A Multicriteria Decision Model for Venture Capital Firms’ Evaluation of New Technology Business Firms

New Technology Business Firms are known to be volatile dynamic organizations whose innovations are subject to short life cycles and product imitability. Venture capitalist firms who allocate funds to these start-ups need to evaluate multiple facets associated with the individual firm’s internal and external characteristics, as well as, its own unique objectives and goals. This study applies a multicriteria decision making model to the identification for venture capital firms of potential New Technology Business Firms who are requesting capital infusions.

[1]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  An expert module to improve the consistency of AHP matrices , 2004 .

[2]  A. Cooper Strategic management: New ventures and small business , 1981 .

[3]  Ingemar Wictor,et al.  Innovative Internationalisation in New firms: Born Globals–the Swedish Case , 2003 .

[4]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms , 1996 .

[5]  S. Hariharan,et al.  Performance measurement of intensive care services in hospitals: the case of Barbados , 2004, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[6]  Ilan Alon,et al.  International Market Selection for a Small Enterprise: A Case Study in International Entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[7]  O. Williamson Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[8]  H. Gemünden,et al.  The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success , 2004 .

[9]  Haisu Zhang,et al.  Managing Knowledge for Innovation: The Role of Cooperation, Competition, and Alliance Nationality , 2010 .

[10]  Alfredo J. Mauri,et al.  The Influence Of Technology On Strategic Alliances: An Application Of The Utterback And Abernathy Model Of Product And Process Innovation , 1999 .

[11]  H. Etemad Internationalization of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A Grounded Theoretical Framework and an Overview , 2009 .

[12]  Igor H.Ansoff Strategic Management , 1979 .

[13]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[14]  N. Coviello The network dynamics of international new ventures , 2006 .

[15]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[16]  Gordon C. Murray,et al.  The International Market Entry Choices of Start-Up Companies in High-Technology Industries , 2000 .

[17]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[18]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A subjective assessment of alternative mission architectures for the human exploration of Mars at NASA using multicriteria decision making , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Bringing Personalized Ties back in: Their Added Value for Biotech Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists Interorganizational Networks , 2011 .

[20]  Eileen Fischer,et al.  The Influence of the Management Team's International Experience on the Internationalization Behaviors of SMES , 1997 .

[21]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[22]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  A better way to innovate. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[23]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[24]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[25]  S. Sammut Valuation Methods in Early-Stage Biotechnology Enterprises: The “Venture Capital Method†at Work , 2012 .

[26]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  Measuring network competence: some international evidence (Измерение компетенции сети фирм: несколько международных примеров) , 2002 .

[27]  Ksenia Podoynitsyna,et al.  Success Factors in New Ventures: A Meta-analysis , 2007 .

[28]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents , 2003 .

[29]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[30]  José Santos,et al.  From global to metanational: how companies win in the knowledge economy , 2001, UBIQ.

[31]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[32]  Elizabeth G. Pontikes Two Sides of the Same Coin , 2012 .

[33]  F. Evangelista Qualitative Insights into the International New Venture Creation Process , 2005 .

[34]  D. Sharma,et al.  The internationalization process of Born Globals: a network view , 2003 .

[35]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[36]  P. Ensign Small Business Strategy as a Dynamic Process: Concepts, Controversies, and Implications , 2008 .

[37]  Jim Bell,et al.  Rapid internationalisation among entrepreneurial firms in Australia, Canada, Ireland and New Zealand: An extension to the network approach , 2006 .