Measures of energy expenditure and comfort in an ESP wheelchair: a controlled trial using hemiplegic users'

Aim. The aim of this pilot study using hemiplegic subjects was to measure energy expenditure, hand position and ride comfort, in a standard dual handrim Sunrise Breezy wheelchair compared to one modified with a novel ergonomic self-propelled steering (ESP) mechanism kit. A previous study by Mandy et al. (Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:255–260) reported that the attachment of the ESP kit to a standard Sunrise Breezy wheelchair provided a more ergonomically efficient mechanism for wheelchair steering and propulsion for non-disabled individuals. Methods. Thirteen hemiplegic stroke users participated in a repeated measures trial by driving two manual wheelchairs – a standard manual dual handrim wheelchair and one fitted with the ESP steering conversion kit. Wheelchairs were randomly assigned, to participants who drove each wheelchair around a designated circuit. Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide and heart rate were measured as indicators of ergonomic efficiency using a Cosmed analyser. Comfort for each wheelchair was measured using a validated questionnaire. Results. Oxygen consumption (O2mls/min) and exhaled carbon dioxide (CO2mls/min) were significantly lower in the modified wheelchair (p < 0.004 and p < 0.04, respectively). Time taken to complete the course was significantly faster in the ESP (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in heart rate readings between the wheelchairs. All comfort ratings were reported to be significantly greater in the ESP (p < 0.01). Conclusions. The ESP conversion kit transforms a standard Sunrise Breezy wheelchair into one that is ergonomically more efficient and comfortable for hemiplegic subjects.

[1]  M. M. DiGiovine,et al.  User assessment of manual wheelchair ride comfort and ergonomics. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  M. Boninger,et al.  Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  T. Phillips,et al.  Psychosocial disability in physically restored long-term stroke survivors. , 1980, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Jean-Paul Micallef,et al.  Validation of an incremental field test for the direct assessment of peak oxygen uptake in wheelchair-dependent athletes , 1996, Spinal Cord.

[5]  S. Taylor,et al.  A survey of wheelchair seating problems of the institutionalized elderly. , 1991, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[6]  J T Kearney,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Cosmed K2 Instrument , 1993, International journal of sports medicine.

[7]  Stefania Fatone,et al.  High‐ or low‐technology measurements of energy expenditure in clinical gait analysis? , 1999, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[8]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 Portable Metabolic System , 2001, International journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Samuel Lesley,et al.  An ergonomic wheelchair for hemiplegics , 2002 .

[10]  H E Veeger,et al.  Effect of handrim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Labi Ml,et al.  Psychosocial disability in physically restored long-term stroke survivors. , 1980, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Kevin Lucas,et al.  Energy expenditure, and comfort in a modified wheelchair for people with hemiplegia: A controlled trial , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.