Low risk of thrombosis and serious embolic events despite low-intensity anticoagulation. Experience with 1,004 Medtronic Hall valves.

One thousand four Medtronic Hall valves (601 mitral, 398 aortic, and five tricuspid) were implanted in 847 patients between December 1979 and June 1987. Total experience at the end of June 1987 was 2,640 patient-years of follow-up. Prothrombin time ratios were reviewed for all patients (16,866 observations), and these ratios were found to be therapeutically low (median international normalized ratio, 2.6) and highly variable (lower 10th percentile, 1.6; upper 10th percentile, 3.9). During the follow-up period, there were no valvular thromboses; the 95% confidence limit for the risk of thrombosis (0.14 per 100 patient-years) is below that reported for other mechanical prostheses. Sixty percent of all thromboembolic events left no residual deficit, and 75% of all bleeding events did not require treatment. Only 11% of thromboembolic events and 7% of bleeding events were fatal. The linearized rate of fatal bleeding was 0.2% per year, and the linearized rate of moderate to severe bleeding was 0.5% per year. Five-year actuarial embolic-free rates were 92%, 84%, and 83% for aortic, mitral, and double valves, respectively. The low risk of valvular thrombosis and of serious thromboembolic events in the Medtronic Hall valve, regardless of the range and variability of anticoagulation, offers greater patient safety than other mechanical prostheses, provides a credible alternative to bioprostheses, and may be particularly relevant to third-world populations.

[1]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  Twenty-five year experience with Starr-Edwards heart valves: follow-up methods and results. , 1988, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[2]  A. Marty Heart Valve Replacement and Future Trends in Cardiac Surgery , 1988 .

[3]  M. Antunes,et al.  Medtronic Hall valve replacement in a third-world population group. A review of the performance of 1000 prostheses. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  L. Edmunds,et al.  Thrombotic and bleeding complications of prosthetic heart valves. , 1987, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  D. Nicoloff,et al.  St. Jude Medical prosthesis: valve-related deaths and complications. , 1987, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  C. Oakley,et al.  Ten-year clinical evaluation of isolated mitral valve and double-valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards prostheses. , 1987, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  C. Oakley,et al.  Ten year clinical evaluation of Starr-Edwards 2400 and 1260 aortic valve prostheses. , 1987, British heart journal.

[8]  M. Carrier,et al.  Clinical and hemodynamic assessment of the Omniscience prosthetic heart valve. , 1987, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  G. Rábago,et al.  Reoperations for left-sided low-profile mechanical prosthetic obstructions. , 1987, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  D. Cooley,et al.  Durability and low thrombogenicity of the St. Jude Medical valve at 5-year follow-up. , 1986, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  B. Gersh,et al.  Issues concerning the clinical evaluation of new prosthetic valves. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  N. Kouchoukos,et al.  Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  S. Nitter‐Hauge,et al.  Seven and one-half years' experience with the Medtronic-Hall valve. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  G Thiene,et al.  Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  A 6 year experience with the St. Jude medical valve: hemodynamic performance, surgical results, biocompatibility and follow-up. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  L. Edmunds,et al.  Clinical comparison of St. Jude and porcine aortic valve prostheses. , 1985, Circulation.

[17]  J. Fabiani,et al.  Comparative evaluation of aortic valve replacement with Starr, Björk, and porcine valve prostheses. , 1985, Circulation.

[18]  D. McGoon The risk of thromboembolism following valvular operations: how does one know? , 1984, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Thromboembolic and haemorrhagic risk in mechanical and biological aortic prostheses. , 1984, European heart journal.

[20]  J. Dawes,et al.  The platelet release reaction in cardiovascular disease: evaluation of plasma betathromboglobulin as a marker of a prothrombotic state. , 1984, European heart journal.

[21]  R. Dewall,et al.  Factors influencing thromboembolic complications in Omniscience cardiac valve patients. , 1984, European heart journal.

[22]  R. Carlier,et al.  Mitral valve replacement with St Jude Medical prosthesis. Incidence of thromboembolic events in 349 patients. , 1984, European heart journal.

[23]  J. Relland,et al.  Comparative evaluation of mitral valve repair and replacement with Starr, Björk, and porcine valve prostheses. , 1984, Circulation.

[24]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis. A two-year follow-up of 150 patients. , 1984, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  J. Ross,et al.  Clinical and echocardiographic evaluation of the St. Jude cardiac valve prosthesis: follow-up of 126 patients. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  Performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards Model 1260 aortic valve prosthesis beyond ten years. , 1984, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[27]  U. Kaul,et al.  Thrombotic obstruction of Bjork-Shiley valves--diagnostic and surgical considerations. , 1984, International journal of cardiology.

[28]  C. Pinson,et al.  Thrombosis of mechanical cardiac valves: a qualitative comparison of the silastic ball valve and the tilting disc valve. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  N. Kouchoukos,et al.  Early results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley convexoconcave prosthesis. , 1984, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[30]  W. Daggett,et al.  Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[31]  L. Fananapazir,et al.  Results of valve replacement with the Omniscience prosthesis. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[32]  Incidence of stroke in Oxfordshire: first year's experience of a community stroke register. , 1983, British medical journal.

[33]  D Horstkotte,et al.  Late complications in patients with Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement. , 1983, Circulation.

[34]  N. Kouchoukos,et al.  Late results after mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley and porcine prostheses. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[35]  M. Antunes,et al.  Medtronic-Hall Valve Replacement in a Third World Population Group , 1983, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[36]  G. Murray,et al.  Clinical Experience with the Hall Pivoting Disk Valve , 1983, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[37]  V. Fuster,et al.  Systemic thromboembolism in valvular heart disease and prosthetic heart valves. , 1982, Modern concepts of cardiovascular disease.

[38]  E. Bodnar,et al.  Assessment and comparison of the performance of cardiac valves. , 1982, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[39]  L. Edmunds,et al.  Thromboembolic complications of current cardiac valvular prostheses. , 1982, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[40]  RISKS OF LONG-TERM ORAL ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION Second Report of the Sixty Plus Reinfarction Study Research Group , 1982, The Lancet.

[41]  Forbes Cd Thrombosis and artificial surfaces. , 1981, Clinics in haematology.

[42]  L. Núñez,et al.  Entrapment of leaflet of St. Jude medical cardiac valve prosthesis by miniscule thrombus: report of two cases. , 1980, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[43]  J. Forfar A 7-year analysis of haemorrhage in patients on long-term anticoagulant treatment. , 1979, British heart journal.

[44]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  An improved statistical method for assessing the results of operation. , 1975, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[45]  L. Elveback,et al.  Transient cerebral ischemic attacks in a community. Rochester, Minnesota, 1955 through 1969. , 1973, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[46]  E. Butchart,et al.  Anticoagulation variability between centres: implications for comparative prosthetic valve assessment. , 1988, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[47]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Ten-year analysis of the Björk-Shiley standard aortic valve. , 1987, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[48]  J. Coles,et al.  Six year clinical study of use of the Omniscience valve prosthesis in 219 patients. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  W. Jamieson Bioprostheses are superior to mechanical prostheses. , 1986, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[50]  J. Skyttä,et al.  Long-term follow-up of Björk-Shiley mitral valve replacement. 10 years' experience. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[51]  G. Fraedrich,et al.  Five-years actuarial analysis after heart valve replacement with the St. Jude medical prosthesis. , 1986, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[52]  Bamford Jm The classification and natural history of acute cerebrovascular disease. , 1986 .

[53]  W. Tan,et al.  Clinical assessment of the St. Jude medical cardiac prosthesis. A 5-year experience. , 1986, The American surgeon.

[54]  A. Wøien,et al.  An improved pivotal disc-type prosthetic heart valve. , 1979, Journal of the Oslo city hospitals.