Impaired protamination and sperm DNA damage in a Nellore bull with high percentages of morphological sperm defects in comparison to normospermic bulls

The routine semen evaluation assessing sperm concentration, motility and morphology, does not identify subtle defects in sperm chromatin architecture. Bulls appear to have stable chromatin, with low levels of DNA fragmentation. However, the nature of fragmentation and its impact on fertility remain unclear and there are no detailed reports characterizing the DNA organization and damage in this species. The intensive genetic selection, the use of artificial insemination and in vitro embryo production associated to the cryopreservation process can contribute to the chromatin damage and highlights the importance of sperm DNA integrity for the success of these technologies. Frozen-thawed semen samples from three ejaculates from a Nellore bull showed high levels of morphological sperm abnormalities (55.8±5.1%), and were selected for complementary tests. Damage of acrosomal (76.9±8.9%) and plasma membranes (75.7±9.3%) as well as sperm DNA strand breaks (13.8±9.5%) and protamination deficiency (3.7±0.6%) were significantly higher compared to the values measured in the semen of five Nellore bulls with normospermia (24.3±3.3%; 24.5±6.1%; 0.6±0.5%; 0.4±0.6% for acrosome, plasma membrane, DNA breaks and protamine deficiency, respectively) (P<0.05). Motility and percentage of spermatozoa with low mitochondrial potential showed no differences between groups. This study shows how routine semen analyses (in this case morphology) may point to the length and complexity of sperm cell damage emphasizing the importance of sperm function testing.

[1]  N. Corbet,et al.  Sperm protamine deficiency correlates with sperm DNA damage in Bos indicus bulls , 2014, Andrology.

[2]  C. Rathke,et al.  Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[3]  A. D. de Andrade,et al.  Effect of sequence of insemination after simultaneous thawing of multiple semen straws on conception rate to timed AI in suckled multiparous Nelore cows. , 2012, Theriogenology.

[4]  G. Z. Mingoti,et al.  Impact of proximal cytoplasmic droplets on quality traits and in-vitro embryo production efficiency of cryopreserved bull spermatozoa , 2012, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[5]  J. Gosálvez,et al.  Major morphological sperm abnormalities in the bull are related to sperm DNA damage. , 2011, Theriogenology.

[6]  W. Feitosa,et al.  Use of chromomycin A3 staining in bovine sperm cells for detection of protamine deficiency , 2009, Biotechnic & histochemistry : official publication of the Biological Stain Commission.

[7]  L. Palaoro,et al.  AgNOR technique could be useful for differential diagnosis of squamous carcinomatous cells and atypical cells related to human papillomavirus in cervical smears , 2009, Biotechnic & histochemistry : official publication of the Biological Stain Commission.

[8]  G. Z. Mingoti,et al.  The effect of high levels of proximal cytoplasmic droplets on sperm functional competence , 2008 .

[9]  B. Roelen,et al.  DNA damage in bovine sperm does not block fertilization and early embryonic development but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages. , 2006, Journal of andrology.

[10]  E. Mocé,et al.  Fertility evaluation of frozen/thawed semen. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[11]  G. Evans,et al.  Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[12]  M. Meistrich,et al.  Nucleoprotein Transitions During Spermiogenesis in Mice with Transition Nuclear Protein Tnp1 and Tnp2 Mutations1 , 2004, Biology of reproduction.

[13]  A. Zalensky,et al.  Male germline-specific histones in mouse and man , 2004, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[14]  A. H. Wang,et al.  Crystal structure of the [Mg2+-(chromomycin A3)2]-d(TTGGCCAA)2 complex reveals GGCC binding specificity of the drug dimer chelated by a metal ion. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. , 2003, Human reproduction update.

[16]  J. Ballescà,et al.  Marked differences in protamine content and P1/P2 ratios in sperm cells from percoll fractions between patients and controls. , 2003, Journal of andrology.

[17]  J. Guérin,et al.  Sperm DNA fragmentation decreases the pregnancy rate in an assisted reproductive technique. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[18]  J. Dadoune Expression of mammalian spermatozoal nucleoproteins , 2003, Microscopy research and technique.

[19]  W. S. Ward,et al.  Combination of Dithiothreitol and Detergent Treatment of Spermatozoa Causes Paternal Chromosomal Damage1 , 2002, Biology of reproduction.

[20]  Paolo Sassone-Corsi,et al.  Unique Chromatin Remodeling and Transcriptional Regulation in Spermatogenesis , 2002, Science.

[21]  J. Graham Assessment of sperm quality: a flow cytometric approach. , 2001, Animal reproduction science.

[22]  A. Kierszenbaum Transition nuclear proteins during spermiogenesis: Unrepaired DNA breaks not allowed , 2001, Molecular reproduction and development.

[23]  S. Ng,et al.  Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. , 1999, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[24]  C. H. Lee,et al.  Aspects of mammalian spermatogenesis: electrophoretical analysis of protamines in mammalian species. , 1999, Molecules and cells.

[25]  P. Tam,et al.  Histone- and Protamine-DNA Association: Conservation of Different Patterns within the β-Globin Domain in Human Sperm , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[26]  A. Campana,et al.  Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa. , 1996, Molecular human reproduction.

[27]  E. Blom [The ultrastructure of some characteristic sperm defects and a proposal for a new classification of the bull spermiogram (author's transl)]. , 1973, Nordisk veterinaermedicin.

[28]  L. Vandaele,et al.  6 ALTERED CHROMATIN CONFORMATION IN BOVINE SPERMATOZOA PERTURBS DYNAMIC DNA METHYLATION IN THE MALE PRONUCLEUS AFTER FERTILIZATION IN VITRO , 2013 .

[29]  R. Balhorn Sperm Chromatin: An Overview , 2011 .

[30]  R. Sharma,et al.  Spermatogenesis: An Overview , 2011 .

[31]  N. M. Hasan,et al.  FLOW CYTOMETRY: A NEW APPROACH FOR INDIRECT ASSESSMENT OF SPERM PROTAMINE DEFICIENCY , 2010 .

[32]  E. Celeghini,et al.  Simultaneous evaluation of the plasmatic, acrosomal and mitochondrial membranes in equine spermatozoa , 2004 .

[33]  J. Thundathil In vitro fertilizing characteristics of bovine sperm with abnormal morphology , 2001 .

[34]  W. S. Ward,et al.  DNA loop domain organization: The three‐dimensional genomic code , 2000, Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement.