The Effect of Two Church-based Interventions on Breast Cancer Screening Rates Among Medicaid-Insured Latinas

Introduction Latinas face disparities in cancer screening rates compared with non-Latina whites. The Tepeyac Project aims to reduce these disparities by using a church-based approach to increase breast cancer screening among Latinas in Colorado. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of two Tepeyac Project interventions on the mammogram rates of Latinas and non-Latina whites enrolled in the Medicaid fee-for-service program. Methods Two intervention groups were compared: 209 churches in Colorado that received educational printed materials in Spanish and English (the printed statewide intervention) and four churches in the Denver area that received personalized education from promotoras, or peer counselors (the promotora intervention), in addition to the printed statewide intervention. Biennial Medicaid mammogram claim rates in Colorado before the interventions (1998–1999) and after (2000–2001) were used to compare the effect of the interventions on mammogram use among Latinas and non-Latina whites aged 50 to 64 years who were enrolled in the Medicaid fee-for-service program. Adjusted rates were computed using generalized estimating equations. Results Small, nonsignificant increases in screening were observed among Latinas exposed to the promotora intervention (from 25% at baseline to 30% at follow-up [P = .30]) as compared with 45% at baseline and 43% at follow-up for the printed statewide intervention (P = .27). Screening among non-Latina whites increased by 6% in the promotora intervention area (from 32% at baseline to 38% at follow-up [P = .40]) and by 3% in the printed statewide intervention (from 41% at baseline to 44% at follow-up [P = .02]). No significant disparities in breast cancer screening were detected between Latinas and non-Latina whites. After adjustment for the confounders by generalized estimating equations, the promotora intervention had a marginally greater impact than the printed statewide intervention in increasing mammogram use among Latinas (generalized estimating equation, P = .07). Conclusion A personalized community-based education was only modestly effective in increasing breast cancer screening among Medicaid-insured Latinas. Education alone may not be the answer for this population. The barriers for these Medicaid enrollees must be investigated so that interventions can be tailored to address their needs.

[1]  M. Gammon,et al.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas and non-Latina whites. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[2]  A. Sauaia,et al.  Are low-income elderly patients at risk for poor diabetes care? , 2004, Diabetes care.

[3]  R. Roetzheim,et al.  Breast Cancer Detection and Outcomes in a Disability Beneficiary Population , 2002, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[4]  E. Flagg,et al.  Influence of usual source of care on differences by race/ethnicity in receipt of preventive services , 2002, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  L I Iezzoni,et al.  Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[6]  N. Ahmed,et al.  Difficulty in Reaching Low-Income Women for Screening Mammography , 2000, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[7]  S. A. George,et al.  BARRIERS TO BREAST CANCER SCREENING: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW , 2000, Health care for women international.

[8]  J Z Ayanian,et al.  Effects of health insurance and race on early detection of cancer. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  M. Clark,et al.  Screening for breast and cervical cancers: the importance of knowledge and perceived cancer survivability. , 1999, Women & health.

[10]  J. Horm,et al.  Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: the utility of ecological analysis using the National Health Interview Survey. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[11]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Por La Vida model intervention enhances use of cancer screening tests among Latinas. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[12]  M. Lobell,et al.  Barriers to cancer screening in Mexican-American women. , 1998, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  D. A. Goldman,et al.  Why a peer intervention program for Mexican-American women failed to modify the secular trend in cancer screening. , 1997, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  L. Iezzoni Assessing Quality Using Administrative Data , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  L. Suarez,et al.  Knowledge, behavior, and fears concerning breast and cervical cancer among older low-income Mexican-American women. , 1997, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  C. P. Brown,et al.  The urban church and cancer control: a source of social influence in minority communities. , 1994, Public health reports.

[17]  L. Suarez Pap smear and mammogram screening in Mexican-American women: the effects of acculturation. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[18]  G. Marks,et al.  Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventive services by Hispanics: findings from HHANES 1982-84. , 1990, American journal of public health.

[19]  A. Zaloznik Breast cancer stage at diagnosis: Caucasians versus Hispanics , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[20]  H. Anton-Culver,et al.  Survival differences in breast cancer among racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. , 1999, Cancer detection and prevention.

[21]  A. Davidson,et al.  Factors associated with screening mammography in low-income women. , 1996, American journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  J. Elder,et al.  Mobilizing churches for health promotion in Latino communities: Compañeros en la Salud. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.