Explaining Usage Patterns in Open Government Data: The Case of Data.Gov.UK

Open data is one of the most significant current trends in public administration, with over 100 current open government projects around the world investing considerable time and effort in opening up public sector information for free re-use. The movement, whilst attracting widespread support, has also proved highly controversial, with critics highlighting both the high financial burden it appears to place on government departments and its uncertain political consequences; with some going so far to claim that the rhetoric of government transparency and open innovation has been co-opted into the service of neoliberal deregulation.Despite the significance of the movement and the importance of the critiques, "little systematic OD research has been performed to date" (Peled 2013, 187), with both supportive and critical authors largely relying on anecdotes and one-off case studies. The major reason for this lies in the openness of open data itself: with no requirement to create an account before accessing data, there are no records of who is using it or for what purpose. Hence it is hard to systematically answer many of the major questions being raised about open data.The aim of this article is to take a step towards remedying this deficit. Based on a unique dataset created through data downloaded and scraped from the UK’s open data portal website, we develop and test analytical models which seek to explain the amount of times individual datasets have been downloaded. We explore factors relating to both the economic sustainability of open data (asking whether extra departmental effort in curating datasets results in extra download levels) and its political implications (asking whether datasets relating to financial transparency or datasets with profit making potential are downloaded more). Our results challenge some of the key critiques currently live in the open data debate, and also suggest a way forward for the area in terms of financial sustainability and its contribution to democratic accountability.

[1]  Jo Bates,et al.  "This is what modern deregulation looks like" : co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK's Open Government Data Initiative , 2012, J. Community Informatics.

[2]  Jo Bates,et al.  The Domestication of Open Government Data Advocacy in the United Kingdom: A Neo-Gramscian Analysis , 2013 .

[3]  A. Clarke,et al.  Governments and Citizens Getting to Know Each Other? Open, Closed, and Big Data in Public Management Reform , 2014 .

[4]  Michael Gurstein,et al.  Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? , 2011, First Monday.

[5]  A. Thurston.  Trustworthy Records and Open Data , 2012, J. Community Informatics.

[6]  Alon Peled,et al.  When transparency and collaboration collide: The USA Open Data program , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Ben Worthy,et al.  More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government , 2010 .

[8]  A. Kelso.  Parliament on its Knees: MPs' Expenses and the Crisis of Transparency at Westminster , 2009 .

[9]  E. Felten,et al.  Government Data and the Invisible Hand , 2009 .

[10]  Alon Peled,et al.  Re-Designing Open Data 2.0 , 2013 .

[11]  Matthew B. Jones,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology , 2011, Science.

[12]  Harlan Yu,et al.  The New Ambiguity of 'Open Government' , 2012 .

[13]  Justin Esarey,et al.  Assessing Fit Quality and Testing for Misspecification in Binary-Dependent Variable Models , 2012, Political Analysis.

[14]  Amanda Meng.  Investigating the Roots of Open Data’s Social Impact , 2014 .

[15]  Justin Longo.  #Opendata: Digital-Era Governance Thoroughbred or New Public Management Trojan Horse? , 2011 .

[16]  Alon Peled,et al.  Towards Open Data for Public Accountability: Examining the US and the UK Models , 2015 .

[17]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  T. Vision.  Open Data and the Social Contract of Scientific Publishing , 2010 .

[19]  R. Pollock.  THE ECONOMICS OF PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION , 2010 .

[20]  Lionel Bently,et al.  Models of Public Sector Information Provision via Trading Funds , 2008 .

[21]  B. Noveck.  Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful , 2009 .

[22]  Tim G. Davies,et al.  The Promises and Perils of Open Government Data (OGD) , 2012, J. Community Informatics.