Evaluating Services for People with Disabilities

No single evaluation method, or method of directing organizational change, can cope with every issue faced when evaluating, or intervening in, service systems for people with disabilities. By identifying the strengths as well as the weaknesses of various methods, we might find that they complement one another. This paper explores this complementarity of different methods, pointing the way to a more flexible, responsive and critically aware evaluation and change practice. A framework of four methods is presented: PASS/ING, Viable System Diagnosis, Strategic Assumption Surfacing and Testing, and Soft Systems Methodology. These may be used in conjunction with one another to address a variety of ethical and organizational issues in the evaluation and change of service systems for people with disabilities.

[1]  Wendy Gregory,et al.  Critical systems thinking and pluralism : a new constellation , 1992 .

[2]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[3]  M. Snowdon.  The Heart of Enterprise , 1979 .

[4]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  The road to emancipation is through organizational development: A critical evaluation of total systems intervention , 1993 .

[5]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Towards a System of Systems Methodologies , 1984 .

[6]  J. Wholey.  Evaluation and effective public management , 1983 .

[7]  G. Midgley.  Dealing with coercion: Critical Systems Heuristics and beyond , 1997 .

[8]  Walter B. Weimer.  Notes on the methodology of scientific research , 1979 .

[9]  John Holt,et al.  Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings , 1992 .

[10]  G. Midgley.  The Ideal of Unity and the Practice of Pluralism in Systems Science , 1996 .

[11]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  What Is This Thing Called CRITICAL Systems Thinking , 1995 .

[12]  Robert L. Flood.  Liberating Systems Theory , 1990 .

[13]  John Mingers,et al.  Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy , 1983 .

[14]  M. C. Jackson,et al.  Cybernetics and organization theory: a critical review , 1988 .

[15]  S. Beer.  The Brain of the Firm , 1972 .

[16]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[17]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Beyond a System of Systems Methodologies , 1990 .

[18]  Robert L. Flood,et al.  Critical Systems Thinking , 1996 .

[19]  G. Bateson,et al.  Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity , 1979 .

[20]  A. Gregory,et al.  Organisational evaluation : a complementarist approach , 1994 .

[21]  E. Zigler,et al.  From theory to practice in the care and education of mentally retarded individuals. , 1990, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[22]  F. Sontag,et al.  Wholeness and the Implicate Order , 1983 .

[23]  R. Kilmann.  A Dialectical Approach to Formulating and Testing Social Science Theories: Assumptional Analysis , 1983 .

[24]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Churchman's “process of unfolding”—Its significance for policy analysis and evaluation , 1988 .

[25]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Evaluating organizations: A systems and contingency approach , 1992 .

[26]  Ann Taket,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. , 1991 .

[27]  J. Oliga.  Methodological foundations of systems methodologies , 1988 .

[28]  R. Flood,et al.  Critical systems thinking : current research and practice , 1996 .

[29]  Y. I. Kim.  [General systems theory]. , 1989, Taehan kanho. The Korean nurse.

[30]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[31]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Diagnosing the system for organizations: S. BEER Wiley, Chichester, 1985, 152 + xiii pages, £7.50 , 1986 .

[32]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[33]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Systems methodology for the management sciences , 1992 .

[34]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[35]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Assumptional analysis: An elucidation and appraisal for systems practitioners , 1989 .

[36]  M. Burton.  Understanding mental health services : theory and practice , 1983 .

[37]  Graham Watson,et al.  Evaluating quality in services for disabled and older people , 1995 .

[38]  B. Perrin,et al.  Setting the Record Straight: A Critique of Some Frequent Misconceptions of the Normalization Principle. , 1985 .

[39]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[40]  Colin Eden,et al.  Messing about in problems , 1983 .

[41]  Robert L. Flood,et al.  Enhancing the process of methodology choice in total systems intervention (TSI) and improving chances of tackling coercion , 1995 .

[42]  C. Churchman.  The systems approach and its enemies , 1979 .

[43]  Bengt Nirje.  The Normalization Principle and Its Human Management Implications , 1994 .

[44]  Norman Jackson,et al.  In Defence of Paradigm Incommensurability , 1991 .

[45]  J. R. Beaumont.  Diagnosing the System for Organizations , 1985 .

[46]  M. Jackson,et al.  New Directions in Management Science , 1987 .

[47]  Wolf P. Wolfensberger,et al.  The principle of normalization in human services , 1996 .

[48]  Amanda Gregory,et al.  Critical Reflections on the Past, Present and Future Development of Organisational Evaluation , 1995 .

[49]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[50]  Amanda Gregory,et al.  Which Evaluation Methodology When? A Contingency Approach to Evaluation , 1991 .

[51]  G. Midgley.  Pluralism and the legitimation of systems science , 1992 .

[52]  R. B. Lindsay,et al.  Essays 1958-1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge , 1987 .

[53]  R. Mason.  Challenging strategic planning assumptions , 1981 .

[54]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Evaluation Methodologies: A System for Use , 1992 .