Comparison of different numerical Laplace inversion methods for engineering applications

Abstract Laplace transform is a powerful method for enabling solving differential equation in engineering and science. Using the Laplace transform for solving differential equations, however, sometimes leads to solutions in the Laplace domain that are not readily invertible to the real domain by analytical means. Numerical inversion methods are then used to convert the obtained solution from the Laplace domain into the real domain. Four inversion methods are evaluated in this paper. Several test functions, which arise in engineering applications, are used to evaluate the inversion methods. We also show that each of the inversion methods is accurate for a particular case. This study shows that among all these methods, the Fourier transform inversion technique is the most powerful but also the most computationally expensive. Stehfest’s method, which is used in many engineering applications is easy to implement and leads to accurate results for many problems including diffusion-dominated ones and solutions that behave like e − t type functions. However, this method fails to predict e t type functions or those with an oscillatory response, such as sine and wave functions.

[1]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Well Test Analysis , 2018, Petroleum Engineering.

[2]  V. Zakian Numerical inversion of Laplace transform , 1969 .

[3]  Ggk Engineering Mathematics Handbook , 1971 .

[4]  Henk Koppelaar,et al.  Remark on “Algorithm 486: Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transform [D5]” , 1976, TOMS.

[5]  Harvey Dubner,et al.  Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms by Relating Them to the Finite Fourier Cosine Transform , 1968, JACM.

[6]  Francoise Veillon,et al.  Algorithm 486: Numerical inversion of Laplace transform [D5] , 1974, CACM.

[7]  M.C.H. Chien,et al.  Vertical single-well pulse testing of a three-layer stratified reservoir , 1984 .

[8]  D. E. Brown,et al.  Zakian's technique for inverting Laplace transforms , 1972 .

[9]  J. Diard,et al.  Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms.: A useful tool for evaluation of chemical diffusion coefficients in ion-insertion electrodes investigated by PITT , 2007 .

[10]  Abbas Firoozabadi,et al.  Reinfiltration in Fractured Porous Media: Part 2 - Two Dimensional Model , 1994 .

[11]  Volker Krebs,et al.  A comparison of two methods for the numerical inversion of laplace transforms , 1995 .

[12]  Francoise Veillon,et al.  Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transform (Algorithm 486). , 1974 .

[13]  D. P. Gaver,et al.  Observing Stochastic Processes, and Approximate Transform Inversion , 1966, Oper. Res..

[14]  N. Kitahara,et al.  A numerical inversion of laplace transform and its application , 1988 .

[15]  T. A. Jelmert The effect of a distributed block length function on double porosity transitions during linear flow , 1995 .

[16]  D. K. Babu,et al.  Comparison of Solutions of the Nonlinear and Linearized Diffusion Equations , 1988 .

[17]  M. Pooladi-Darvish,et al.  Steam Heating of Fractured Formations Containing Heavy Oil: Basic Premises and a Single-Block Analytical Model , 1994 .

[18]  P. R. Graves-Morris,et al.  Pade Approximants and their Applications , 1974 .

[19]  M. R. Spiegel Mathematical handbook of formulas and tables , 1968 .