Stimulation and suppression of cell-mediated immunity by endosporulation antigens of Coccidioides immitis

The culture filtrate of Coccidioides immitis induced to replicate in its parasitic phase in vitro, termed endosporulation antigens (EA), was assayed for ability to stimulate human lymphocyte blastogenesis in vitro. Stimulation of lymphocytes from skin test-positive healthy subjects by EA was comparable to stimulation by spherulin at optimal dilutions, but EA are 500 times more potent when compared on the basis of weight. Both preparations slightly stimulated lymphocytes from skin test-negative subjects. Heating or dialysis of EA enhanced the effect on skin test-positive subjects, but concentration depressed it. Concentrated EA also depressed nonspecific stimulation caused by phytohemagglutinin. Dialysis of concentrated EA reduced the ability to depress responses. EA from an avirulent strain of C. immitis were as stimulatory as EA from a virulent strain, but concentrating the former did not produce as much depression as concentrating the latter did. A survey of subjects with an optimal dose of EA in lymphocyte transformation showed that EA could separate skin test-positive from -negative subjects as well as spherulin could. The survey also showed that a delta cpm (the difference of incorporated counts of tritiated thymidine per minute in the presence or absence of the reagent) of 10,000 is useful for this separation. These results also indicate the presence of suppressive substances in EA which are only partially dialyzable and which were significantly more prominent in a preparation from the virulent strain.

[1]  R. Cox Cross-Reactivity Between Antigens of Coccidioides immitis, Histoplasma capsulatum, and Blastomyces dermatitidis in Lymphocyte Transformation Assays , 1979, Infection and immunity.

[2]  D. Stevens,et al.  Cellular immunity in infectious mononucleosis. II. Specific reactivity to Epstein-Barr Virus antigens and correlation with clinical and hematologic parameters. , 1978, Journal of immunology.

[3]  S. Sun,et al.  Antigenic analysis of coccidioidin and spherulin determined by two-dimensional immunoelectrophoresis , 1978, Infection and immunity.

[4]  M. Huppert Antigenic Analysis ofCoccidioidin andSpherulin Determined byTwo-Dimensional Immunoelectrophoresis , 1978 .

[5]  D. Stevens,et al.  Cellular immunity to Coccidioides immitis: In vitro lymphocyte response to spherules, arthrospores, and endospores , 1977 .

[6]  E. Brummer,et al.  In vitro lymphocyte responses of coccidioidin skin test-positive and -negative persons to coccidioidin, spherulin, and a coccidioides cell wall antigen , 1977, Infection and immunity.

[7]  L. Ajello Coccidioidomycosis. Current clinical and diagnostic status. , 1977 .

[8]  J. Graybill,et al.  Variability of sequential studies of lymphocyte blastogenesis in normal adults. , 1976, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[9]  D. Stevens,et al.  Soluble Antigens of Mycelia and Spherules in the In Vitro Detection of Immunity to Coccidioides immitis , 1974, Infection and immunity.

[10]  B. Zweiman,et al.  Coccidioidin delayed hypersensitivity: skin test and in vitro lymphocyte reactivities. , 1969, Journal of immunology.

[11]  H. B. Levine,et al.  Spherule coccidioidin in delayed dermal sensitivity reactions of experimental animals. , 1969, Sabouraudia.

[12]  J. Robbins TISSUE CULTURE STUDIES OF THE HUMAN LYMPHOCYTE. , 1964, Science.

[13]  D. Pappagianis,et al.  Studies of antigens from young mycelia of Coccidioides immitis. , 1961, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[14]  J. L. Converse Growth of Spherules of Coccidioides immitis in a Chemically Defined Liquid Medium , 1955, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[15]  Homer G. Rosenberger,et al.  The use of coccidioidin. , 1948, American review of tuberculosis.