Improving Safety of Human-Robot Interaction Through Energy Regulation Control and Passive Compliant Design

Modern production processes continuously require enhancement in production time and the quality of the products. The use of robots in this field of application has formed an increasingly important aspect of the drive for efficiency. These robots typically work in restricted areas to prevent any harmful interaction with humans and are designed for repeatability, speed and precision. However, new opportunities are arising in homes and offices that mean that robots will not be confined to these relatively restricted factory environments and this sets new demands in terms of safety and ability to interact with the environment. These new requirements make industrial heavy and stiff manipulators controlled with high gain PID controllers not suited to cooperate and work closely with humans. In order to cope with this, impedance control (Hogan, 1985; Ikeura and Inooka, 1995; Zollo, Siciliano et al., 2002; Zollo, Siciliano et al., 2003) for decreasing the replicated output impedance of the system to safe values and safety-oriented control strategies (Heinzmann and Zelinsky, 1999; Bicchi and Tonietti, 2004; Kulic and Croft, 2004) to react safely when a Human-Robot Interaction is detected have been introduced. The mentioned control algorithms work well for slow interaction transients and within specific frequency bands, however when the frequencies are above the closed loop bandwidth of the robot, these strategies are ineffective in reacting safely making the resulting system to be dangerous. When a sudden and fast impact occurs, the output impedance of the robot is dominated by the link and the rotor reflected inertia. This latter term is usually high due to the high reduction ratio of the gear making the overall robot output impedance large and dangerous meaning that the system’s safety is once again compromised. An alternative to this “active” approach is the incorporation of intrinsically safe structures particularly focusing on the actuation systems design. Several actuator prototypes have been developed embedding either passive compliant elements in the structure (Pratt and Williamson, 1995; Sugar, 2002; Yoon, Kang et al., 2003; Hurst, Chestnutt et al., 2004; Zinn, Khatib et al., 2004; Hollander, Sugar et al., 2005; Tonietti, Schiavi et al., 2005; Schiavi, Grioli et al., 2008; Tsagarakis, Laffranchi et al., 2009; Catalano, Grioli et al., 2010; Jafari, Tsagarakis et al., 2010; Tsagarakis, Laffranchi et al., 2010) or, more recently, clutches/damping devices (Lauzier and Gosselin, 2011; Shafer and Kermani, 2011) to decouple the link (i.e. the part usually interacting with the human) from the rotor during interaction with either the environment

[1]  Michael R. Zinn,et al.  A New Actuation Approach for Human Friendly Robot Design , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Lynne E. Bilston,et al.  The mechanical properties of the human cervical spinal cordIn Vitro , 1995, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  日本ロボット学会 IROS '95 : proceedings of the 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems : human robot interaction and cooperative robots, August 5-9, 1995, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA , 1995 .

[4]  J. L. Wood,et al.  Dynamic response of human cranial bone. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  VSA-HD: From the enumeration analysis to the prototypical implementation , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Human head-neck biomechanics under axial tension. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Alexander S. Shafer,et al.  Design and validation of a Magneto-Rheological clutch for practical control applications in human-friendly manipulation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  A. Hockley,et al.  Intracranial volume change in childhood. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Safe planning for human-robot interaction , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[11]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A compact compliant actuator (CompAct™) with variable physical damping , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A compact soft actuator unit for small scale human friendly robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  N. Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control:An Approach to Manipulation,Parts I,II,III , 1985 .

[14]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The role of the robot mass and velocity in physical human-robot interaction - Part I: Non-constrained blunt impacts , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Time-domain passivity control of haptic interfaces , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  An impedance-compliance control for a cable-actuated robot , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A novel actuator with adjustable stiffness (AwAS) , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Henry Dreyfuss,et al.  Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design , 1993 .

[19]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[20]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[21]  Shinya Kajikawa,et al.  Robot Finger Module With Multidirectional Adjustable Joint Stiffness , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[22]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Compliant actuation: enhancing the interaction ability of cognitive robotics systems , 2010 .

[23]  S. Margulies,et al.  Infant skull and suture properties: measurements and implications for mechanisms of pediatric brain injury. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[25]  Samia Nefti-Meziani,et al.  Advances in Cognitive Systems , 2010 .

[26]  Sungchul Kang,et al.  Safe arm with MR-based passive compliant joints and visco-elastic covering for service robot applications , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[27]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  An actuator with physically variable stiffness for highly dynamic legged locomotion , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[28]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A variable physical damping actuator (VPDA) for compliant robotic joints , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[29]  Estimation Of Cranial Volume-an Overview Of Methodologies , 2004 .

[30]  Alexander Zelinsky,et al.  A Safe-Control Paradigm for Human–Robot Interaction , 1999, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[31]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Exploiting natural dynamics for energy minimization using an Actuator with Adjustable Stiffness (AwAS) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[32]  Thomas G. Sugar,et al.  A Robotic “Jack Spring”™ for Ankle Gait Assistance , 2005 .

[33]  A R Tilley,et al.  THE MEASURE OF MAN AND WOMAN , 1993 .

[34]  Hikaru Inooka,et al.  Variable impedance control of a robot for cooperation with a human , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[35]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[36]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Time domain passivity control of haptic interfaces , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[37]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Antagonistic and series elastic actuators: a comparative analysis on the energy consumption , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[38]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Compliance Control for an Anthropomorphic Robot with Elastic Joints: Theory and Experiments , 2005 .

[39]  Andrew Calway,et al.  Efficient visual odometry using a structure-driven temporal map , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[40]  J. Versace A Review of the Severity Index , 1971 .

[41]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Series Clutch Actuators for safe physical human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[42]  Thomas G. Sugar A novel selective compliant actuator , 2002 .