AI Ethics for Systemic Issues: A Structural Approach

The debate on AI ethics largely focuses on technical improvements and stronger regulation to prevent accidents or misuse of AI, with solutions relying on holding individual actors accountable for responsible AI development. While useful and necessary, we argue that this "agency" approach disregards more indirect and complex risks resulting from AI's interaction with the socio-economic and political context. This paper calls for a "structural" approach to assessing AI's effects in order to understand and prevent such systemic risks where no individual can be held accountable for the broader negative impacts. This is particularly relevant for AI applied to systemic issues such as climate change and food security which require political solutions and global cooperation. To properly address the wide range of AI risks and ensure 'AI for social good', agency-focused policies must be complemented by policies informed by a structural approach.

[1]  Thilo Hagendorff,et al.  The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines , 2019, Minds and Machines.

[2]  Anna Jobin,et al.  The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R. Naylor,et al.  Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  B. Mittelstadt.  Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI , 2019 .

[6]  Luke Stark,et al.  Better, Nicer, Clearer, Fairer: A Critical Assessment of the Movement for Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning , 2019, HICSS.

[7]  Marcello Ienca,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: the global landscape of ethics guidelines , 2019, ArXiv.

[8]  Seán S. ÓhÉigeartaigh,et al.  An AI Race for Strategic Advantage: Rhetoric and Risks , 2017, AIES.

[9]  Rahul Ramachandran,et al.  Earth Science Deep Learning: Applications and Lessons Learned , 2018, IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[10]  A. Mittal,et al.  The 2008 Food Price Crisis: Rethinking Food Security Policies , 2009 .

[11]  N. Diffenbaugh,et al.  Global warming has increased global economic inequality , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Thomas Ploug.  Should all medical research be published? The moral responsibility of medical journal editors , 2018, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[13]  Miles Brundage,et al.  The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Development , 2019, ArXiv.

[14]  Karl Pfeiffer,et al.  Improving Subseasonal Forecasting in the Western U.S. with Machine Learning , 2018, KDD.

[15]  Ryan Calo,et al.  There is a blind spot in AI research , 2016, Nature.

[16]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning , 2019, ACM Comput. Surv..

[17]  C. Müller,et al.  Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  A. King,et al.  The Inequality of Climate Change From 1.5 to 2°C of Global Warming , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[19]  Hyrum S. Anderson,et al.  The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation , 2018, ArXiv.