Crystallinity of Cellulose and Its Significance for the Fiber Properties

The subject of this paper is treated mainly from the standpoint of cotton cellulose. The concept of crystallinity is discussed not simply in the narrow sense of degree of crystallinity but in the broader sense, which involves the whole fine structure of cellulose. With respect to crystallinity in the latter sense, there are four main factors, each involving a mean value and a distribution of values, both mathematical and spatial. These parameters, independent within certain limits, are (1) the nature of the crystal lattice, (2) the percentage of crystalline ma terial, (3) the size of the crystallites, and (4) the orientation of the crystallites. A well- planned analysis of covariance between these factors and the important physical properties of cotton would be desirable. This would be a task of considerable magnitude even if other variables not directly related to crystallinity, such as molecular size and morphology, were not active. In the absence of such an analysis it is still possible to show the marked influence of some of these parameters on certain of the important physical properties of cotton. The relation of physical properties to the crystalline modification has been pointed out frequently by a com parison of the properties of the native fibers with those of regenerated fibers or with those of mercerized fibers. However, the changes in the percentage of crystalline material which usually occur in these transformations have not been evaluated exactly, and the conclusions drawn from previous studies should probably be checked. Decreased crystallinity and higher content of amorphous cellulose is symbatic with in creased elongation, increased moisture regain, and increased chemical reactivity. Of particular interest in the last category is the special case of hydrolysis, a reaction in which it is possible that crystallization may occur. Data on the third parameter, the size of the crystallite, are too scanty to permit any con clusions to be drawn. A study of this factor will have to wait on improved methods for meas uring the size and size-distribution of the crystalline areas. The increase of fiber strength and of refractive index with improved orientation has been well established. A decrease in elongation usually accompanies this.

[1]  P. Hermans,et al.  Change in crystallinity upon heterogeneous acid hydrolysis of cellulose fibers , 1949 .

[2]  P. Hermans,et al.  X‐ray studies on the crystallinity of cellulose , 1949 .

[3]  A. Heyn.  Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering in Various Cellulose Fibers and Its Relation to the Micellar structure , 1949 .

[4]  J. A. Howsmon.  Water Sorption and the Poly-Phase Structure of Cellulose Fibers , 1949 .

[5]  L. Hermanne,et al.  Interpretation of the Mechanical Behavior of Rayon , 1949 .

[6]  M. E. Simpson,et al.  Degree of Polymerization, Spiral Structure, and Strength of Cotton Fiber , 1948 .

[7]  W. Rees.  30—THE HEAT OF ABSORPTION OF WATER BY CELLULOSE , 1948 .

[8]  G. V. Merola,et al.  Degree of Polymerization of Cellulose in Cotton Fibers , 1948 .

[9]  P. Hermans,et al.  Quantitative X-Ray Investigations on the Crystallinity of Cellulose Fibers. A Background Analysis , 1948 .

[10]  H. Mark,et al.  Rate of Exchange of Cellulose with Heavy Water , 1948 .

[11]  H. Mark,et al.  CRYSTALLINITY OF HYDRO-CELLULOSES , 1948 .

[12]  R. C. Waller,et al.  Structure and Properties of Regenerated Cellulose , 1948 .

[13]  E. Pacsu.  Recent Developments in the Structural Problem of Cellulose , 1948 .

[14]  M. L. Nelson,et al.  Crystallinity of Cellulose Fibers as Determined by Acid Hydrolysis , 1947 .

[15]  O. Battista,et al.  Hydrolysis of Native Versus Regenerated Cellulose Structures , 1947 .

[16]  H. Wakeham,et al.  A calorimetric investigation of moisture in textile fibers. , 1947, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  P. Hermans,et al.  On the transformation of cellulose II into cellulose IV , 1946 .

[18]  P. H Hermans,et al.  The hydrates of cellulose , 1946 .

[19]  P. H. Hermans.  Contribution to the physics of cellulose fibres , 1946 .

[20]  A. Scroggie,et al.  Chemical Characterization of Rayon Yarns and Cellulosic Raw Materials. , 1945 .

[21]  H. Mark,et al.  X‐Ray Studies of Chain Polymers , 1944 .

[22]  R. H. Haas,et al.  A Study of the Amorphous Portion of Dry, Swollen Cellulose by an Improved Thallous Ethylate Method1,2 , 1944 .

[23]  S. Siggia,et al.  Kinetics of Oxidation of Cellulose with Periodic Acid , 1943 .

[24]  G. Davidson.  9—THE RATE OF CHANGE IN THE PROPERTIES OF COTTON CELLULOSE UNDER THE PROLONGED ACTION OF ACIDS , 1943 .

[25]  R. Mease,et al.  Effect of purification treatments on cotton and rayon , 1938 .

[26]  Elmer O. Kraemer,et al.  MOLECULAR WEIGHTS OF CELLULOSES AND CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES , 1938 .

[27]  C. Conrad,et al.  Some Possibilities and Limitations of X-Ray Methods for Measuring the Strength of Raw Cotton , 1938 .

[28]  Wayne A. Sisson,et al.  X-Ray Analysis of Textile Fibres Part V. Relation of Orientation to Tensile Strength of Raw Cotton , 1937 .

[29]  D. R. Morey.  The Micellar Arrangement in Various Cellulose Fibres , 1934 .

[30]  G. Clark,et al.  X-Ray Method for Quantitative Comparison of Crystalline Orientation in Cellulose Fibers , 1933 .

[31]  D. R. Morey.  The Measurement of Molecular Orientation in Fibres , 1933 .

[32]  H. Mark,et al.  XVIII. Über Form und Größe der Mizelle von Zellulose und Kautschuk , 1929 .