A common conjugate prior structure for several randomized response models

In this paper we present a common Bayesian approach to four randomized response models, including Warner's (1965) and other modification for it that appeared thereafter in the literature. Suitable truncated beta distributions are used throughout in a common conjugate prior structure to obtain the Bayes estimates for the proportion of a “sensitive” attribute in the population of interest. The results of this common conjugate prior approach are contrasted with those of Winkler and Franklin's (1979), in which non-conjugate priors have been used in the context of Warner's model. The results are illustrated numerically in several cases and exemplified further with data reported in Liu and Chow (1976) concerning incidents of induced abortions.

[1]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[2]  Arijit Chaudhuri,et al.  Using randomized response from a complex survey to estimate a sensitive proportion in a dichotomous finite population , 2001 .

[3]  V. R. Padmawar,et al.  Randomized response revisited , 2000 .

[4]  George E. Policello,et al.  A comparison of two randomized response survey methods with consideration for the level of respondent protection , 1977 .

[5]  P T Liu,et al.  The efficiency of the multiple trial randomized response technique. , 1976, Biometrics.

[6]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Warner's Randomized Response Model: A Bayesian Approach , 1979 .

[7]  S L Warner,et al.  Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. , 1965, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[8]  Jay L. Devore A note on the randomized response technique , 1977 .

[9]  Bernard G. Greenberg,et al.  Randomized Response: a Data-Gathering Device for Sensitive Questions , 1976 .

[10]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques , 1987 .

[11]  On an Estimation Problem in Warner's Randomized Response Technique , 1978 .

[12]  Naurang Singh Mangat,et al.  An alternative randomized response procedure , 1990 .

[13]  W. R. Simmons,et al.  The Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model: Theoretical Framework , 1969 .

[14]  Naurang Singh Mangat,et al.  On Moors' Randomized Response Model , 1993 .

[15]  Do They Lie? , 1981 .

[16]  Damaraju Raghavarao,et al.  A test for detecting untruthful answering in randomized response procedures , 1992 .

[17]  Albert K. Tsui,et al.  Procuring honest responses indirectly , 2000 .

[18]  Paul E. Tracy,et al.  Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys , 1986 .