Innovation, sustainability and democracy: an analysis of grassroots contributions

In this paper we introduce an area of activity that has flourished for decades in all corners of the globe, namely grassroots innovation for sustainable development. We also argue why innovation in general is a matter for democracy. Combining these two points, we explore how grassroots innovation can contribute to what we call innovation democracy, and help guide innovation so that it supports rather than hinders social justice and environmental resilience. Drawing upon qual- itative case studies from empirical domains including energy, food, and manufacture, we suggest it does so in four related ways: 1. Processes of grassroots innovation can help in their own right to cultivate the more democratic practice of innovation more generally. 2. Grassroots innovations that result from these processes can support citi- zens and activities in ways that can contribute to practice of democracy. 3. Grassroots innovations can create particular empowering sociotechnical configurations that might otherwise be suppressed by interests around more mainstream innovation systems. 4. Grassroots innovations can help nurture general levels of social diversity that are important for the health of democracy in its widest political senses. The paper finishes with a few suggestions for how societies committed to innovation democracy can better support and benefit from grassroots activity, by working at changes in culture, infrastructure, training, investment, and openness.

[1]  The Way Forward (The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow) , 2019 .

[2]  Saurabh Tewari.  How to Thrive in the Next Economy: Designing Tomorrow’s World Today , 2018 .

[3]  David H. Guston,et al.  Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building , 2017, Public understanding of science.

[4]  Adrian Smith.  Social Innovation, Democracy and Makerspaces , 2017 .

[5]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Peer production, the commons, and the future of the firm , 2017 .

[6]  Marianne de Laet,et al.  The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology , 2017 .

[7]  N. Simcock.  Procedural justice and the implementation of community wind energy projects: A case study from South Yorkshire, UK , 2016 .

[8]  Alternative technology niches and sustainable development: 12 years on , 2016 .

[9]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Grassroots Innovation Movements , 2016 .

[10]  Adrian Smith,et al.  How To Cultivate Sustainable Developments In Makerspaces , 2016 .

[11]  Mike Cooley,et al.  Architect or Bee?: The Human Price of Technology , 2016 .

[12]  Chris Featherman,et al.  DIY citizenship: Critical making and social media , 2016, New Media Soc..

[13]  Sabine Hielscher,et al.  Making the most of community energies: Three perspectives on grassroots innovation , 2016 .

[14]  A. Stirling.  Knowing doing governing: realizing heterodyne democracies , 2016 .

[15]  Cindy Kohtala,et al.  Making Sustainability. How Fab Labs Address Environmental Issues , 2016 .

[16]  Adrian A. Smith.  Tooling Up: civic visions, FabLabs, and grassroots activism , 2015 .

[17]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Twenty challenges to innovation studies , 2015 .

[18]  Tim Jordan,et al.  Information Politics: Liberation and Exploitation in the Digital Society , 2015 .

[19]  A. Stirling.  Emancipating transformation: from controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical progress , 2015 .

[20]  Ian Scoones,et al.  The politics of green transformations , 2015 .

[21]  S. Hall,et al.  Community energy and equity: The distributional implications of a transition to a decentralised electricity system , 2014 .

[22]  Sabine Hielscher,et al.  A grassroots sustainable energy niche?:Reflections on community energy in the UK , 2014 .

[23]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Towards Innovation Democracy? Participation, Responsibility and Precaution in Innovation Governance. , 2014 .

[24]  Adrian Smith.  Technology networks for socially useful production , 2014 .

[25]  Adrian Smith,et al.  When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation , 2014 .

[26]  F. Geels.  Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[27]  Community-Based Digital Fabrication Workshops: A Review of the Research Literature. , 2014 .

[28]  A. Stirling.  Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices , 2014 .

[29]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Grassroots innovation movements: challenges and contributions , 2014 .

[30]  H. Kumar,et al.  Jugaad to grassroot innovations: understanding the landscape of the informal sector innovations in India , 2014 .

[31]  Vasilis Kostakis,et al.  Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy , 2014 .

[32]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation Politics Post-Rio+20: Hybrid Pathways to Sustainability? , 2013 .

[33]  Adrian Smith,et al.  A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK , 2013 .

[34]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development , 2013 .

[35]  Mark R. Johnson.  Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics , 2013 .

[36]  Dustin Mulvaney,et al.  The political economy of the ‘just transition’ , 2013 .

[37]  Julian Agyeman,et al.  Introducing Just Sustainabilities: Policy, Planning, and Practice , 2013 .

