Corporate references to “sustainability” and the operative process of “green business” have become almost commonplace over the past decade. Companies not only seek to comply with environmental regulations, but many have discovered that techniques for reducing adverse environmental impact often have positive effects on corporate profitability as well. Such adoptions of green business and engineering practices are morally neutral because the driving forces behind them are legal and economic, but not ethical. In some instances, however, managers and engineers have undertaken green business initiatives with the notion of doing something positive for future humans and for the natural environment. In this paper we discuss the “green” driving forces behind moral decisions regarding the adoption of green engineering and business practices and conclude that most “green engineering” known to the public is simply good business practice. Only when engineering and business begin the “green engineering” program with the aim of reducing adverse impact on health or environment does “green engineering” become morally admirable.
[1]
L H Lovins,et al.
A road map for natural capitalism.
,
1999,
Harvard business review.
[2]
Milton Friedman,et al.
Capitalism and Freedom
,
1963
.
[3]
J. Piaget.
The Moral Judgment of the Child
,
1932
.
[4]
Samir B. Billatos,et al.
Green technology and design for the environment
,
1997
.
[5]
Ronald F. Duska,et al.
Moral Development: A Guide to Piaget and Kohlberg
,
1975
.
[6]
James R. Rest.
Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory
,
1986
.
[7]
Richard N. L. Andrews,et al.
Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy, Second Edition
,
1999
.
[8]
Paul Hawken,et al.
The Ecology of Commerce: A Declaration of Sustainability
,
2010
.
[9]
Anne Colby,et al.
A Longitudinal Study of Moral Judgment.
,
1983
.
[10]
S. P. Sethi,et al.
Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework
,
1975
.