Transient boundary condition approach for simulating mechanical mixing in large wine tanks

Abstract Since wine is not continuously stirred during or after fermentation, it is common to use movable mixers on a variety of tank sizes or to install small, fast-rotating propeller mixers in large tanks. Many practically relevant optimization problems relate to processes occurring directly after the start of the propeller (flow field initialization period), which require 3D instationary models if CFD simulations are used. Based on traditional instationary models, these simulations are very time-consuming even on fast computers and limit the part of the flow field initialization period that can be computed. In this work, a new method was developed to speed up the transient simulation of mechanical mixing in large wine tanks. The method uses the traditional CFD techniques of moving reference frame (MRF) and several ensuing propeller rotations using sliding mesh (SM), to calculate a steady-state flow field and to compute the flow behavior in the propeller region. Subsequently, the flow’s key figures are extracted for the propeller region at multiple time-points during one rotation and continuously mapped to a new simulation starting from a flow field with zero velocity. This new approach using a transient boundary condition (BC), was validated with tank mixing experiments and literature data. In contrast to the MRF method, it allows e.g. for an estimation of minimum mixing times similar to the SM method, while computation times are reduced by a factor of up to 20 for tank-mixer scenarios evaluated in this work. For a mixing simulation in a wine tank, the new method takes only 3 days compared to more than 60 days using the traditional SM approach.

[1]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[2]  Aoyi Ochieng,et al.  Experimental measurement and computational fluid dynamics simulation of mixing in a stirred tank: a review , 2010 .

[3]  S. E. Tahry K-epsilon equation for compressible reciprocating engine flows , 1983 .

[4]  J. Aubin,et al.  Modeling turbulent flow in stirred tanks with CFD: the influence of the modeling approach, turbulence model and numerical scheme , 2004 .

[5]  Kevin J. Myers,et al.  The laminar and turbulent flow pattern of a pitched blade turbine , 1996 .

[6]  A. Nienow,et al.  CFD Study of Homogenization with Dual Rushton Turbines—Comparison with Experimental Results: Part I: Initial Studies☆ , 2000 .

[7]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  Assessment of standard k–ε, RSM and LES turbulence models in a baffled stirred vessel agitated by various impeller designs , 2008 .

[8]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques , 1998 .

[9]  Magnus Svärd,et al.  Well-Posed Boundary Conditions for the Navier-Stokes Equations , 2005, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[10]  Richard D. LaRoche,et al.  Sliding Mesh Simulation of Laminar Flow in Stirred Reactors , 1997 .

[11]  B. Launder,et al.  Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence , 1972 .

[12]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  CFD simulation of stirred tanks: Comparison of turbulence models (Part II: Axial flow impellers, multiple impellers and multiphase dispersions) , 2011 .

[13]  D. Deglon,et al.  CFD modelling of stirred tanks: Numerical considerations , 2006 .

[14]  C. C. Law,et al.  ParaView: An End-User Tool for Large-Data Visualization , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[15]  Murray Rudman,et al.  A hybrid method for simulation of axial flow impeller driven mixing vessels , 2000 .

[16]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[17]  Patrick J. Cullen,et al.  Food Mixing Principles And Applications , 2014 .

[18]  Dominik Schmidt,et al.  Numerical simulation of bubble flow homogenization in industrial scale wine fermentations , 2016 .

[19]  Zdzisław Jaworski,et al.  CFD modelling of turbulent macromixing in stirred tanks. Effect of the probe size and number on mixing indices , 1998 .

[20]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  CFD Study of Homogenization with Dual Rushton Turbines—Comparison with Experimental Results: Part II: The Multiple Reference Frame☆ , 2000 .

[21]  Zied Driss,et al.  Numerical investigation of turbulent flow generated in baffled stirred vessels equipped with three different turbines in one and two-stage system , 2011 .

[22]  Catherine Xuereb,et al.  Effect of Axial Agitator Configuration (Up-Pumping, Down-Pumping, Reverse Rotation) on Flow Patterns Generated in Stirred Vessels , 2001 .

[23]  F. Taghipour,et al.  Computational simulation of mixing flow of shear thinning non-Newtonian fluids with various impellers in a stirred tank , 2015 .

[24]  R. Boulton,et al.  Principles and Practices of Winemaking , 1995 .