[38]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Understanding Transition—Periphery Dynamics: Renewable Energy in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland , 2013 .

[39]  Andrzej K. Koźmiński,et al.  The Entrepreneurial State , 2013 .

[40]  Ângela Guimarães Pereira,et al.  Citizen engagement and urban change: Three case studies of material deliberation , 2012 .

[41]  J. Rockström,et al.  Transforming Innovation for Sustainability , 2012 .

[42]  Saradindu Bhaduri,et al.  Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: tracing the motivation of ‘grassroot’ innovators in India , 2011 .

[43]  P. V. Zwanenberg,et al.  Regulating Technology: International Harmonization and Local Realities , 2011 .

[44]  Maria Clara Couto Soares,et al.  Social technology network: paths for sustainability , 2011 .

[45]  Kai A. Olsen,et al.  Democracy and Technology , 2011, Computer.

[46]  Bradley D. Parrish,et al.  Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives , 2010 .

[47]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[48]  M. Bell.  The Exploitation of Indigenous Knowledge or the Indigenous Exploitation of Knowledge: Whose Use of What for What? , 2009 .

[49]  John Byrne,et al.  Relocating Energy in the Social Commons , 2009 .

[50]  Nils Markusson.  Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation and the , 2009 .

[51]  Michel Callon,et al.  Acting in an uncertain world , 2009 .

[52]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[53]  S. Hilgartner.  Intellectual Property and the Politics of Emerging Technology: Inventors, Citizens, and Powers to Shape the Future , 2008 .

[54]  A. Stirling.  “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[55]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake , 2007 .

[56]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda , 2007 .

[57]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[58]  Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen,et al.  From human-centred to human-context centred approach: looking back over ‘the hills’, what has been gained and lost? , 2007, AI & SOCIETY.

[59]  Adrian Smith.  Green Niches in Sustainable Development: The Case of Organic Food in the United Kingdom , 2006 .

[60]  Tyler J. Veak.  Democratizing Technology: Andrew Feenberg's Critical Theory of Technology , 2006 .

[61]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[62]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[63]  A. Hommels,et al.  Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies , 2005 .

[64]  Noortje Marres,et al.  No issue, no public: democratic deficits after the displacement of politics , 2005 .

[65]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Alternative technology niches and sustainable development , 2004 .

[66]  Tom Wakeford,et al.  Democratising technology: reclaiming science for sustainable development , 2004 .

[67]  Riya Sinha,et al.  Mobilizing grassroots' technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: articulating social and ethical capital , 2003 .

[68]  A. Jamison.  The making of green knowledge: the contribution from activism , 2003 .

[69]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  User-led Innovation Processes: The Development of Professional Car Sharing by Environmentally Concerned Citizens , 2003 .

[70]  A. Honneth,et al.  Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange , 2003 .

[71]  A. Jamison.  The Making of Green Knowledge , 2001 .

[72]  M. Turshen.  Development as Freedom , 2001 .

[73]  C. Tilly.  Democracy , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[74]  P. Asaro.  Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design , 2000 .

[75]  Simon Joss,et al.  Public participation in science and technology policy- and decision-making — ephemeral phenomenon or lasting change? , 1999 .

[76]  I. Shapiro,et al.  Democracy's Edges , 1999 .

[77]  Michael Jacobs,et al.  Sustainable development as a contested concept , 1999 .

[78]  L. Levidow.  Democratizing technology—or technologizing democracy? Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe , 1998 .

[79]  J. Bohman,et al.  Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics , 1997 .

[80]  Philip Kraft,et al.  The Collective Resource Approach: the Scandinavian Experience , 1994, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[82]  L. Winner.  Democracy in a technological society , 1992 .

[83]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Technology, progress and the quality of life , 1991 .

[84]  O. Fals-Borda,et al.  Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly With Participatory Action Research , 1991 .

[85]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[86]  J. Last.  Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[87]  Pam Linn.  Socially useful production , 1987 .

[88]  Arie Rip,et al.  Controversies as Informal Technology A ssessment , 1986 .

[89]  S. Agate,et al.  Small is beautiful , 2003, English Today.

[90]  D. Elliott,et al.  The Lucas plan : a new trade unionism in the making? , 1982 .

[91]  V. Ferkiss.  Autonomous Technology. Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought . By Winner Langdon. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1977. Pp. x + 386. $17.95.) , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[92]  Innovation Policies for Inclusive Development SCALING UP INCLUSIVE INNOVATIONS , 2022 .