Microfluidic blood–brain barrier model provides in vivo‐like barrier properties for drug permeability screening

Efficient delivery of therapeutics across the neuroprotective blood–brain barrier (BBB) remains a formidable challenge for central nervous system drug development. High‐fidelity in vitro models of the BBB could facilitate effective early screening of drug candidates targeting the brain. In this study, we developed a microfluidic BBB model that is capable of mimicking in vivo BBB characteristics for a prolonged period and allows for reliable in vitro drug permeability studies under recirculating perfusion. We derived brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and cocultured them with rat primary astrocytes on the two sides of a porous membrane on a pumpless microfluidic platform for up to 10 days. The microfluidic system was designed based on the blood residence time in human brain tissues, allowing for medium recirculation at physiologically relevant perfusion rates with no pumps or external tubing, meanwhile minimizing wall shear stress to test whether shear stress is required for in vivo‐like barrier properties in a microfluidic BBB model. This BBB‐on‐a‐chip model achieved significant barrier integrity as evident by continuous tight junction formation and in vivo‐like values of trans‐endothelial electrical resistance (TEER). The TEER levels peaked above 4000 Ω · cm2 on day 3 on chip and were sustained above 2000 Ω · cm2 up to 10 days, which are the highest sustained TEER values reported in a microfluidic model. We evaluated the capacity of our microfluidic BBB model to be used for drug permeability studies using large molecules (FITC‐dextrans) and model drugs (caffeine, cimetidine, and doxorubicin). Our analyses demonstrated that the permeability coefficients measured using our model were comparable to in vivo values. Our BBB‐on‐a‐chip model closely mimics physiological BBB barrier functions and will be a valuable tool for screening of drug candidates. The residence time‐based design of a microfluidic platform will enable integration with other organ modules to simulate multi‐organ interactions on drug response. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 184–194. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Qing Yang,et al.  Recreating blood-brain barrier physiology and structure on chip: A novel neurovascular microfluidic bioreactor. , 2015, Biomicrofluidics.

[2]  J. Berwick,et al.  LRP-1-mediated intracellular antibody delivery to the Central Nervous System , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[3]  S. Soper,et al.  Simple room temperature bonding of thermoplastics and poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[4]  D. Janigro,et al.  A Dynamic in vitro BBB Model for the Study of Immune Cell Trafficking into the Central Nervous System , 2011, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  W R Millington,et al.  Blood-brain barrier transport of caffeine: dose-related restriction of adenine transport. , 1982, Life sciences.

[6]  Mandy B. Esch,et al.  TEER Measurement Techniques for In Vitro Barrier Model Systems , 2015, Journal of laboratory automation.

[7]  Kristin M. Fabre,et al.  The National Institutes of Health Microphysiological Systems Program focuses on a critical challenge in the drug discovery pipeline , 2013, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[8]  C. V. Van Itallie,et al.  ZO-1 stabilizes the tight junction solute barrier through coupling to the perijunctional cytoskeleton. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[9]  Mandy B. Esch,et al.  Microfabricated mammalian organ systems and their integration into models of whole animals and humans. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[10]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  A retinoic acid-enhanced, multicellular human blood-brain barrier model derived from stem cell sources , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Alex Avdeef,et al.  Absorption and Drug Development: Solubility, Permeability, and Charge State , 2003 .

[12]  T. Schwerdtle,et al.  The Influence of Silver Nanoparticles on the Blood-Brain and the Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier in vitro , 2014 .

[13]  Maria Antfolk,et al.  In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Models-An Overview of Established Models and New Microfluidic Approaches. , 2015, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  J. Cuevas,et al.  A modular approach to create a neurovascular unit-on-a-chip. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[15]  Chulhee Choi,et al.  Reliable permeability assay system in a microfluidic device mimicking cerebral vasculatures , 2012, Biomedical Microdevices.

[16]  Mandy B. Esch,et al.  The role of body-on-a-chip devices in drug and toxicity studies. , 2011, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[17]  Michael L Shuler,et al.  Pumpless microfluidic platform for drug testing on human skin equivalents. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[18]  Shulan Tian,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells , 2007, Science.

[19]  Pál Ormos,et al.  A versatile lab-on-a-chip tool for modeling biological barriers , 2016 .

[20]  Maria I. Zavodszky,et al.  BioDMET: a physiologically based pharmacokinetic simulation tool for assessing proposed solutions to complex biological problems , 2011, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[21]  R. Bordet,et al.  Stroke-Induced Brain Parenchymal Injury Drives Blood–Brain Barrier Early Leakage Kinetics: A Combined in Vivo/in Vitro Study , 2014, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[22]  J. Joseph,et al.  Doxorubicin-induced Apoptosis in Endothelial Cells and Cardiomyocytes Is Ameliorated by Nitrone Spin Traps and Ebselen , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  A. Berg,et al.  BBB ON CHIP: microfluidic platform to mechanically and biochemically modulate blood-brain barrier function , 2013, Biomedical microdevices.

[24]  J. Kang,et al.  Collagen-based brain microvasculature model in vitro using three-dimensional printed template. , 2015, Biomicrofluidics.

[25]  Andrew D. Wong,et al.  Human brain microvascular endothelial cells resist elongation due to shear stress. , 2015, Microvascular research.

[26]  Kyle J Hewitt,et al.  The claudin gene family: expression in normal and neoplastic tissues , 2006, BMC Cancer.

[27]  Gerald Donnert,et al.  Regulation of endothelial barrier function during flow-induced conversion to an arterial phenotype. , 2007, Cardiovascular research.

