On the Relative Efficiency of Performance Pay and Social Incentives

In contrast to the simplifying assumption of selfishness, social incentives have been shown to play a role in economic interactions. Before incorporating social incentives into models and policies, however, one needs to know their efficiency relative to standard pay-for-performance incentives. We report evidence from a large field experiment comparing the effectiveness of contingent and non-contingent (“social”) incentives in eliciting costly effort. The company with which we worked sent 7,250 letters asking customers to complete a survey. Some letters contained cash amounts ranging from $1 to $30, whereas others promised to pay upon compliance. We compare the response rates and cost effectiveness of these contingent and social incentives with each other and with a no-incentives control. In line with previous findings, we find that social incentives generated some effort: small amounts increased the response rate with respect to the control, but the size of the reward had a relatively minor effect. In contrast, the response rate for contingent incentives was low for small amounts but increased rapidly as incentives increased. Importantly, for (almost) any given response rate social incentives were more costly than contingent incentives.

[1]  A. H. Church ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[2]  D. Jobber,et al.  Modelling the Effects of Prepaid Monetary Incentives on Mail-Survey Response , 1988 .

[3]  Ernan Haruvy,et al.  Altruism, Equity, and Reciprocity in a Gift Exchange Experiment: An Encompassing Approach , 1999, Games Econ. Behav..

[4]  Stephan Meier,et al.  Do People Behave in Experiments as in the Field? Evidence from Donations , 2006 .

[5]  J. List The Behavioralist Meets the Market: Measuring Social Preferences and Reputation Effects in Actual Transactions , 2005 .

[6]  Joel Sobel,et al.  INTERDEPENDENT PREFERENCES AND RECIPROCITY , 2005 .

[7]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World , 2007 .

[8]  Parita Mukta,et al.  The Gift Relationship , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Canice Prendergast The Provision of Incentives in Firms , 1999 .

[10]  Richard M. Titmuss,et al.  The gift relationship , 1970 .

[11]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[13]  M. H. Quenouille,et al.  Survey Methods in Social Investigation , 1973 .

[14]  Armin Falk,et al.  Gift Exchange in the Field , 2007 .

[15]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  UNDERSTANDING MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE BEHAVIOR , 2004 .

[16]  George A. Akerlof Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange , 1982 .

[17]  T. Bewley Why Wages Don't Fall during a Recession , 1999 .

[18]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[19]  Graham Kalton,et al.  Survey Methods in Social Investigation. , 1972 .

[20]  J. Armstrong Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys , 1975 .

[21]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All , 2000 .

[22]  J. List,et al.  Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments , 2006 .

[23]  John Saunders,et al.  Prepaid monetary incentive effects on mail survey response , 2004 .

[24]  E. Fehr,et al.  Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation , 1993 .

[25]  G. Charness Attribution and Reciprocity in an Experimental Labor Market , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.