Performance benchmarking of core optical networking paradigms.

The sustainability of Future Internet critically depends on networking paradigms able to provide optimum and balanced performance over an extended set of efficiency and Quality of Service (QoS) metrics. In this work we benchmark the most established networking modes through appropriate performance metrics for three network topologies. The results demonstrate that the static reservation of WDM channels, as used in IP/WDM schemes, is severely limiting scalability, since it cannot efficiently adapt to the dynamic traffic fluctuations that are frequently observed in today's networks. Optical Burst Switching (OBS) schemes do provide dynamic resource reservation but their performance is compromised due to high burst loss. It is shown that the CANON (Clustered Architecture for Nodes in an Optical Network) architecture exploiting statistical multiplexing over a large scale core optical network and efficient grooming at appropriate granularity levels could be a viable alternative to existing static as well as dynamic wavelength reservation schemes. Through extensive simulation results we quantify performance gains and we show that CANON demonstrates the highest efficiency achieving both targets for statistical multiplexing gains and QoS guarantees.

[1]  R.S. Tucker,et al.  Does optical burst switching have a role in the core network? , 2005, OFC/NFOEC Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2005..

[2]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Advances in photonic packet switching: an overview , 2000, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[3]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  Optical burst switching (OBS) - a new paradigm for an Optical Internet^{1} , 1999, J. High Speed Networks.

[4]  M. Schiano,et al.  A λ switched photonic network for the new transport backbone of Telecom Italia , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Photonics in Switching.

[5]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Lightpath communications: an approach to high bandwidth optical WAN's , 1992, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  M. Duser,et al.  Analysis of a dynamically wavelength-routed optical burst switched network architecture , 2002 .

[7]  T. Orphanoudakis,et al.  QoS performance benchmarking of networking paradigms in core networks , 2010, 36th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication.

[8]  Didier Colle,et al.  Pan-European Optical Transport Networks: An Availability-based Comparison , 2004, Photonic Network Communications.

[9]  Theofanis Orphanoudakis,et al.  Optical packet routers: how they can efficiently and cost-effectively scale to petabits per second , 2008 .

[10]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  On the benefit of fast switching in optical networks , 2010, 2010 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication (OFC/NFOEC), collocated National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[11]  Pablo Pavón-Mariño,et al.  On the Myths of Optical Burst Switching , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  Chris Develder,et al.  The European IST project DAVID: a viable approach toward optical packet switching , 2003, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[13]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  A fair packet-level performance comparison of OBS and OCS , 2006, 2006 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[14]  A. Zapata-Beghelli,et al.  Dynamic Versus Static Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[15]  Yi Cai,et al.  Transmission of 96 $\,\times\,$100-Gb/s Bandwidth-Constrained PDM-RZ-QPSK Channels With 300% Spectral Efficiency Over 10610 km and 400% Spectral Efficiency Over 4370 km , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[16]  S.J.B. Yoo,et al.  Performance comparison of optical burst and circuit switched networks , 2005, OFC/NFOEC Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2005..

[17]  Yuanyuan Yang,et al.  Slotted Optical Burst Switching (SOBS) Networks , 2006, NCA.

[18]  C. Matrakidis,et al.  An Optical Network Architecture With Distributed Switching Inside Node Clusters Features Improved Loss, Efficiency, and Cost , 2007, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[19]  Andrew Zalesky To Burst or Circuit Switch? , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[20]  Jonathan S. Turner,et al.  Terabit burst switching , 1999, J. High Speed Networks.

[21]  Bo Li,et al.  Dynamic routing and wavelength assignment in the presence of wavelength conversion for all-optical networks , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[22]  Jin-Xing Cai,et al.  20 Tbit/s capacity transmission over 6,860 km , 2011 .

[23]  T.E. Darcie,et al.  Control-Plane Congestion in Optical-Burst-Switched Networks , 2009, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[24]  Andrew Zalesky To burst or circuit switch? , 2009, TNET.

[25]  John D. Angelopoulos,et al.  Scheme for performing statistical multiplexing in the optical layer , 2005 .

[26]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  Extending generalized multiprotocol label switching (GMPLS) for polymorphous, agile, and transparent optical networks (PATON) , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[27]  Theofanis Orphanoudakis,et al.  Evaluation of optical core networks based on the CANON architecture , 2010, Photonic Network Communications.

[28]  T. Orphanoudakis,et al.  Design, performance evaluation and energy efficiency of optical core networks based on the CANON architecture , 2009, 2009 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication - incudes post deadline papers.

[29]  M. Medard,et al.  Design and Analysis of Optical Flow-Switched Networks , 2009, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.