MACULAR THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS IN NORMAL EYES WITH TIME-DOMAIN AND FOURIER-DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY

Purpose: To compare macular thickness measurements using time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Fourier-domain OCT. Methods: Thirty-two eyes from 32 normal patients underwent complete ophthalmic evaluation. Macular scanning using the StratusOCT and the RTVue-100 OCT were performed for a total of three times each on the same visit. The average retinal thicknesses of the nine macular sectors as defined by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, along with the foveal center point and macular volume, were recorded. The SD, the coefficient of variation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated for each parameter studied. Comparisons were made between the two OCTs in terms of retinal thicknesses measurements, their reproducibility, and macular regional differences. Correlations between retinal thickness and demographic variables (age and gender) were also investigated. Due to known differences in segmentation algorithms of the two OCTs, software calipers were used to measure the distance from the internal limiting membrane to the photoreceptor inner segment–outer segment junction at the foveal center point on all RTVue scans to allow a more fair comparison. Results: The RTVue yielded greater retinal thickness measurements in nearly all macular subfields compared with the StratusOCT. Even after accounting for differences in segmentation algorithms, significant disparities were still evident with the RTVue measurements less than those of the StratusOCT at the foveal center. On both machines, the macula was thinnest at the fovea and thickest within the 3 mm ring. There were some consistent regional variations in macular thickness evident on both OCTs. Compared with the StratusOCT, the RTVue generally had lower coefficients of variation and higher intraclass coefficients, suggesting better reproducibility. Age and gender also appeared to be important determinants in some macular thickness parameters. Conclusion: Compared with StratusOCT, the RTVue fourier-domain OCT yields greater retinal thickness measurements with greater reproducibility, presumably due to different segmentation algorithms, increased sampling density, and greater resolution. However, regional differences across the macula can be consistently observed with both devices.

[1]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[2]  Su-Qin Yu,et al.  Quantitative in vivo retinal thickness measurement in chinese healthy subjects with retinal thickness analyzer. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Harald Sattmann,et al.  Histologic correlation of pig retina radial stratification with ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  R. Guymer,et al.  Heritability of macular thickness determined by optical coherence tomography. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  A Erginay,et al.  Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Enhanced visualization of macular pathology with the use of ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  J. Duker,et al.  Normal macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using Stratus optical coherence tomography. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  Jeffrey M. Liebmann,et al.  Macular and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurement Reproducibility Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT-3) , 2003, Journal of glaucoma.

[9]  G. Ripandelli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[10]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Comparison of ultrahigh- and standard-resolution optical coherence tomography for imaging macular pathology. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[11]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  J. Fujimoto Optical coherence tomography for ultrahigh resolution in vivo imaging , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs--an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[14]  Ziqiang Wu,et al.  Error correction and quantitative subanalysis of optical coherence tomography data using computer-assisted grading. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  T. Lim,et al.  Use of optical coherence tomography to assess variations in macular retinal thickness in myopia. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using StratusOCT. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  Anthony J Correnti,et al.  Optical coherence tomography measurement of macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous human eyes. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[18]  J. Duker,et al.  Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[19]  Jingjing Huang,et al.  Optical coherence tomography's diagnostic value in evaluating surgical impact on idiopathic macular hole. , 2003, Chinese medical journal.

[20]  P. Massin,et al.  Comparison of optical coherence tomography models OCT1 and Stratus OCT for macular retinal thickness measurement , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  J. Duker,et al.  Three-dimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[23]  E Reichel,et al.  Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  A Erginay,et al.  Retinal Thickness in Healthy and Diabetic Subjects Measured Using Optical Coherence Tomography Mapping Software , 2002, European journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  A. Cavallerano,et al.  Racial Differences in Macular Thickness in Healthy Eyes , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  E A Swanson,et al.  Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[27]  C. W. Chan,et al.  Relationship of Gender, Body Mass Index, and Axial Length with Central Retinal Thickness Using Optical Coherence Tomography , 2005, Eye.

[28]  P. Sony,et al.  Macular thickness evaluation using the optical coherence tomography in normal Indian eyes. , 2004, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  Maciej Wojtkowski,et al.  High-definition and 3-dimensional imaging of macular pathologies with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[30]  Angelika Unterhuber,et al.  Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography of the monkey fovea. Identification of retinal sublayers by correlation with semithin histology sections. , 2004, Experimental eye research.

[31]  Paul Mitchell,et al.  Distribution of macular thickness by optical coherence tomography: findings from a population-based study of 6-year-old children. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  Miguel J Maldonado,et al.  Retinal thickness study with optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetes. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  Barry Cense,et al.  Histologic correlation of in vivo optical coherence tomography images of the human retina. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.