Measurement of radiographic joint space width in the tibiofemoral compartment of the osteoarthritic knee: comparison of standing anteroposterior and Lyon schuss views.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate progression of joint space narrowing in radiographs of osteoarthritic (OA) knees imaged in both the standing anteroposterior (AP) and the Lyon schuss positions, using alternative methods to measure joint space width (JSW). METHODS Standing AP (extended view) and Lyon schuss (posteroanterior [PA] view, with 20-30 degrees of flexion) radiographic images of 58 OA knees were obtained twice (at baseline and 2 years later). With both methods, fluoroscopy was used to align the anterior and posterior margins of the medial or lateral tibial plateau with the central x-ray beam. Minimum JSW, mean JSW, and joint space area (JSA) of the medial or lateral femorotibial joint space were measured using a new digital image analysis system. The effects of knee flexion versus extension and parallel versus nonparallel tibial plateau alignment were evaluated with respect to the reproducibility of JSW in repeated examinations (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), the mean of within-knee standard deviations of repeated measurements (SD(m)), and the sensitivity to changes in JSW in serial radiographs (standardized response mean [SRM]). RESULTS The performance of the new software, as assessed by the reproducibility of repeated measurements of minimum JSW on the same image, was excellent in both the standing AP (ICC = 0.98) and Lyon schuss radiographs (2 SD(m) = 0.5 mm, ICC = 0.98). The reproducibility in different radiographs of the same knee was not evaluated. However, over 2 years, the mean (+/- SD) decrease in the minimum JSW of OA knees was 0.17 +/- 0.75 mm in standing AP radiographs (P not significant) and 0.24 +/- 0.50 mm in Lyon schuss views (P = 0.007), with SRMs of 0.23 and 0.48, respectively. The quality of alignment of the tibial plateau was satisfactory (<1 mm between anterior and posterior margins of the medial tibial plateau) in 66% of the pairs of Lyon schuss radiographs and in 57% of the pairs of standing AP radiographs. In the Lyon schuss radiographs, SRM was highly dependent on tibial plateau alignment. Minimum JSW was more sensitive to change than was mean JSW or JSA, in paired Lyon schuss radiographs that exhibited satisfactory alignment. CONCLUSION Compared with the standing AP radiograph, PA imaging of the knee in 20-30 degrees flexion (the schuss position) increases the reproducibility of radiographic JSW measurements in OA knees and the sensitivity to change in JSW in serial radiographs. Sensitivity to change in minimum JSW is notably increased by aligning the medial tibial plateau with the central x-ray beam in the Lyon schuss radiograph.

[1]  M. Dougados,et al.  Assessment of joint space width in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a comparison of 4 measuring instruments. , 1996, The Journal of rheumatology.

[2]  K. Brandt,et al.  Effect of alignment of the medial tibial plateau and x-ray beam on apparent progression of osteoarthritis in the standing anteroposterior knee radiograph. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  E. Vignon,et al.  Quantitative measurement of joint space narrowing progression in hip osteoarthritis: a longitudinal retrospective study of patients treated by total hip arthroplasty. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[4]  E. Vignon,et al.  Which is the best radiographic protocol for a clinical trial of a structure modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis? , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.

[5]  R. Altman,et al.  A 5-year randomized controlled, double-blind study of glycosaminoglycan polysulphuric acid complex (Rumalon) as a structure modifying therapy in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. , 2000, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  Nicholas Bellamy,et al.  Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis : Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritic Research Society , 1996 .

[8]  Eric Lejeune,et al.  Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Dougados,et al.  Measurement of the radiological hip joint space width. An evaluation of various methods of measurement. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[10]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Clinical trials design: structure modifying agents for osteoarthritis. Future guidelines: areas for development. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  K. Brandt,et al.  Is conventional radiography suitable for evaluation of a disease-modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis? , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  M. Dougados,et al.  Evaluation of the structure-modifying effects of diacerein in hip osteoarthritis: ECHODIAH, a three-year, placebo-controlled trial. Evaluation of the Chondromodulating Effect of Diacerein in OA of the Hip. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  M. Dougados,et al.  Knee joint space width measurement: an experimental study of the influence of radiographic procedure and joint positioning. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[15]  R. Hirsch,et al.  Hip osteoarthritis prevalence estimates by three radiographic scoring systems. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  E. Vignon,et al.  Radiographic assessment of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Recommendations: recommended guidelines. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[17]  Dacre Je,et al.  THE AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT OF KNEE RADIOGRAPHS IN OSTEOARTHRITIS USING DIGITAL IMAGE ANALYSIS , 1989 .

[18]  E Vignon,et al.  Quantitative assessment of radiographic normal and osteoarthritic hip joint space. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[19]  J C Buckland-Wright,et al.  Accuracy and precision of joint space width measurements in standard and macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees. , 1995, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[20]  M Lequesne,et al.  Guidelines for testing slow acting drugs in osteoarthritis. , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[21]  E. Vignon,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of joint space width in femorotibial osteoarthritis: comparison of three radiographic views. , 1998, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.