[28]  D. Ingber,et al.  Microfluidic organs-on-chips , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  Ken Arai,et al.  Three-Dimensional Blood-Brain Barrier Model for in vitro Studies of Neurovascular Pathology , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[30]  N. Rothwell,et al.  An immortalised astrocyte cell line maintains the in vivo phenotype of a primary porcine in vitro blood–brain barrier model , 2012, Brain Research.

[31]  Michael L Shuler,et al.  Human-on-a-chip design strategies and principles for physiologically based pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics modeling. , 2015, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[32]  S. Chien,et al.  Regulation of Endothelial Cell Cycle by Laminar Versus Oscillatory Flow: Distinct Modes of Interactions of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase and Akt Pathways , 2007, Circulation research.

[33]  Michael Unser,et al.  Effect of Aging on Elastin Functionality in Human Cerebral Arteries , 2008, Stroke.

[34]  R. Booth,et al.  Permeability Analysis of Neuroactive Drugs Through a Dynamic Microfluidic In Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  B. Fu,et al.  Non-invasive measurement of solute permeability in cerebral microvessels of the rat. , 2009, Microvascular research.

[36]  R M Nerem,et al.  Oscillatory shear stress stimulates adhesion molecule expression in cultured human endothelium. , 1998, Circulation research.

[37]  Andreas Hierlemann,et al.  Reconfigurable microfluidic hanging drop network for multi-tissue interaction and analysis , 2014, Nature Communications.

[38]  E. Shusta,et al.  Blood–Brain Barrier Transport of Therapeutics via Receptor-Mediation , 2007, Pharmaceutical Research.

[39]  M. Balda,et al.  Functional analysis of tight junctions. , 2003, Methods.

[40]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Blood‐brain barrier‐specific properties of a human adult brain endothelial cell line , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[41]  Anuj Chauhan,et al.  Extended delivery of ophthalmic drugs by silicone hydrogel contact lenses. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[42]  R. Nerem,et al.  Oscillatory and steady laminar shear stress differentially affect human endothelial redox state: role of a superoxide-producing NADH oxidase. , 1998, Circulation research.

[43]  Kapil Pant,et al.  SyM-BBB: a microfluidic Blood Brain Barrier model. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[44]  Lingyan Shi,et al.  Quantification of blood-brain barrier solute permeability and brain transport by multiphoton microscopy. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[45]  Jong Hwan Sung,et al.  A microfluidic device for a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model on a chip. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[46]  Michael L Shuler,et al.  Multi-cellular 3D human primary liver cell culture elevates metabolic activity under fluidic flow. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[47]  S. Chien Mechanotransduction and endothelial cell homeostasis: the wisdom of the cell. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[48]  W. Pardridge The blood-brain barrier: Bottleneck in brain drug development , 2005, NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics.

[49]  V. Teichberg,et al.  Claudin-5 expression in in vitro models of the blood-brain barrier. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[50]  James M. Anderson,et al.  The Tight Junction Protein ZO-1 Establishes a Link between the Transmembrane Protein Occludin and the Actin Cytoskeleton* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  Peter C. Searson,et al.  The blood-brain barrier: an engineering perspective , 2013, Front. Neuroeng..

[52]  Peter C. Searson,et al.  Brain microvascular endothelial cells resist elongation due to curvature and shear stress , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[53]  Hanseup Kim,et al.  Characterization of a microfluidic in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier (μBBB). , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[54]  R. Lal,et al.  Abl Tyrosine Kinase Phosphorylates Nonmuscle Myosin Light Chain Kinase to Regulate Endothelial Barrier Function , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[55]  F. Sonntag,et al.  A four-organ-chip for interconnected long-term co-culture of human intestine, liver, skin and kidney equivalents. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[56]  Edward J. Rapp,et al.  Side by side comparison between dynamic versus static models of blood–brain barrier in vitro: A permeability study , 2006, Brain Research.

[57]  S. Strickland,et al.  Astrocytic laminin regulates pericyte differentiation and maintains blood brain barrier integrity , 2014, Nature Communications.

[58]  H. Yamawaki,et al.  Chronic vascular toxicity of doxorubicin in an organ‐cultured artery , 2001, British journal of pharmacology.

[59]  P. Davies,et al.  Haemodynamic shear stress activates a K+ current in vascular endothelial cells , 1988, Nature.

[60]  W. Luk,et al.  Boosting Brain Uptake of a Therapeutic Antibody by Reducing Its Affinity for a Transcytosis Target , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[61]  D. Beebe,et al.  Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[62]  T. Yamashima,et al.  In vivo and in vitro evidence for ATP-dependency of P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux of doxorubicin at the blood-brain barrier. , 1995, Biochemical pharmacology.

[63]  R. Shawahna,et al.  Hurdles with using in vitro models to predict human blood-brain barrier drug permeability: a special focus on transporters and metabolizing enzymes. , 2012, Current drug metabolism.

[64]  N. Abbott,et al.  Astrocyte–endothelial interactions and blood–brain barrier permeability * , 2002 .

[65]  Brendon M. Baker,et al.  Endothelial Cell Sensing of Flow Direction , 2013, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[66]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Fluctuations and stimulus-induced changes in blood flow observed in individual capillaries in layers 2 through 4 of rat neocortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  K. Sipos,et al.  Differential Effect of Shear Stress on Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase and N-terminal Jun Kinase in Endothelial Cells , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[68]  H. Koepsell,et al.  Polyspecific Organic Cation Transporters: Structure, Function, Physiological Roles, and Biopharmaceutical Implications , 2007, Pharmaceutical Research.

[69]  H. Galla,et al.  Transport of Arylsulfatase A across the Blood-Brain Barrier in Vitro* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.