Sampling-based learning control for quantum systems with hamiltonian uncertainties

Robust control design for quantum systems has been recognized as a key task in the development of practical quantum technology. In this paper, we present a systematic numerical methodology of sampling-based learning control (SLC) for control design of quantum systems with Hamiltonian uncertainties. The SLC method includes two steps of “training” and “testing and evaluation”. In the training step, an augmented system is constructed by sampling uncertainties according to possible distributions of uncertainty parameters. A gradient flow based learning and optimization algorithm is adopted to find the control for the augmented system. In the process of testing and evaluation, a number of samples obtained through sampling the uncertainties are tested to evaluate the control performance. Numerical results demonstrate the success of the SLC approach. The SLC method has potential applications for robust control design of quantum systems.

[1]  I. Petersen,et al.  Sliding mode control of quantum systems , 2009, 0911.0062.

[2]  Claus Kiefer,et al.  Quantum Measurement and Control , 2010 .

[3]  M. R. James,et al.  Risk-sensitive optimal control of quantum systems , 2004 .

[4]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Sampling-based learning control of inhomogeneous quantum ensembles , 2013, 1308.1454.

[5]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Sliding mode control of two-level quantum systems , 2010, Autom..

[6]  M.R. James,et al.  $H^{\infty}$ Control of Linear Quantum Stochastic Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Robust Control Pulses Design for Electron Shuttling in Solid-State Devices , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  F. Nori,et al.  Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits , 2011, Nature.

[9]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Control of Linear Quantum Stochastic Systems , 2007 .

[10]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[11]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and future , 2009, 0912.5121.

[12]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Robust control of quantum information , 2003, quant-ph/0307062.

[13]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  The Gradient Flow for Control of Closed Quantum Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[15]  F. Nori,et al.  Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits , 2013 .

[16]  Bo Qi A Two-step Strategy for Stabilizing Control of Quantum Systems with Uncertainties ? , 2014 .

[17]  I. Petersen,et al.  Optimal Lyapunov-based quantum control for quantum systems , 2012, 1203.5373.

[18]  Guofeng Zhang,et al.  LQG/H∞ control of linear quantum stochastic systems , 2015, 2015 34th Chinese Control Conference (CCC).

[19]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  Gradient algorithm applied to laboratory quantum control , 2009 .

[20]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Notes on sliding mode control of two-level quantum systems , 2012, Autom..

[21]  Bo Qi A two-step strategy for stabilizing control of quantum systems with uncertainties , 2013, Autom..

[22]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Modeling and Control of Quantum Systems: An Introduction , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[23]  James Lam,et al.  Control Design of Uncertain Quantum Systems With Fuzzy Estimators , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[24]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Quantum control theory and applications: A survey , 2009, IET Control Theory & Applications.