Research Contribution of the Oldest Seat of Higher Learning in Pakistan: A Bibliometric Analysis of University of the Punjab

Bibliometric methods are used to access various elements in any data set. Similarly, this study uses a bibliometric method to evaluate the research performance of the University of the Punjab (PU), the oldest university of Pakistan. A peer university from a neighboring country, India, has been selected in this study along with three state-owned universities of Pakistan. The research yield of selected universities was analyzed since their establishment until 2019. The data were retrieved from the Scopus database in February 2020. The guidelines of the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education were used to select the peer universities. It has been analyzed that steady progress in research productivity was observed during the 20th century and in the last few years of the 19th century. A focus shift was observed with the onset of the 21st century and a rapid increase in research publications was observed in Pakistani universities. Around 92% of research studies of the University of the Punjab were carried out during the first 20 years of the 21st century and it leads the compared peer universities in terms of the number of research publications and the citations. It is also analyzed that there is a tendency among the authors of studied universities to publish their research articles in subscription-based journals. The authors affiliated with the University of the Punjab are more inclined to publish their research in open access journals as compared to the researchers of other studied universities. It is also observed that publications with single authors received a low average of citations per document while the publications with six or more authors had the highest average citations. The study recommends collaborative efforts for carrying out research and publication in open access journals is encouraged because of greater visibility, access, and impact.

[1]  Grégoire Côté,et al.  Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[2]  A. Srivastav,et al.  Scientific research production of India and China in environmental chemistry: a bibliometric assessment , 2019, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[3]  M. Anwar,et al.  Pakistani librarians as authors: a bibliometric study of citations in LISA‐PLUS , 1999 .

[4]  P. Radhakrishnan Indigenous Education in British India: A Profile , 1990 .

[5]  Ghassan Beydoun,et al.  Twenty Years of Information Systems Frontiers , 2019, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[6]  Daniel Torres-Salinas,et al.  Mapping Academic Institutions According to Their Journal Publication Profile: Spanish Universities as a Case Study , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  He Jiang,et al.  Compiler testing: a systematic literature analysis , 2018, Frontiers of Computer Science.

[8]  M. A. Qayyum,et al.  Why Medical Students Are Crucial to the Future of Research in South Asia , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[9]  Hristos Doucouliagos,et al.  Research output of Australian universities , 2004 .

[10]  W. Sweileh Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature on Syrian refugees and displaced people (2011–2017) , 2018, Conflict and Health.

[11]  Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro,et al.  Measuring research excellence: Number of Nobel Prize achievements versus conventional bibliometric indicators , 2011, J. Documentation.

[12]  Johannes Sorz,et al.  Humanities and social sciences in the bibliometric spotlight – Research output analysis at the University of Vienna and considerations for increasing visibility , 2016 .

[13]  Amanda H. Goodall Highly Cited Leaders and the Performance of Research Universities. , 2008 .

[14]  Shakil Ahmad,et al.  Evaluating the Research Performance of Islamabad-Based Higher Education Institutes , 2020 .

[15]  Sifeng Liu,et al.  Predicting the research output/growth of selected countries: application of Even GM (1, 1) and NDGM models , 2017, Scientometrics.

[16]  Fitri Ayu Kusumaningrum,et al.  Research Productivity and International Collaboration of Top Indonesian Universities , 2018, Current Science.

[17]  L. Baur,et al.  Longitudinal trends in global obesity research and collaboration: a review using bibliometric metadata , 2016, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[18]  Xiaoming Li,et al.  Biomaterials research of China from 2013 to 2017 based on bibliometrics and visualization analysis , 2019, PeerJ.

[19]  O. B. Onyancha,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Health and Medical Journals: Issues in Medical Scholarly Communication in Africa , 2016 .

[20]  Mario Coccia,et al.  A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes , 2005, Scientometrics.

[21]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis , 2020 .

[22]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Scientific research in the Indian subcontinent: selected trends and indicators 1973–2007 comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India, the local giant , 2010, Scientometrics.

[23]  Vahid Garousi,et al.  Citations, research topics and active countries in software engineering: A bibliometrics study , 2016, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[24]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  COMPREHENSIVE BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY OF JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT FROM 2007 TO 2019 , 2019, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management.

[25]  Kanwal Ameen,et al.  Perceptions of LIS professionals regarding use of Pakistan National Digital Library databases , 2010, Electron. Libr..

[26]  B. Charlton,et al.  Measuring revolutionary biomedical science 1992-2006 using Nobel prizes, Lasker (clinical medicine) awards and Gairdner awards (NLG metric). , 2007, Medical hypotheses.