Trade‐off between false positives and false negatives in the linkage analysis of complex traits

This study examines the issue of false positives in genomic scans for detecting complex trait loci using sibpair linkage methods and investigates the trade‐off between the rate of false positives and the rate of false negatives. It highlights the tremendous cost in terms of power brought about by an excessive control of type I error and, at the same time, confirms that a larger number of false positives can occur otherwise in the course of a genomic scan. Finally, it compares the power and rate of false positives obtained in preplanned replicated studies conducted using a liberal significance level to those for single‐step studies that use the same total sample size but stricter levels of significance. For the models considered here, replicate studies were found more attractive as long as one is willing to accept a trade‐off, exchanging a much lower rate of false negatives for a slight increase in the rate of false positives. Genet. Epidemiol. 14:453–464,1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  I. Borecki,et al.  Trade-off between sibship size and sampling scheme for detecting quantitative trait loci. , 1997, Human heredity.

[2]  C. Amos Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  Cécile Fizames,et al.  The 1993–94 Généthon human genetic linkage map , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Blackwelder Wc,et al.  A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci , 1985 .

[5]  J. Witte,et al.  Genetic dissection of complex traits , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Eric Lander Leonid Kruglyak Genetic dissection of complex traits , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[7]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[8]  D C Rao,et al.  Combining extremely concordant sibpairs with extremely discordant sibpairs provides a cost effective way to linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci , 1996, Genetic epidemiology.

[9]  Zhaohai Li,et al.  Random effects model for meta‐analysis of multiple quantitative sibpair linkage studies , 1996, Genetic epidemiology.

[10]  J. Witte,et al.  Genetic dissection of complex traits. , 1994, Nature genetics.

[11]  G. Carey,et al.  Linkage analysis of quantitative traits: increased power by using selected samples. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  G. Thomson Identifying complex disease genes: progress and paradigms , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[13]  R. Doerge,et al.  Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. , 1994, Genetics.

[14]  N. Schork,et al.  Extended multipoint identity-by-descent analysis of human quantitative traits: efficiency, power, and modeling considerations. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  E Feingold,et al.  Gaussian models for genetic linkage analysis using complete high-resolution maps of identity by descent. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  N Risch,et al.  Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans. , 1995, Science.

[17]  D. Goldgar Multipoint analysis of human quantitative genetic variation. , 1990, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  L. Eaves Effect of genetic architecture on the power of human linkage studies to resolve the contribution of quantitative trait loci , 1994, Heredity.

[19]  R. Elston,et al.  The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus , 1972, Behavior genetics.

[20]  A sib-pair approach to interval mapping of quantitative trait loci. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  David Curtis Genetic dissection of complex traits , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[22]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[23]  N. Risch,et al.  A note on multiple testing procedures in linkage analysis. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.