Mapping Gravitational and Magnetic Fields with Children 9–11: Relevance, difficulties and prospects

This paper presents an investigation centered on a guided conceptual path concerning magnetic and gravitational fields, proposed for children aged 9–11. The goal is to appreciate to what extent the idea of “mapping” two fields of interaction is accessible and fruitful for children of that age. The conceptual target is to link magnetic and gravitational sources with their respective field lines, and then use this linkage to differentiate between the two kinds of interactions. This study shows that the proposed “mapping” and the differences between the maps are accessible to a large proportion of pupils. By contrast, only a minority can differentiate between the two types of interactions: the idea of mere attraction remains dominant and may screen the idea of orientation. Finally, we discuss to what extent these exploratory results confirm the relevancy of such teaching goals and how they inform the design of research‐based teaching sequences concerning this topic.

[1]  José Rodrigo DISEÑO Y EVALUACIÓN DE UNA PROPUESTA PARA LA ENSEÑANZA DEL CONCEPTO DE CAMPO EN FÍSICA , 2001 .

[2]  Jenaro Guisasola Aranzábal,et al.  Concepciones alternativas y dificultades de aprendizaje en electrostática : selección de cuestiones elaboradas para su detección y tratamiento , 1999 .

[3]  Kerstin Pettersson,et al.  Confusion by representation: On student’s comprehension of the electric field concept , 1993 .

[4]  C. Sneider,et al.  Children's concepts about weight and free fall , 1994 .

[5]  V. Bar,et al.  Children's ideas about action at a distance , 1997 .

[6]  Ugo Besson Some features of causal reasoning: common sense and physics teaching , 2004 .

[7]  Children' Ideas about Gravitation, Investigating a Model of Gravitational Field , 2004 .

[8]  L. Viennot,et al.  Design and evaluation of a research-based teaching sequence: the superposition of electric field , 1999 .

[9]  David Palmer,et al.  Students' alternative conceptions and scientifically acceptable conceptions about gravity , 2001 .

[10]  I. Galili Weight versus gravitational force: Historical and educational perspectives , 2001 .

[11]  J. Novak,et al.  An assessment of children's concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews , 1976 .

[12]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models of magnetism , 1998 .

[13]  L. Worrall,et al.  Children's knowledge of the earth's shape and its gravitational field , 1995 .

[14]  Laurence Viennot,et al.  Students' Reasoning about the Superposition of Electric Fields , 1992 .

[15]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  A. Cartelli,et al.  Weight, gravity and air pressure: Mental representations by Italian middle school pupils , 1985 .

[17]  Ileana María Greca,et al.  The kinds of mental representations‐‐models, propositions and images‐‐used by college physics students regarding the concept of field , 1997 .

[18]  David P Maloney,et al.  Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .

[19]  J. García,et al.  Concepciones alternativas sobre el campo magnético estacionario. Selección de cuestiones realizadas para su detección , 2003 .