Analysis of Networked Event-Based Control with a Shared Communication Medium: Part I – Pure ALOHA

Abstract In recent control literature, it was shown that event-based control requires less samples than time-triggered control. Consequently, it is argued that event-based control is superior to time-triggered control for Networked Control Systems (NCS) because it reduces the network utilization. The aim of this work is to show that it is not that simple. Therefore, we compare event-based and time-triggered control for a NCS consisting of subsystems with integrator dynamics and a shared communication medium, where packets are only lost due to collisions. We show that packet losses due to collisions drastically reduce the performance of event-based control if packets are transmitted whenever the event-based control generates an event. In contrast to previous findings, it turns out that in this setup time-triggered control is superior to event-based control.

[1]  Norman Abramson,et al.  The ALOHA System-Another Alternative for Computer Communications , 1899 .

[2]  B. Harshbarger An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Volume I , 1958 .

[3]  D. V. Lindley,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. Volume II , 1967, The Mathematical Gazette.

[4]  Frank E. Grubbs,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1951 .

[5]  D. Sant,et al.  Throughput of Unslotted ALOHA Channels with Arbitray Packet Interarrival Time Distributions , 1980, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  Raphael Rom,et al.  Multiple Access Protocols: Performance and Analysis , 1990, SIGMETRICS Perform. Evaluation Rev..

[7]  K. Åström,et al.  Comparison of Riemann and Lebesgue sampling for first order stochastic systems , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[8]  James Moyne,et al.  Using deadbands to reduce communication in networked control systems , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[9]  Andrea Goldsmith,et al.  Wireless communication tradeoffs in distributed control , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[10]  Wenyi Zhang Stabilization of networked control systems over a sharing link using ALOHA , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[11]  A. Goldsmith,et al.  Wireless medium access control in networked control systems , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[12]  Anton Cervin,et al.  Scheduling of event-triggered controllers on a shared network , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  W. P. M. H. Heemels,et al.  Analysis of event-driven controllers for linear systems , 2008, Int. J. Control.

[14]  Xiaofeng Wang,et al.  Event-triggered broadcasting across distributed networked control systems , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[15]  Anton Cervin,et al.  Sporadic event-based control of first-order linear stochastic systems , 2008, Autom..

[16]  D. Navarro,et al.  Fast and accurate calculations for first-passage times in Wiener diffusion models , 2009 .

[17]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  Scheduling packets for Event-triggered control , 2009, 2009 European Control Conference (ECC).

[18]  Jan Lunze,et al.  A state-feedback approach to event-based control , 2010, Autom..

[19]  Anton Cervin,et al.  A simple model for the interference between event-based control loops using a shared medium , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[20]  F. Allgöwer,et al.  Analysis of Networked Event-Based Control with a Shared Communication Medium : Part II-Slotted ALOHA ⋆ , 2011 .