Validation of the spin-T goniometer, a cervical range of motion device.

OBJECTIVE To test the validity of the Spin-T goniometer for the assessment of cervical range of movement. METHODS A linear regression analysis for paired neck movements using first a foam head model and then human subjects was performed to quantify the differences between the measurements obtained from the MotionStar, a movement-tracking device, and the Spin-T. A within-subject repeated measures design using simultaneous data acquisition was completed. RESULTS The coefficient of determination (R2) for all planes of cervical range of motion for both model and human data sets was higher than 0.99. The regression equations for the model data showed no significant (P > .05) intercept for flexion-extension and lateral rotation. Human data showed statistically significant intercept for flexion-extension (mean, -0.52 degrees) and lateral flexion (mean, 0.81 degrees) at P < .05. CONCLUSION This study quantifies the difference between the MotionStar and the Spin-T goniometer and documents the systematic error between the measures. Where the error reached statistical significance, the magnitude of the error was very small (< 1.5 degrees). The results of this study suggest that the Spin-T goniometer may be used as a valid measuring instrument for cervical range of movement.

[1]  A. Pedotti,et al.  A 3D kinematic method for evaluating voluntary movements of the cervical spine in humans. , 1998, Functional neurology.

[2]  T. R. Garrett,et al.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[3]  Michael John Haynes,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of a new, protractor-based neck goniometer. , 2002, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[4]  P. Jones,et al.  The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[5]  A. König,et al.  Nichtinvasive, akkurate und reliable Messung der Halswirbelsäulenbeweglichkeit mittels ultraschallgestützter 3D-Echtzeit-Bewegungsanalyse , 1999 .

[6]  N Nilsson,et al.  Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design. , 1998, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[7]  M. Tousignant,et al.  Criterion Validity of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer for Cervical Flexion and Extension , 2000, Spine.

[8]  R D Johnson,et al.  Reliability of cervical range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 spine motion analyser on asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. , 2000, Manual therapy.

[9]  Z Dvir,et al.  Reproducibility and instrument validity of a new ultrasonography-based system for measuring cervical spine kinematics. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  J. Mehlsen,et al.  A comparison of physical characteristics between patients seeking treatment for neck pain and age-matched healthy people. , 1997, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[11]  Quynh-Uyen T. Bui,et al.  A comparison of methods of evaluating cervical range of motion. , 2002, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[12]  J. Cassidy,et al.  The effect of manipulation on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a pilot study. , 1992, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[13]  T. R. Garrett,et al.  Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion--comparison of three methods. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[14]  J Rotés Querol,et al.  [The cervical spine]. , 1992, Medicina clinica.

[15]  H W Christensen.  Precision and accuracy of an electrogoniometer. , 1999, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[16]  J. Bolton,et al.  Reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for measuring cervical range of motion: effects of age and gender. , 1995, Manual therapy.

[17]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine , 1978 .