts , 2012 .

[9]  E. Auriol,et al.  Public Procurement and Rent-Seeking: The Case of Paraguay , 2011 .

[10]  A. Schrank,et al.  Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  Lucio Picci,et al.  Proposal for a New Measure of Corruption, Illustrated with Italian Data , 2005 .

[12]  Martin Paldam,et al.  The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics , 2002 .

[13]  Robert W. McGee Why Do People Evade Taxes? Summaries of 80 Surveys , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  Financial Crime in Romania: A Community Pulse Survey , 2023, SpringerBriefs in Finance.

[15]  Robert W. McGee The Ethics of Tax Evasion: Summaries of 21 Studies , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Robert W. McGee The Ethics of Bribery: Summaries of 28 Studies , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.