The Optimized Fabrication of Nanobubbles as Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Tumor Imaging
暂无分享,去创建一个
Li Zhang | Jian Zhang | Y. Duan | Wenbin Cai | Li Zhang | L. Yuan | Heng Yang | Jian Zhang | J. Yin | Yi Lin Yang | Wen Bin Cai | Heng Li Yang | Ji Kai Yin | Li Jun Yuan | Yun You Duan
[1] J. Willmann,et al. Molecular ultrasound imaging: current status and future directions. , 2010, Clinical radiology.
[2] Jonathan R Lindner,et al. Molecular imaging with contrast ultrasound and targeted microbubbles , 2004, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[3] S. L. Bridal,et al. The performance of PEGylated nanocapsules of perfluorooctyl bromide as an ultrasound contrast agent. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[4] Robert C. Wolpert,et al. A Review of the , 1985 .
[5] Andrew D. Miller. Lipid-Based Nanoparticles in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy , 2013, Journal of drug delivery.
[6] E. Unger,et al. Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.
[7] T. Hwang,et al. Development and evaluation of perfluorocarbon nanobubbles for apomorphine delivery. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.
[8] Sergio Uzzau,et al. Development of polymeric microbubbles targeted to prostate-specific membrane antigen as prototype of novel ultrasound contrast agents. , 2011, Molecular pharmaceutics.
[9] Zhong-gao Gao,et al. Multifunctional nanoparticles for combining ultrasonic tumor imaging and targeted chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[10] J. Kuszak,et al. Development of inherently echogenic liposomes as an ultrasonic contrast agent. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.
[11] William R Wagner,et al. Ultrasound Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection With Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2003, Circulation.
[12] R. Weissleder. Molecular Imaging in Cancer , 2006, Science.
[13] A. Evangelista,et al. Specific targeting of human inflamed endothelium and in situ vascular tissue transfection by the use of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[14] M. Wan,et al. Optimal design and experimental investigation of surfactant encapsulated microbubbles. , 2006, Ultrasonics.
[15] Hiroyuki Honda,et al. The effect of RGD peptide-conjugated magnetite cationic liposomes on cell growth and cell sheet harvesting. , 2005, Biomaterials.
[16] R K Jain,et al. Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.
[17] Mark Borden,et al. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.
[18] Francesco Stellacci,et al. Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. , 2010, Small.
[19] P. Burns,et al. Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role? , 2010, Radiology.
[20] Inga Cicenaite,et al. Composition of PLGA and PEI/DNA nanoparticles improves ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in solid tumors in vivo. , 2008, Cancer letters.
[21] John C Chappell,et al. Targeted delivery of nanoparticles bearing fibroblast growth factor-2 by ultrasonic microbubble destruction for therapeutic arteriogenesis. , 2008, Small.
[22] G. V. van Dam,et al. Advanced carotid plaque imaging. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.
[23] R K Jain,et al. Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size. , 1995, Cancer research.
[24] H. Maeda,et al. Polymeric drugs for efficient tumor-targeted drug delivery based on EPR-effect. , 2009, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.
[25] Y. Liu,et al. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced US and magnetic microbubbles targeted to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 for molecular imaging of atherosclerosis. , 2011, Radiology.
[26] Luis Solorio,et al. Formulation and characterization of echogenic lipid-Pluronic nanobubbles. , 2009, Molecular pharmaceutics.
[27] Zhanwen Xing,et al. The fabrication of novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent for potential tumor imaging , 2010, Nanotechnology.
[28] Khaled Greish,et al. Enhanced permeability and retention of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors: A royal gate for targeted anticancer nanomedicines , 2007, Journal of drug targeting.
[29] T. Pons,et al. Synthesis, encapsulation, purification and coupling of single quantum dots in phospholipid micelles for their use in cellular and in vivo imaging , 2007, Nature Protocols.
[30] V. Dilsizian,et al. Delayed recovery of fatty acid metabolism after transient myocardial ischemia: A potential imaging target for “ischemic memory” , 2007, Current cardiology reports.
[31] C. Nimsky,et al. Development and characterization of new nanoscaled ultrasound active lipid dispersions as contrast agents. , 2011, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.
[32] P. Couvreur,et al. Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[33] Ping Wang,et al. Nanobubbles for enhanced ultrasound imaging of tumors , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.
[34] S. Kaul,et al. Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography , 2004, Circulation.
[35] Chulhong Kim,et al. Multifunctional microbubbles and nanobubbles for photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.
[36] Mark B. Flegg,et al. Rayleigh theory of ultrasound scattering applied to liquid-filled contrast nanoparticles , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.
[37] Dar-Bin Shieh,et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted cancer imaging and diagnostics. , 2012, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.
[38] H. Maeda. The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. , 2001, Advances in enzyme regulation.
[39] J. G. Miller,et al. High-frequency ultrasonic detection of thrombi with a targeted contrast system. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[40] A. Giaccia,et al. The unique physiology of solid tumors: opportunities (and problems) for cancer therapy. , 1998, Cancer research.
[41] Katherine W Ferrara,et al. Lipid-shelled vehicles: engineering for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.
[42] R. Esenaliev,et al. Enhancement of Drug Delivery in Tumors by Using Interaction of Nanoparticles with Ultrasound Radiation , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.
[43] R. Jain,et al. Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[44] M. Wheatley,et al. Development and characterization of a nano-scale contrast agent. , 2004, Ultrasonics.
[45] F. Marshall,et al. In vivo molecular and cellular imaging with quantum dots. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[46] S. Kaul,et al. Assessment of Endogenous and Therapeutic Arteriogenesis by Contrast Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Integrin Expression , 2005, Circulation.
[47] C. Hung,et al. Acoustically active perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions as drug delivery carriers for camptothecin: drug release and cytotoxicity against cancer cells. , 2009, Ultrasonics.
[48] F Forsberg,et al. Ultrasound contrast agents: a review. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[49] Flemming Forsberg,et al. Surfactant-stabilized contrast agent on the nanoscale for diagnostic ultrasound imaging. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[50] Samuel A Wickline,et al. Sonic activation of molecularly-targeted nanoparticles accelerates transmembrane lipid delivery to cancer cells through contact-mediated mechanisms: implications for enhanced local drug delivery. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[51] N. Rapoport,et al. Application of ultrasound for targeted nanotherapy of malignant tumors , 2009, Acoustical physics.