Scripting, control, and privacy in domestic smart grid technologies: insights from a Danish pilot study

Abstract Smart grid research in Denmark has increasingly turned its focus on aggregator trading flexibility achieved by remotely controlling appliances, studying the technologies involved rather than the control. This paper investigates how different types of control were envisioned and designed for a two-year smart grid trial in Denmark with 20 private households. Using the notion of script, processes of in- and de-scription were used to gain insights into perceived and enacted control. Based on empirical data from 26 interviews and three workshops, we show how the in-scription process of control can be characterized as dynamic and includes negotiations between the residents and those responsible for the project. Second, we show how users de-script control, and third, we outline the project owners’ reaction to the user’s de-scription of control. The design of the remote control appears to have promoted a preference for ‘passive consumers' within a smart grid. This design prompts questions about how the users in smart grid development are envisioned and configured using different ideas about control. With current development and the need for additional energy reductions, consumers who invest in photovoltaic solar cells and electric vehicles lose interest in delivering their energy to the system level.

[1]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Smart grid: hope or hype? , 2015, Energy Efficiency.

[2]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Defrosting the Freezer: From Novelty to Convenience , 2000 .

[3]  Steven K. Firth,et al.  Smart homes, control and energy management: how do smart home technologies influence control over energy use and domestic life? , 2015 .

[4]  Liisa Annukka Mäkinen,et al.  Surveillance ON/OFF. Examining home surveillance systems from the user's perspective. , 2016 .

[5]  Bettina Hauge Lives under the Sun , 2015 .

[6]  E. Langer The illusion of control. , 1975 .

[7]  Conny Bakker,et al.  Do home energy management systems make sense? Assessing their overall lifecycle impact , 2013 .

[8]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[9]  Kornelia Konrad,et al.  Dynamics of Type-based Scenarios of Use: Opening Processes in Early Phases of Interactive Television and Electronic Marketplaces , 2008 .

[10]  Scripts in transition: Protective spaces of Indonesian biofuel villages , 2015 .

[11]  B. Latour Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[12]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[13]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  Feeding back about eco-feedback: How do consumers use and respond to energy monitors? , 2014 .

[14]  John Thøgersen,et al.  The importance of framing for consumer acceptance of the Smart Grid: A comparative study of Denmark, Norway and Switzerland , 2014 .

[15]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  The role of Smart Grids to foster energy efficiency , 2013 .

[16]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[17]  Bettina Hauge,et al.  The air from outside: Getting to know the world through air practices , 2013 .

[18]  Kirsten Gram‐Hanssen,et al.  House, home and identity from a consumption perspective , 2004 .

[19]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[20]  Kjetil Fallan,et al.  De-scribing Design: Appropriating Script Analysis to Design History , 2008, Design Issues.

[21]  Inge Røpke,et al.  Energy impacts of the smart home - conflicting visions , 2011 .

[22]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Potential carbon impacts of smart grid development in six European countries , 2013 .

[23]  M. Aune Energy comes home , 2007 .

[24]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Scenarios for the development of smart grids in the UK: synthesis report , 2014 .

[25]  Lea Schick,et al.  Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—A study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy , 2015 .

[26]  G. Verbong,et al.  Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy , 2013 .

[27]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? , 2013 .

[28]  S. Nyborg Pilot users and their families - inventing flexible practices in the smart grid , 2015 .

[29]  N. Marres The Environmental Teapot and Other Loaded Household Objects: Reconnecting the Politics of Technology, Issues and Things , 2012 .

[30]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies , 1992 .

[31]  B. Sovacool What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[32]  A. Mattozzi,et al.  A Depasteurization of Italy? Mediations of Consumption and the Enrollment of Consumers within the Raw-Milk Network , 2012 .

[33]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[34]  Peter-Paul Verbeek,et al.  Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things , 2011 .

[35]  M. Z. A. Ab-Kadir,et al.  The present and future of smart power grid in developing countries , 2014 .

[36]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management , 2014 .

[37]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[38]  Stefano Paolo Corgnati,et al.  Smart meters and energy savings in Italy: Determining the effectiveness of persuasive communication in dwellings , 2014 .

[39]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Principles of Smart Home Control , 2006, UbiComp.

[40]  Gesche M. Huebner,et al.  Exploring perceived control in domestic electricity demand-side response , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[41]  B. Joerges Do Politics Have Artefacts? , 1999 .

[42]  Jaap Jelsma,et al.  Innovating for Sustainability: Involving Users, Politics and Technology , 2003 .

[43]  Dana Abi Ghanem,et al.  Designing consumer engagement with the smart grids of the future: bringing active demand technology to everyday life , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[44]  Gavin J. D. Smith,et al.  Exploring Relations between Watchers and Watched in Control(led) Systems: Strategies and Tactics ∗ , 2002 .